Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFAMX vs RLBCX
FFAMX vs RLBCX Comparison
Open Charts FFAMX vs RLBCX
FFAMX vs RLBCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFAMX vs. RLBCX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFAMX is a Hold and RLBCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FFAMX (10.9B). FFAMX pays higher dividends than RLBCX: FFAMX (1.82) vs RLBCX (1.52). FFAMX was incepted earlier than RLBCX: FFAMX (20 years) vs RLBCX (24 years). RLBCX (0.89) and FFAMX (0.85) have similar cost to investors . RLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFAMX (25.00). FFAMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBCX: FFAMX (0) vs RLBCX (250). FFAMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.56 vs. RLBCX (5.28). RLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.44 vs. FFAMX (14.48).
| FFAMX | RLBCX | FFAMX / RLBCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.82 | 0.89 | 92% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.85 | 0.89 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.116 | 7.449 | 109% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.9B | 285B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.52 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.56 | 5.28 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.19 | 39.23 | 85% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.48 | 28.44 | 51% |
| Returns for 10 years | 59.47 | 78.83 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers