FBP
Price
$22.23
Change
+$0.09 (+0.41%)
Updated
Aug 29, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.55B
60 days until earnings call
SHFS
Price
$2.40
Change
-$0.04 (-1.64%)
Updated
Aug 29, 03:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
7.11M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FBP vs SHFS

Header iconFBP vs SHFS Comparison
Open Charts FBP vs SHFSBanner chart's image
First Ban
Price$22.23
Change+$0.09 (+0.41%)
Volume$10.99K
Capitalization3.55B
SHF Holdings
Price$2.40
Change-$0.04 (-1.64%)
Volume$100
Capitalization7.11M
FBP vs SHFS Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FBP vs. SHFS commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBP is a Buy and SHFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FBP: $22.14 vs. SHFS: $2.44)
Brand notoriety: FBP and SHFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBP: 93% vs. SHFS: 218%
Market capitalization -- FBP: $3.55B vs. SHFS: $7.11M
FBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.55B. SHFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $7.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHFS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FBP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHFS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBP is a better buy in the long-term than SHFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SHFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBP is a better buy in the short-term than SHFS.

Price Growth

FBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.34% price change this week, while SHFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -12.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBP is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.21% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBP($3.55B) has a higher market cap than SHFS($7.12M). FBP has higher P/E ratio than SHFS: FBP (11.78) vs SHFS (0.98). FBP YTD gains are higher at: 22.229 vs. SHFS (-72.907). SHFS has less debt than FBP: SHFS (11.5M) vs FBP (331M). FBP has higher revenues than SHFS: FBP (934M) vs SHFS (12.3M).
FBPSHFSFBP / SHFS
Capitalization3.55B7.12M49,937%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.229-72.907-30%
P/E Ratio11.780.981,198%
Revenue934M12.3M7,593%
Total Cash684MN/A-
Total Debt331M11.5M2,878%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBP: Fundamental Ratings
FBP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
22
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
48
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBPSHFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
89%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SHFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRDGX84.06N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth
TLVAX24.38N/A
N/A
Timothy Plan Large/Mid Cap Value A
DCGTX18.75N/A
N/A
Jackson Square SMID-Cap Growth IS
PICMX62.98N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth I
ETCGX49.60N/A
N/A
Eventide Gilead C

SHFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHFS and FBP have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHFS and FBP's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHFS
1D Price
Change %
SHFS100%
+7.96%
FBP - SHFS
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
WAL - SHFS
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.41%
OFG - SHFS
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.20%
TCBI - SHFS
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
COLB - SHFS
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.77%
More