Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGADX vs RYZCX
FGADX vs RYZCX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs RYZCX
FGADX vs RYZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. RYZCX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a Buy and RYZCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 3.13B vs. RYZCX (150M). FGADX pays higher dividends than RYZCX: FGADX (9.06) vs RYZCX (3.96). FGADX was incepted earlier than RYZCX: FGADX (29 years) vs RYZCX (25 years). RYZCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.62). RYZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 452.00 vs. FGADX (22.76). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYZCX: FGADX (0) vs RYZCX (2500). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 79.15 vs. RYZCX (66.13). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 174.45 vs. RYZCX (94.45).
| FGADX | RYZCX | FGADX / RYZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.28 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.33 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.352 | -0.199 | 177% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.13B | 150M | 2,083% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.06 | 3.96 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | 79.15 | 66.13 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 261.53 | 172.21 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 174.45 | 94.45 | 185% |
| Returns for 10 years | 284.80 | 140.96 | 202% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement