Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FDRV vs SMH
FDRV vs SMH Comparison
Open Charts FDRV vs SMH
FDRV vs SMH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FDRV vs. SMH commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDRV is a Hold and SMH is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMH has more net assets: 71.9B vs. FDRV (28.6M). SMH has a higher annual dividend yield than FDRV: SMH (72.149) vs FDRV (20.828). FDRV was incepted earlier than SMH: FDRV (5 years) vs SMH (14 years). SMH (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than FDRV (0.39). FDRV has a higher turnover SMH (12.00) vs SMH (12.00).
| FDRV | SMH | FDRV / SMH | |
| Gain YTD | 20.828 | 72.149 | 29% |
| Net Assets | 28.6M | 71.9B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.39 | 0.35 | 111% |
| Turnover | 77.00 | 12.00 | 642% |
| Yield | 1.05 | 0.18 | 571% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FDRV | SMH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 87% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 87% | 5 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FDRV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDRV has been closely correlated with STM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FDRV jumps, then STM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FDRV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FDRV | 100% | +1.08% | ||
| STM - FDRV | 79% Closely correlated | -1.05% | ||
| ALGM - FDRV | 70% Closely correlated | +5.10% | ||
| ST - FDRV | 70% Closely correlated | +1.10% | ||
| SYNA - FDRV | 69% Closely correlated | +1.73% | ||
| LSCC - FDRV | 66% Closely correlated | +1.17% | ||
More | ||||
SMH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMH has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMH jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMH | 100% | +1.72% | ||
| LRCX - SMH | 86% Closely correlated | +1.18% | ||
| AMAT - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +2.64% | ||
| KLAC - SMH | 83% Closely correlated | +5.55% | ||
| ASML - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | -1.89% | ||
| TSM - SMH | 80% Closely correlated | +0.68% | ||
More | ||||