Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGADX vs RYZCX
FGADX vs RYZCX Comparison
Open Charts FGADX vs RYZCX
FGADX vs RYZCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGADX vs. RYZCX commentary
Aug 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGADX is a Buy and RYZCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FGADX has more cash in the bank: 3.35B vs. RYZCX (129M). FGADX pays higher dividends than RYZCX: FGADX (11.18) vs RYZCX (4.88). FGADX was incepted earlier than RYZCX: FGADX (30 years) vs RYZCX (25 years). RYZCX (2.33) is less costly to investors than FGADX (0.62). RYZCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 328.00 vs. FGADX (22.76). FGADX has a lower initial minimum investment than RYZCX: FGADX (0) vs RYZCX (2500). FGADX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 80.73 vs. RYZCX (57.27). FGADX return over 5 years is better than : 209.84 vs. RYZCX (122.79).
| FGADX | RYZCX | FGADX / RYZCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.28 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 2.33 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.759 | 6.946 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.35B | 129M | 2,595% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 11.18 | 4.88 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | 80.73 | 57.27 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 292.56 | 190.76 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 209.84 | 122.79 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 250.33 | 115.91 | 216% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement