Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FCHKX vs WRCGX
FCHKX vs WRCGX Comparison
Open Charts FCHKX vs WRCGX
FCHKX vs WRCGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FCHKX has more cash in the bank: 2.67B vs. WRCGX (2.09M). WRCGX pays higher dividends than FCHKX: WRCGX (0.86) vs FCHKX (0.67). FCHKX was incepted earlier than WRCGX: FCHKX (18 years) vs WRCGX (5 years). WRCGX (8.54) is less costly to investors than FCHKX (1.92). WRCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. FCHKX (34.00). FCHKX has a lower initial minimum investment than WRCGX: FCHKX (250) vs WRCGX (1000000). FCHKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.05 vs. WRCGX (0.74). FCHKX return over 5 years is better than : 36.33 vs. WRCGX (-30.93).
| FCHKX | WRCGX | FCHKX / WRCGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.94 | 204% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 8.54 | 22% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 30.840 | 0.769 | 4,009% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.67B | 2.09M | 127,730% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.67 | 0.86 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 47.05 | 0.74 | 6,388% |
| Returns for 3 years | 121.51 | 24.43 | 497% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.33 | -30.93 | -117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 174.03 | N/A | - |