FDS
Price
$266.05
Change
-$11.56 (-4.16%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
9.52B
76 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MCO
Price
$441.59
Change
-$5.77 (-1.29%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
79.68B
19 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FDS vs MCO

FDS vs MCO Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FDS vs. MCO commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FDS is a Hold and MCO is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FDS vs MCO: Fundamental Ratings
FDS
MCO
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1359
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10068
SMR RATING
1..100
3616
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5459
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4474
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8575

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FDS's Valuation (70) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MCO (97). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (100). This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

MCO's SMR Rating (16) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as FDS (36). This means that MCO’s stock grew similarly to FDS’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's Price Growth Rating (54) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MCO (59). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

FDS's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Financial Publishing Or Services industry is in the same range as MCO (74). This means that FDS’s stock grew similarly to MCO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FDSMCO
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (FDS: $277.61 vs. MCO: $447.36)
Brand notoriety: FDS and MCO are both not notable
Both companies represent the Financial Publishing/Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FDS: 156% vs. MCO: 213%
Market capitalization -- FDS: $9.52B vs. MCO: $79.68B
FDS [@Financial Publishing/Services] is valued at $9.52B. MCO’s [@Financial Publishing/Services] market capitalization is $79.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry ranges from $1.27M to $116.72B. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Publishing/Services] industry is $41.08B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FDS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while MCO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FDS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • MCO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the long-term than MCO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FDS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MCO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FDS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MCO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FDS is a better buy in the short-term than MCO.

Price Growth

FDS (@Financial Publishing/Services) experienced а +2.34% price change this week, while MCO (@Financial Publishing/Services) price change was -4.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Publishing/Services industry was -3.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FDS is expected to report earnings on Dec 17, 2026.

MCO is expected to report earnings on Oct 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Publishing/Services (-3.14% weekly)

The financial publishing /services sector includes companies that provide informational products and services that are of value to investors, financial/analytics professionals and other interested readers. The products include real-time stock quotes, financial news and analyses. Think S&P Global, Inc., Moody`s Corporation, Thomson-Reuters Corp and IHS Markit Ltd. Information is critical in making financial or investment decisions, and what makes this industry’s output relevant at all times, across various economic conditions.

View a ticker or compare two or three
FDS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MCO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KNTK51.010.81
+1.61%
Kinetik Holdings
NEN52.00N/A
N/A
New England Realty Associates Limited
WCN150.66-3.27
-2.12%
Waste Connections
LXRX1.82-0.05
-2.93%
Lexicon Pharmaceuticals
SMXT2.11-0.23
-9.83%
Solarmax Technology Inc

FDS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FDS has been loosely correlated with MCO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FDS jumps, then MCO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDS
1D Price
Change %
FDS100%
+2.84%
MCO - FDS
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.49%
SPGI - FDS
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
MSCI - FDS
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.25%
TRU - FDS
50%
Loosely correlated
+1.73%
HLI - FDS
49%
Loosely correlated
+1.61%
More