JPM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 9 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FBUF | JPM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 58% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 4 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 52% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 57% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 63% | 15 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 43% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 54% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FBUF and META have been poorly correlated (+6% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FBUF and META's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FBUF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBUF | 100% | +0.75% | ||
| META - FBUF | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.28% | ||
| GOOGL - FBUF | 3% Poorly correlated | +6.73% | ||
| JPM - FBUF | 2% Poorly correlated | +0.27% | ||
| MSFT - FBUF | 1% Poorly correlated | +3.02% | ||
| AAPL - FBUF | -1% Poorly correlated | -7.35% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JPM has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JPM jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.