FBP
Price
$21.45
Change
+$0.25 (+1.18%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
5 days until earnings call
WSFS
Price
$52.71
Change
+$0.41 (+0.78%)
Updated
Oct 17 closing price
6 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FBP vs WSFS

Header iconFBP vs WSFS Comparison
Open Charts FBP vs WSFSBanner chart's image
First Ban
Price$21.45
Change+$0.25 (+1.18%)
Volume$575.18K
CapitalizationN/A
WSFS Financial
Price$52.71
Change+$0.41 (+0.78%)
Volume$195.27K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FBP vs WSFS Comparison Chart
Loading...
FBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
FBP vs. WSFS commentary
Oct 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FBP is a StrongSell and WSFS is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FBP: $21.45 vs. WSFS: $52.71)
Brand notoriety: FBP and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FBP: 59% vs. WSFS: 76%
Market capitalization -- FBP: $2.93B vs. WSFS: $2.71B
FBP [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.93B. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.71B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FBP’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FBP’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FBP is a better buy in the long-term than WSFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FBP’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FBP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FBP is a better buy in the short-term than WSFS.

Price Growth

FBP (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.41% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

FBP is expected to report earnings on Jan 24, 2025.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Jan 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.91% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FBP($2.94B) has a higher market cap than WSFS($2.71B). FBP (10.12) and WSFS (10.04) have similar P/E ratio . FBP YTD gains are higher at: 33.875 vs. WSFS (15.900). FBP has less debt than WSFS: FBP (662M) vs WSFS (895M). WSFS has higher revenues than FBP: WSFS (1.02B) vs FBP (897M).
FBPWSFSFBP / WSFS
Capitalization2.94B2.71B108%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.87515.900213%
P/E Ratio10.1210.04101%
Revenue897M1.02B88%
Total CashN/A606M-
Total Debt662M895M74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FBP vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
FBP
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
167
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
93
Overvalued
63
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1260
SMR RATING
1..100
1112
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4348
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3230
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

WSFS's Valuation (63) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FBP (93) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to FBP’s over the last 12 months.

FBP's Profit vs Risk Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WSFS (60) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FBP’s stock grew somewhat faster than WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

FBP's SMR Rating (11) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (12) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FBP’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

FBP's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (48) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FBP’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FBP (32) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to FBP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FBPWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FBP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WSFS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AAPL232.150.37
+0.16%
Apple
SPY582.350.05
+0.01%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF Trust
TSLA220.89-0.44
-0.20%
Tesla
BTC.X67399.836000-212.882810
-0.31%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency
GME21.41-0.25
-1.15%
GameStop Corp

FBP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBP has been closely correlated with OFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBP jumps, then OFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBP
1D Price
Change %
FBP100%
+1.18%
OFG - FBP
86%
Closely correlated
+0.53%
HWC - FBP
86%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
BPOP - FBP
85%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
WSFS - FBP
85%
Closely correlated
+0.78%
ONB - FBP
84%
Closely correlated
+0.51%
More

WSFS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WSFS has been closely correlated with ABCB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WSFS jumps, then ABCB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WSFS
1D Price
Change %
WSFS100%
+0.78%
ABCB - WSFS
89%
Closely correlated
+0.62%
SBCF - WSFS
88%
Closely correlated
+1.94%
HWC - WSFS
88%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
STEL - WSFS
88%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
UBSI - WSFS
88%
Closely correlated
-0.68%
More