FDS
Price
$281.47
Change
+$4.54 (+1.64%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
10.64B
70 days until earnings call
MCO
Price
$490.09
Change
+$1.66 (+0.34%)
Updated
Oct 8 closing price
Capitalization
87.9B
19 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDS vs MCO

Header iconFDS vs MCO Comparison
Open Charts FDS vs MCOBanner chart's image
Factset Research Systems
Price$281.47
Change+$4.54 (+1.64%)
Volume$688.14K
Capitalization10.64B
Moody's
Price$490.09
Change+$1.66 (+0.34%)
Volume$807.49K
Capitalization87.9B
FDS vs MCO Comparison Chart in %
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. MCO commentary
Oct 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a StrongBuy and MCO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 09, 2025
Stock price -- (FDS: $281.47 vs. MCO: $490.09)
Brand notoriety: FDS and MCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 100% vs. MCO: 114%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $10.64B vs. MCO: $87.9B
FDS [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $10.64B. MCO’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $87.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $147.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $30.69B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MCO is a better buy in the long-term than FDS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • MCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the short-term than MCO.

Price Growth

FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а -1.83% price change this week, while MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +2.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Dec 18, 2025.

MCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (+1.03% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MCO($87.9B) has a higher market cap than FDS($10.6B). MCO has higher P/E ratio than FDS: MCO (41.67) vs FDS (18.10). MCO YTD gains are higher at: 4.115 vs. FDS (-40.948). MCO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.59B vs. FDS (888M). MCO has more cash in the bank: 2.29B vs. FDS (28.9M). FDS has less debt than MCO: FDS (1.62B) vs MCO (7.28B). MCO has higher revenues than FDS: MCO (7.31B) vs FDS (2.29B).
FDSMCOFDS / MCO
Capitalization10.6B87.9B12%
EBITDA888M3.59B25%
Gain YTD-40.9484.115-995%
P/E Ratio18.1041.6743%
Revenue2.29B7.31B31%
Total Cash28.9M2.29B1%
Total Debt1.62B7.28B22%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs MCO: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
MCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
38
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
3618
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6555
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9351
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDS's Valuation (30) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (82). This means that FDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (100). This means that MCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's SMR Rating (18) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (36). This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (65). This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (93). This means that MCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
49%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FDS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MCO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ROE34.890.37
+1.06%
Astoria US Equal Weight Quality KingsETF
IBIH26.330.01
+0.04%
iShares iBonds Oct 2031 Term Tips ETF
GCOR41.670.01
+0.01%
Goldman Sachs Access US Aggregate Bd ETF
QSIG49.04N/A
N/A
WisdomTree US Shrt-Term Corp Bd
SUB106.64-0.02
-0.02%
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bd ETF

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with MORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
+1.64%
MORN - FDS
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.88%
SPGI - FDS
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
MCO - FDS
62%
Loosely correlated
+0.34%
NDAQ - FDS
57%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
MSCI - FDS
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.38%
More

MCO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MCO has been closely correlated with SPGI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MCO jumps, then SPGI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MCO
1D Price
Change %
MCO100%
+0.34%
SPGI - MCO
89%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
NDAQ - MCO
78%
Closely correlated
+1.62%
MORN - MCO
75%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
MSCI - MCO
69%
Closely correlated
-0.38%
TRU - MCO
68%
Closely correlated
+3.80%
More