FCEL
Price
$19.54
Change
+$1.18 (+6.43%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.56B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
QS
Price
$5.98
Change
+$0.28 (+4.91%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
3.68B
66 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCEL vs QS

FCEL vs QS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCEL vs. QS commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCEL is a Hold and QS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (FCEL: $19.54 vs. QS: $5.98)
Brand notoriety: FCEL: Notable vs. QS: Not notable
FCEL represents the Electrical Products, while QS is part of the Auto Parts: OEM industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCEL: 58% vs. QS: 96%
Market capitalization -- FCEL: $1.56B vs. QS: $3.68B
FCEL [@Electrical Products] is valued at $1.56B. QS’s [@Auto Parts: OEM] market capitalization is $3.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electrical Products] industry ranges from $300.34B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $72.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electrical Products] industry is $5.53B. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCEL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileQS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FCEL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • QS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCEL is a better buy in the long-term than QS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCEL’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCEL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • QS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, QS is a better buy in the short-term than FCEL.

Price Growth

FCEL (@Electrical Products) experienced а -12.65% price change this week, while QS (@Auto Parts: OEM) price change was -3.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electrical Products industry was -7.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.71%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.30%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCEL is expected to report earnings on Sep 08, 2026.

QS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electrical Products (-7.34% weekly)

The industry produces a diverse range of electricity-powered equipment, appliances and components, catering to both households and industries. The products include power, distribution and specialty transformers; electric motors, generators and motor-generator sets; switchgear and switchboard apparatus; light bulbs, tubes, fittings and electric signs etc. Consumer income, construction spending, and industrial production are major drivers of demand for this industry’s products. Large companies tend to have economies of scale in production, marketing, and distribution, while smaller companies can potentially carve out their own market through niche or specialty offerings. The US electrical products manufacturing industry includes about 5,700 establishments (single-location companies and units of multi-location companies) with combined annual revenue of about $125 billion. (according to a study published in First Research). Emerson Electric Co., Hubbell Incorporated and Eaton Corporation plc are major electrical products makers in the U.S.

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.58% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
QS($3.68B) has a higher market cap than FCEL($1.56B). FCEL YTD gains are higher at: 167.305 vs. QS (-42.610). FCEL has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -173.15M vs. QS (-336.7M). QS has more cash in the bank: 859M vs. FCEL (373M). QS has less debt than FCEL: QS (67.1M) vs FCEL (160M). FCEL has higher revenues than QS: FCEL (168M) vs QS (0).
FCELQSFCEL / QS
Capitalization1.56B3.68B42%
EBITDA-173.15M-336.7M51%
Gain YTD167.305-42.610-393%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue168M0-
Total Cash373M859M43%
Total Debt160M67.1M238%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCEL vs QS: Fundamental Ratings
FCEL
QS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3563
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCEL's Valuation (41) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as QS (49) in the null industry. This means that FCEL’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

FCEL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as QS (100) in the null industry. This means that FCEL’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

FCEL's SMR Rating (98) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as QS (98) in the null industry. This means that FCEL’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

FCEL's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as QS (63) in the null industry. This means that FCEL’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

FCEL's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Industrial Machinery industry is in the same range as QS (100) in the null industry. This means that FCEL’s stock grew similarly to QS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCELQS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
84%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCEL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
QS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPBC49.770.53
+1.07%
Simplify US Equity PLUS Bitcoin Stgy ETF
JETU29.810.30
+1.03%
MAX Airlines 3X Leveraged ETN
GQQQ35.600.15
+0.43%
Astoria US Quality Growth Kings ETF
CWB103.690.12
+0.12%
State Street® SPDR® Blmbg Cnvrt Secs ETF
QMAR37.630.04
+0.09%
FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Mar

QS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, QS has been loosely correlated with SES. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if QS jumps, then SES could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QS
1D Price
Change %
QS100%
+4.91%
SES - QS
61%
Loosely correlated
+6.25%
SLDP - QS
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.49%
AEVA - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
-3.07%
AUR - QS
52%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
MVST - QS
42%
Loosely correlated
+2.67%
More