Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBCX
FFAMX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBCX
FFAMX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBCX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FFAMX (10.9B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FFAMX (1.91) vs RLBCX (1.52). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FFAMX (20 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). RLBCX (0.89) and FFAMX (0.85) have similar cost to investors . RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAMX (25.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBCX (250). RLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.52 vs. FFAMX (13.61). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 34.80 vs. FFAMX (18.92).
| FFAMX | RLBCX | FFAMX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.89 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.89 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.593 | 8.679 | 99% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 288B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.91 | 1.52 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.61 | 15.52 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.19 | 40.85 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.92 | 34.80 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.68 | 83.27 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement