FCF
Price
$21.09
Change
-$0.16 (-0.75%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
2.13B
65 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WSFS
Price
$79.88
Change
-$0.02 (-0.03%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.08B
64 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FCF vs WSFS

FCF vs WSFS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FCF vs. WSFS commentary
Aug 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FCF is a Hold and WSFS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 23, 2026
Stock price -- (FCF: $21.09 vs. WSFS: $79.88)
Brand notoriety: FCF and WSFS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FCF: 80% vs. WSFS: 83%
Market capitalization -- FCF: $2.13B vs. WSFS: $4.08B
FCF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.13B. WSFS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWSFS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WSFS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the long-term than WSFS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FCF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WSFS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FCF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WSFS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the short-term than WSFS.

Price Growth

FCF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.45% price change this week, while WSFS (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -2.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.91%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

FCF is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

WSFS is expected to report earnings on Oct 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-2.32% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WSFS($4.08B) has a higher market cap than FCF($2.13B). WSFS (13.40) and FCF (12.86) have similar P/E ratio . WSFS YTD gains are higher at: 45.736 vs. FCF (27.779). WSFS has more cash in the bank: 2.47B vs. FCF (118M). FCF has less debt than WSFS: FCF (155M) vs WSFS (310M). WSFS has higher revenues than FCF: WSFS (1.1B) vs FCF (538M).
FCFWSFSFCF / WSFS
Capitalization2.13B4.08B52%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD27.77945.73661%
P/E Ratio12.8613.4096%
Revenue538M1.1B49%
Total Cash118M2.47B5%
Total Debt155M310M50%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FCF vs WSFS: Fundamental Ratings
FCF
WSFS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
46
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2330
SMR RATING
1..100
4231
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4544
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4935
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FCF's Valuation (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (73) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WSFS (30) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to WSFS’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's SMR Rating (31) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (45) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

WSFS's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (49) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that WSFS’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FCFWSFS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WSFS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SLON26.402.05
+8.42%
ProShares Ultra Solana ETF
HAWX46.020.36
+0.79%
iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI ACWI exUS ETF
BST49.570.38
+0.77%
BlackRock Science and Technology Trust
UDN18.340.01
+0.05%
Invesco DB US Dollar Bearish
PLTD5.09-0.18
-3.42%
Direxion Daily PLTR Bear 1X Shares

FCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FCF has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FCF jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FCF
1D Price
Change %
FCF100%
-0.75%
UBSI - FCF
88%
Closely correlated
+0.23%
NWBI - FCF
87%
Closely correlated
+0.72%
STBA - FCF
86%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
PRK - FCF
85%
Closely correlated
+0.54%
CPF - FCF
85%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
More