FBK
Price
$54.69
Change
-$1.30 (-2.32%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
2.73B
39 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HWC
Price
$74.43
Change
-$0.12 (-0.16%)
Updated
Sep 9 closing price
Capitalization
5.97B
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBK vs HWC

FBK vs HWC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBK vs. HWC commentary
Sep 10, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBK is a Buy and HWC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 10, 2026
Stock price -- (FBK: $54.69 vs. HWC: $74.43)
Brand notoriety: FBK and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBK: 131% vs. HWC: 113%
Market capitalization -- FBK: $2.73B vs. HWC: $5.97B
FBK [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.73B. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $5.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.44B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBK’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FBK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than FBK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBK’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBK’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBK is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

FBK (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.79% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBK is expected to report earnings on Oct 19, 2026.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Oct 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($5.97B) has a higher market cap than FBK($2.73B). HWC (14.60) and FBK (14.47) have similar P/E ratio . HWC YTD gains are higher at: 19.418 vs. FBK (-0.917). HWC has more cash in the bank: 572M vs. FBK (160M). FBK has less debt than HWC: FBK (372M) vs HWC (1.89B). HWC has higher revenues than FBK: HWC (1.46B) vs FBK (701M).
FBKHWCFBK / HWC
Capitalization2.73B5.97B46%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.91719.418-5%
P/E Ratio14.4714.6099%
Revenue701M1.46B48%
Total Cash160M572M28%
Total Debt372M1.89B20%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBK vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
FBK
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5964
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5528
SMR RATING
1..100
1511
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5647
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9021
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HWC's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBK (71) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FBK’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBK (55) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FBK’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBK (15) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FBK’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBK (56) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FBK’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's P/E Growth Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FBK (90) in the Major Banks industry. This means that HWC’s stock grew significantly faster than FBK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBKHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FBK
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HWC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEMG24.450.58
+2.44%
Leverage Shares 2X Long Nem Daily ETF
IBHH23.32-0.02
-0.11%
iShares iBonds 2028 Term HY & Inc ETF
TOPC34.81-0.11
-0.32%
iShares S&P 500 3% Capped ETF
NBJP35.48-0.55
-1.52%
Neuberger Japan Equity ETF
KOMP66.61-1.10
-1.63%
Stt Strt®SPDR®S&PKenshoNwEcosComposETF

FBK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBK has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBK jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBK
1D Price
Change %
FBK100%
-2.32%
UBSI - FBK
83%
Closely correlated
-0.78%
UCB - FBK
83%
Closely correlated
-0.71%
HWC - FBK
83%
Closely correlated
-0.16%
ABCB - FBK
83%
Closely correlated
-1.11%
ASB - FBK
83%
Closely correlated
-0.92%
More