32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FFLS vs PWR
FFLS vs PWR Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs PWR
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$23.32
Change+$0.07 (+0.30%)
Volume$2.22K
Net Assets34.39M
Quanta Services
Price$337.46
Change+$1.27 (+0.38%)
Volume$1.36M
Capitalization49.81B
FFLS vs PWR Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. PWR commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Hold and PWR is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
PWR: Fundamental Ratings
PWR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 39 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 21 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 79% | 11 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 65% | 11 days ago 65% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 58% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 58% | 11 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 88% | 13 days ago 75% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 53% | 11 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 90% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 60% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.28% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 63% Loosely correlated | +3.10% | ||
| ASML - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.81% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 54% Loosely correlated | +3.07% | ||
| PWR - FFLS | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| NFLX - FFLS | 50% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
More | ||||
PWR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with PRIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then PRIM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PWR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PWR | 100% | +0.38% | ||
| PRIM - PWR | 69% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| EME - PWR | 64% Loosely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| MTZ - PWR | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.21% | ||
| STRL - PWR | 61% Loosely correlated | +2.26% | ||
| ACA - PWR | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.96% | ||
More | ||||