Advertisement
FERG vs GLO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FERG is a Hold and GLO is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FERG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while.
- FERG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FERG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- FERG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FERG (@Electronics Distributors) experienced а -6.49% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronics Distributors industry was -5.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.18%.
Reported Earning Dates
FERG is expected to report earnings on Dec 09, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronics Distributors (-5.17% weekly)Electronics distributors are companies that are involved in distribution of one or more of the following: electronic components, computer products/ peripherals and software products & services. Several electronics distributors are also becoming the point of contact for technical/pre- & post-sale support in many cases, in an attempt to bolster their position in the market. Tariffs and/or cross-border trade barriers are some of the potential threats to the electronics supply chain, but that could also potentially lead to re-directing to markets where tariffs/restrictions are lower depending on demand. The industry is also vulnerable in the event of economic slowdowns. Arrow Electronics, Inc., SYNNEX Corporation and Versum Materials, Inc. are some of the major electronics distributors in the U.S.
FERG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 82 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 29 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FERG | GLO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 49% | 1 day ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 60% | 1 day ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 10 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 85% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| IJT | 134.64 | 0.07 | +0.05% |
| iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Growth ETF | |||
| GXUS | 53.82 | N/A | N/A |
| Goldman Sachs MarketBeta(R) Ttl IntEqETF | |||
| SJLD | 25.53 | N/A | N/A |
| SanJac Alpha Low Duration ETF | |||
| WANT | 42.36 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Direxion Daily Cnsmr Discret Bull 3X ETF | |||
| SMOG | 129.22 | -1.22 | -0.93% |
| VanEck Low Carbon Energy ETF | |||
FERG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FERG has been loosely correlated with CNM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FERG jumps, then CNM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FERG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FERG | 100% | +0.07% | ||
| CNM - FERG | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.70% | ||
| SITE - FERG | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.77% | ||
| AIT - FERG | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.49% | ||
| FAST - FERG | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.00% | ||
| WSO - FERG | 51% Loosely correlated | -1.34% | ||
More | ||||
GLO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that GLO and LRCX have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GLO and LRCX's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GLO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GLO | 100% | +0.36% | ||
| LRCX - GLO | 11% Poorly correlated | +3.88% | ||
| AIR - GLO | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.03% | ||
| DKNG - GLO | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.19% | ||
| FERG - GLO | 5% Poorly correlated | +0.07% | ||
| BA - GLO | 3% Poorly correlated | -2.07% | ||
More | ||||