FER
Price
$65.42
Change
+$0.30 (+0.46%)
Updated
Jul 31, 02:53 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
46.58B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
STRL
Price
$611.15
Change
+$30.42 (+5.24%)
Updated
Jul 31, 03:04 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.82B
3 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FER vs STRL

FER vs STRL Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ferrovial (FER) vs. Sterling Infrastructure (STRL) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both FER and STRL operate in the engineering and construction sector, with exposure to infrastructure development and transportation projects.
  • FER has demonstrated steady positioning through recent U.S. project wins, supporting relative stability in market activity over recent weeks.
  • STRL has shown strong revenue and earnings growth in prior quarters, though recent trading sessions reflect higher volatility.
  • Sector tailwinds from infrastructure demand provide a common backdrop, while differences in geographic focus and project scale create distinct risk-return profiles.
  • Market sentiment for both remains influenced by broader economic indicators and government spending trends in transportation and energy infrastructure.
  • Relative performance highlights trade-offs between established international operations at FER and domestic growth momentum at STRL.

Introduction

This comparison examines FER and STRL, two companies in the engineering and construction industry with significant infrastructure exposure. The analysis focuses on recent market behavior, business models, and positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating relative opportunities in the current environment. Professionals monitoring sector rotation, growth catalysts, or risk diversification may find the comparison relevant, as both stocks respond to similar macroeconomic drivers such as public infrastructure investment and economic expansion.

FER Overview and Recent Performance

Ferrovial N.V. develops, constructs, and operates transportation infrastructure, including highways and airports, with operations spanning North America, Europe, and other regions. The company maintains segments in construction, highways, airports, and energy. In recent market activity, FER has benefited from additional major U.S. infrastructure project awards, contributing to positive sentiment. Stock behavior has reflected measured responses to these developments amid broader sector trends, with performance influenced by ongoing demand for toll roads and related assets. Recent weeks have shown resilience tied to project pipelines rather than sharp single-event moves.

STRL Overview and Recent Performance

Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. provides construction solutions focused on infrastructure projects, primarily in the United States, following its rebranding to emphasize broader capabilities. The company has reported substantial year-over-year revenue and earnings increases in recent reporting periods, driven by infrastructure spending. In recent market activity, STRL has experienced notable price fluctuations, including periods of strong upward movement followed by corrections. Sentiment has been shaped by growth metrics and sector tailwinds, with performance reflecting both expansion opportunities and typical volatility associated with smaller-capitalization names in the space.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available on the platform. These bots trade thousands of different tickers across varied strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, yet only those best suited to prevailing market conditions appear in the trending section. Available bots span diverse metrics, including win rates often ranging from 50% to over 70% in optimized scenarios, alongside varying drawdown levels and return profiles depending on the specific algorithm. Readers interested in automated strategies can explore the full range of options and their historical statistics directly on the platform.

Head-to-Head Comparison

FER operates with a larger international footprint and established toll-road assets, offering potentially greater stability compared to STRL’s more concentrated U.S. construction focus. Growth drivers for FER center on long-term infrastructure concessions, while STRL benefits from shorter-cycle project execution and reported rapid revenue expansion. Recent momentum has favored project announcements at FER for steadier sentiment, whereas STRL has displayed sharper swings tied to earnings surprises. Risk factors include regulatory and currency exposure for FER versus execution and cyclical demand sensitivity for STRL. Both maintain sector exposure to engineering and construction, though market positioning differs in scale and geographic diversification.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency and recent project catalysts, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probability of favorable positioning to FER in the near term. The company’s international infrastructure portfolio and recent U.S. wins provide a foundation for more stable relative performance compared to the higher volatility observed in STRL. This assessment reflects probabilistic evaluation of momentum and risk factors rather than a definitive outcome.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FER vs. STRL commentary
Jul 31, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FER is a StrongBuy and STRL is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 31, 2026
Stock price -- (FER: $65.12 vs. STRL: $580.73)
Brand notoriety: FER and STRL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FER: 106% vs. STRL: 83%
Market capitalization -- FER: $46.58B vs. STRL: $17.82B
FER [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $46.58B. STRL’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $17.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FER’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSTRL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FER’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • STRL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, STRL is a better buy in the long-term than FER.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FER’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while STRL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FER’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • STRL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FER is a better buy in the short-term than STRL.

Price Growth

FER (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +2.88% price change this week, while STRL (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -19.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

FER is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

STRL is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-2.22% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FER($46.6B) has a higher market cap than STRL($17.8B). FER has higher P/E ratio than STRL: FER (68.91) vs STRL (51.90). STRL YTD gains are higher at: 89.638 vs. FER (0.789). FER has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.21B vs. STRL (590M). FER has more cash in the bank: 4.24B vs. STRL (512M). STRL has less debt than FER: STRL (342M) vs FER (10.7B). FER has higher revenues than STRL: FER (9.67B) vs STRL (2.89B).
FERSTRLFER / STRL
Capitalization46.6B17.8B262%
EBITDA1.21B590M205%
Gain YTD0.78989.6381%
P/E Ratio68.9151.90133%
Revenue9.67B2.89B335%
Total Cash4.24B512M829%
Total Debt10.7B342M3,129%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
STRL: Fundamental Ratings
STRL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
65
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
44
SMR RATING
1..100
28
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FERSTRL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FER
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
STRL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKR59.901.18
+2.01%
Baker Hughes Company
NTSK12.100.14
+1.17%
Netskope Inc.
RHLD126.72-0.21
-0.17%
Resolute Holdings Management
SRI7.07-0.03
-0.42%
Stoneridge
GIGM1.30-0.03
-2.26%
GigaMedia Limited

FER and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FER has been loosely correlated with IESC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FER jumps, then IESC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FER
1D Price
Change %
FER100%
+4.13%
IESC - FER
47%
Loosely correlated
+15.18%
STRL - FER
47%
Loosely correlated
+17.50%
ROAD - FER
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
APG - FER
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.95%
TPC - FER
44%
Loosely correlated
+8.61%
More

STRL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, STRL has been closely correlated with IESC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if STRL jumps, then IESC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To STRL
1D Price
Change %
STRL100%
+17.50%
IESC - STRL
70%
Closely correlated
+15.18%
FIX - STRL
69%
Closely correlated
+11.70%
ECG - STRL
66%
Closely correlated
+12.61%
PWR - STRL
66%
Loosely correlated
+17.26%
EME - STRL
66%
Loosely correlated
+19.32%
More