Advertisement
FDS vs MCO
Which Stock Would AI Choose? FactSet Research Systems (FDS) vs. Moody's Corporation (MCO) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FDS has shown notably stronger recent momentum, gaining roughly 29% over the trailing three months and trading near its 52-week high.
- MCO offers a larger, higher-margin franchise anchored by its credit ratings duopoly, but its shares have pulled back from recent peaks.
- The two businesses sit in different parts of the financial-information market: subscription data and workflow software versus credit ratings and risk analytics.
- FactSet's growth is increasingly tied to AI adoption, while Moody's is more sensitive to bond issuance volumes and credit-market activity.
- Valuation and dividend profiles diverge sharply, with FDS carrying a higher yield and MCO trading at a premium earnings multiple.
Introduction
Investors evaluating financial-data and analytics providers often compare FDS (FactSet Research Systems) and MCO (Moody's Corporation) as two ways to gain exposure to the same broad secular theme: the rising demand for financial information, risk assessment, and AI-enabled tools. While both serve institutional clients and generate largely recurring revenue, their business models, scale, and market positioning differ meaningfully. This stock comparison examines recent relative performance, growth drivers, and risk factors to help traders and investors weigh which name may better suit their objectives in the current market environment.
FDS Overview and Recent Performance
FactSet Research Systems is a global provider of integrated financial data, analytics, and workflow software used by asset managers, investment banks, wealth advisors, and other financial professionals. Its subscription-based model is built on desktop workstations, data feeds, and application programming interfaces (APIs), a structure that produces highly recurring revenue.
In recent weeks, FDS has been among the stronger performers in its peer group. Shares have advanced roughly 29% over the trailing three months and traded close to their 52-week high, outpacing the broader financial-data sector. The rally has been driven by accelerating organic growth in Annual Subscription Value (ASV, a measure of contracted recurring revenue) and rising adoption of AI-enabled products, including the Model Context Protocol (MCP), which lets clients connect FactSet data directly to their own AI systems. Management has cited AI-related stock-keeping units (SKUs) as a growing share of new ASV. The company has also extended partnerships in wealth management and continued its long-running shareholder returns, including its 27th consecutive annual dividend increase. Sentiment remains mixed, however: some analysts hold neutral or cautious ratings, pointing to valuation after the recent run-up and near-term margin pressure from technology investment.
MCO Overview and Recent Performance
Moody's Corporation operates two complementary segments: Moody's Investors Service (MIS), one of the world's dominant credit rating agencies, and Moody's Analytics (MA), which sells subscription-based research, data, and risk-management software. This combination gives Moody's a powerful position across global debt markets, from bond issuance to ongoing risk monitoring.
Relative to FDS, MCO has shown less consistent near-term price momentum. The stock has pulled back from its yearly high in recent weeks, even as the broader business remains profitable and growing. Moody's scale is substantial: trailing twelve-month revenue is in the range of $8.2 billion with a profit margin above 30%, figures well beyond FactSet's profile. Growth is tied closely to debt issuance activity, private credit expansion, and demand for analytics tools. The company has continued to roll out new offerings, including a private credit risk model and AI-driven "agentic" solutions, while Wall Street consensus remains broadly constructive, with an average price target above the current share price. The next quarterly earnings report is a near-term focal point for traders.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's AI trading bots, chosen for their suitability to current market conditions. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, each with its own strategy, timeframe, risk profile, performance history, and universe of securities. Because not every bot performs equally well in every market regime, the Trending AI Robots section highlights those whose recent signals and statistics stand out, giving traders a focused starting point rather than an overwhelming list. Whether you follow FDS, MCO, or a broader basket of names, exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help you identify the strategies currently best aligned with shifting market dynamics.
Head-to-Head Comparison
The most fundamental contrast between these two names is their business model. FactSet is a pure-play provider of financial data and workflow software, competing on the breadth and integration of its content. Moody's, by contrast, combines a ratings business with substantial regulatory and structural barriers to entry—shared primarily with one major competitor—alongside a fast-growing analytics franchise. This gives Moody's greater scale, higher margins, and a higher return on equity (ROE, a measure of profitability relative to shareholder capital).
Growth drivers also differ. FactSet's recent acceleration has been fueled by AI adoption and deeper wallet-share penetration among existing clients. Moody's growth is more cyclical, moving with global debt issuance, refinancing activity, and private credit expansion. On risk, FactSet faces competitive pressure from larger data rivals and questions about whether AI could compress pricing power over time; Moody's faces the possibility of weaker issuance cycles and any regulatory shift affecting the ratings industry.
From a market positioning standpoint, the divergence is visible in both momentum and valuation. FactSet's stronger trailing momentum and higher dividend yield contrast with Moody's premium price-to-earnings (P/E) multiple and lower yield, reflecting the market's willingness to pay for Moody's duopoly and software-like economics.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable trend consistency, relative momentum, and positioning, Tickeron's AI would likely tilt toward FDS in the current environment. FactSet's sustained uptrend, accelerating subscription growth, and proximity to its 52-week high suggest more favorable near-term technical alignment, even as its valuation debate introduces caution. Moody's retains a stronger long-term franchise and a more bullish analyst consensus, but its recent pullback and dependence on debt issuance volumes introduce near-term uncertainty. An AI-driven system prioritizing trend and momentum would therefore probably favor FDS, while a longer-horizon, quality-oriented framework might lean toward MCO. These are probabilistic assessments of current conditions, not guarantees of future performance.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a StrongBuy and MCO is a Hold.
FDS's MACD Histogram crosses above signal line
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FDS turned positive on October 08, 2026. Looking at past instances where FDS's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 30 of 46 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 65%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 08, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FDS as a result. In 37 of 74 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 50%.
FDS moved above its 50-day moving average on October 08, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
The 10-day moving average for FDS crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on October 16, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 9 of 19 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 47%.
Following a +7.42% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FDS advanced for three days, in 203 of 359 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 57%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator has been in the overbought zone for 2 days. Expect a price pull-back in the near future.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 10 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FDS declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 56%.
FDS broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 22, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for FDS entered a downward trend on October 08, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 6 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating outstanding price growth. FDS’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 28 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 36 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 77 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (5.598) is normal, around the industry mean (4.019). P/E Ratio (20.964) is within average values for comparable stocks, (17.786). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.172) is also within normal values, averaging (1.780). Dividend Yield (0.015) settles around the average of (0.019) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (4.223) is also within normal values, averaging (7.166).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FDS’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock worse than average.
MCO's RSI Indicator recovers from oversold territory
The RSI Oscillator for MCO moved out of oversold territory on October 05, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 25 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 18 of the 25 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 72%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 12, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on MCO as a result. In 57 of 89 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for MCO just turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where MCO's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 45 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 62%.
MCO moved above its 50-day moving average on October 21, 2026 date and that indicates a change from a downward trend to an upward trend.
Following a +3.30% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where MCO advanced for three days, in 215 of 350 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 61%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 8 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where MCO declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 53%.
MCO broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for MCO entered a downward trend on October 13, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 16 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating very strong sales and a profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 34 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. MCO’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 54 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating well-balanced risk and returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 76, placing this stock slightly better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 73 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 75 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 98 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: MCO's P/B Ratio (27.540) is very high in comparison to the industry average of (4.019). P/E Ratio (30.427) is within average values for comparable stocks, (17.786). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (1.609) is also within normal values, averaging (1.780). Dividend Yield (0.009) settles around the average of (0.019) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (10.132) is also within normal values, averaging (7.166).
FDS | MCO | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | 12 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 54 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 36 | 16 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 6 | 34 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 28 | 73 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FDS's Valuation (77) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MCO (98). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
MCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FDS (100). This means that MCO’s stock grew somewhat faster than FDS’s over the last 12 months.
MCO's SMR Rating (16) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (36). This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's Price Growth Rating (6) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MCO (34). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.
FDS's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MCO (73). This means that FDS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MCO’s over the last 12 months.
| FDS | MCO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 52% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 64% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 62% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 56% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 55% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 62% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FDS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while MCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FDS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FDS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MCO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +11.14% price change this week, while MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was +1.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was +2.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
FDS is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2026.
MCO is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Financial Publishing/Services (+2.83% weekly)The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| OGN.X | 0.028633 | -0.000806 | -2.74% |
| Origin Protocol cryptocurrency | |||
| SUSHI.X | 0.213024 | -0.012877 | -5.70% |
| SushiSwap cryptocurrency | |||
| KLAY.X | 0.038190 | -0.004083 | -9.66% |
| Klaytn cryptocurrency | |||
| STX.X | 0.321848 | -0.042856 | -11.75% |
| Stacks cryptocurrency | |||
| REP.X | 0.430361 | -0.428484 | -49.89% |
| Augur cryptocurrency | |||