FENY vs FXN

Key Takeaways

• FENY is a low-cost, passive, market-cap-weighted fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index, while FXN uses a multi-factor, modified equal-weighted AlphaDEX methodology drawn from the Russell 1000 energy universe.
• FENY is heavily concentrated in mega-cap integrated oil majors, with XOM and CVX accounting for more than a third of assets; FXN spreads weight across roughly 40 mid- and large-cap names.
• Cost structures diverge sharply: FENY carries a 0.08% expense ratio, while FXN charges approximately 0.63%.
• FXN offers greater tilts toward independent exploration and production, refining, and natural gas names, whereas FENY reflects the broader market capitalization of the entire U.S. energy complex.
• Both funds are essentially single-sector bets, so their relative positioning hinges more on stock-selection methodology and size exposure than on diversification away from energy itself.

Introduction

Energy remains one of the most cyclically sensitive corners of the equity market, and investors weighing a position in the sector face a meaningful choice between two very different vehicles. FENY and FXN both provide broad U.S. energy exposure, but they are not direct substitutes. One is an ultra-cheap, passive index fund dominated by the largest integrated oil companies; the other is a rules-based, factor-driven strategy that deliberately shifts weight away from mega-caps toward a more evenly distributed roster. Understanding these structural differences matters because they can produce meaningfully different return and volatility profiles even within the same sector. This ETF comparison examines index construction, holdings, costs, sector exposure, and relative positioning.

Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY) Overview

FENY is a passively managed fund that seeks to replicate the MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index, a broad benchmark covering the U.S. energy segment across large-, mid-, and small-capitalization companies. The fund typically holds roughly 100 to 110 securities, but its capital is not spread evenly: because the underlying index weights constituents by market capitalization, the portfolio is dominated by the largest energy supermajors.

Top holdings include XOM (around 22%), CVX (roughly 14%), COP (about 6%), followed by refiners such as MPC and VLO, plus PSX, WMB, EOG, SLB, and KMI. The top ten positions typically represent more than 60% of assets, with large-cap names comprising close to 90% of the portfolio. The fund's expense ratio is a very competitive 0.08%, making it one of the lowest-cost ways to own the U.S. energy sector.

First Trust Energy AlphaDEX Fund (FXN) Overview

FXN is a rules-based, fundamentally driven fund that tracks the StrataQuant Energy AlphaDEX Index. Rather than weighting companies by size, the index uses the AlphaDEX multi-factor selection methodology to rank U.S. energy stocks from the Russell 1000 universe on value and growth criteria, then applies a modified equal-dollar weighting. This produces a more balanced, less mega-cap-heavy portfolio of roughly 40 to 45 holdings.

Because the fund rebalances and re-ranks constituents periodically, its top holdings shift over time; in recent cycles they have included independent producers and refiners such as DVN, FANG, CHRD, OVV, MPC, and VLO, alongside natural gas names such as RRC and AR, and even a clean-energy component such as FSLR. Its expense ratio is approximately 0.63%, reflecting the more active, factor-driven construction.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds operate in the shadow of the same macro forces: crude oil and natural gas price dynamics, OPEC+ supply policy, global demand from transportation and industrial activity, and shifting capital-discipline priorities among producers. In recent market cycles, energy equities have been supported by shareholder-return programs such as buybacks and dividends, disciplined capital spending, and resilient hydrocarbon demand, even as the sector contends with long-term energy-transition narratives and price volatility tied to geopolitical developments.

The distinction between the two funds is most visible here. FENY's mega-cap integrated majors tend to have lower-cost, diversified operations and steadier cash flows, while FXN's roster tilts more heavily toward pure-play exploration and production, refining, and natural gas names that are often more sensitive to commodity-price swings and less insulated by downstream or trading businesses.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

Over recent months and recent market cycles, the two funds have tended to move in the same broad direction, reflecting their shared sector exposure, but with different magnitudes. FENY's heavier weighting in integrated supermajors typically gives it a steadier, more defensive character within energy, as these companies generate cash across upstream, refining, and chemicals operations. FXN, by contrast, has historically exhibited higher volatility owing to its concentration in smaller-capitalization producers and more commodity-levered refiners.

Relative performance between the two has generally hinged on whether investors favor large-cap stability or mid-cap cyclicality. When crude and natural gas prices rise sharply, the more balanced, production-heavy tilt of FXN can amplify upside; during risk-off periods or when integrated majors' diversification is rewarded, FENY has often held up better. Fund performance is therefore less about the sector itself and more about which segment of the energy complex is leading at a given point in the earnings cycle.

AI Screener

Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener is designed to help identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities far more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to streamline your research and surface ideas aligned with your own criteria.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor FENY for most long-term, cost-conscious investors. Its 0.08% expense ratio, broad market-cap coverage, and exposure to financially robust integrated majors offer a more efficient and generally lower-volatility route to sector exposure. That said, the AI framework would recognize that FXN can present a more attractive relative opportunity during periods of strong commodity momentum, when mid-cap producers and refiners tend to outperform. In probabilistic terms, the verdict leans toward FENY for core portfolio exposure and FXN as a tactical, higher-volatility complement for investors seeking factor-driven, more balanced single-stock weighting.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations