Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGADX vs RYZCX
FGADX vs RYZCX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs RYZCX
FGADX vs RYZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. RYZCX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a Hold and RYZCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 3.44B vs. RYZCX (131M). FGADX pays higher dividends than RYZCX: FGADX (8.48) vs RYZCX (3.65). FGADX was incepted earlier than RYZCX: FGADX (30 years) vs RYZCX (25 years). RYZCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.62). RYZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 328.00 vs. FGADX (22.76). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYZCX: FGADX (0) vs RYZCX (2500). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 49.13 vs. RYZCX (36.18). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 236.88 vs. RYZCX (147.72).
| FGADX | RYZCX | FGADX / RYZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.28 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.33 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.584 | 11.028 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.44B | 131M | 2,624% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.48 | 3.65 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 49.13 | 36.18 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 317.83 | 202.83 | 157% |
| Returns for 5 years | 236.88 | 147.72 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | 326.08 | 173.74 | 188% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement