FBK
Price
$55.75
Change
+$1.17 (+2.14%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
2.98B
87 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
HWC
Price
$55.70
Change
-$0.03 (-0.05%)
Updated
Oct 24 closing price
Capitalization
4.72B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBK vs HWC

Header iconFBK vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts FBK vs HWCBanner chart's image
FB Financial
Price$55.75
Change+$1.17 (+2.14%)
Volume$207.1K
Capitalization2.98B
Hancock Whitney
Price$55.70
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
Volume$896.55K
Capitalization4.72B
FBK vs HWC Comparison Chart in %
FBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBK vs. HWC commentary
Oct 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBK is a StrongBuy and HWC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FBK: $55.75 vs. HWC: $55.70)
Brand notoriety: FBK and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBK: 49% vs. HWC: 103%
Market capitalization -- FBK: $2.98B vs. HWC: $4.72B
FBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.98B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.72B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $174.11B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBK’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FBK’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBK is a better buy in the long-term than HWC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBK is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

FBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.99% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +7.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +23.12%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBK is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jan 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+7.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($4.72B) has a higher market cap than FBK($2.98B). FBK has higher P/E ratio than HWC: FBK (28.74) vs HWC (10.00). FBK YTD gains are higher at: 9.513 vs. HWC (4.237). HWC has more cash in the bank: 513M vs. FBK (150M). FBK has less debt than HWC: FBK (224M) vs HWC (849M). HWC has higher revenues than FBK: HWC (1.47B) vs FBK (427M).
FBKHWCFBK / HWC
Capitalization2.98B4.72B63%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD9.5134.237224%
P/E Ratio28.7410.00287%
Revenue427M1.47B29%
Total Cash150M513M29%
Total Debt224M849M26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBK vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
FBK
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
238
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3225
SMR RATING
1..100
1812
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4761
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1866
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FBK's Valuation (50) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (50) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBK’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (25) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBK (32) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FBK’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBK (18) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FBK’s over the last 12 months.

FBK's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (61) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBK’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

FBK's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWC (66) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBK’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBKHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FLPSX41.69N/A
N/A
Fidelity Low-Priced Stock
GAOCX21.76N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Global Allocation C
MOSSX10.14N/A
N/A
MassMutual Overseas R5
SMDRX20.39N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps SDR
AISZX18.52N/A
N/A
Alger SmallCap Growth Institutional Z-2

FBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBK has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBK jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBK
1D Price
Change %
FBK100%
+2.14%
FNB - FBK
91%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
HWC - FBK
90%
Closely correlated
-0.05%
ABCB - FBK
90%
Closely correlated
+2.12%
ASB - FBK
90%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
ONB - FBK
89%
Closely correlated
+2.09%
More