Investors seeking gold-related exposure often evaluate physical commodity vehicles against equity-based alternatives. Franklin Responsibly Sourced Gold ETF (FGDL) and Sprott Gold Miners ETF (SGDM) address overlapping yet differentiated goals within the precious metals space. FGDL tracks physical gold prices, while SGDM focuses on gold mining equities. This comparison highlights structural distinctions, risk profiles, and positioning relevant for portfolio allocation decisions in the current market environment.
FGDL is a grantor trust that seeks to reflect the performance of the LBMA Gold Price, less expenses. The fund holds physical gold bullion sourced responsibly in accordance with LBMA guidelines. It maintains one primary holding (gold), resulting in 100% allocation to the precious metals commodity. The expense ratio stands at 0.15%. As a passive, physically backed vehicle, FGDL requires no active rebalancing beyond storage and custody considerations. Liquidity remains supported by its structure as an exchange-traded product on NYSE American.
SGDM tracks the Solactive Gold Miners Custom Factors Index, which selects and weights larger gold mining companies primarily listed on Canadian and U.S. exchanges. The fund typically holds around 40 stocks, with top positions including major producers such as Agnico Eagle Mines, Newmont, and Wheaton Precious Metals. Sector allocation concentrates in materials, specifically gold mining equities. The expense ratio is 0.46%. The index applies quarterly reconstitution using fundamental factors including revenue growth, free cash flow yield, and debt-to-equity ratios, resulting in a rules-based active tilt within a passive framework.
The gold sector benefits from macroeconomic factors such as inflation hedging, central bank purchases, and geopolitical uncertainty. Capital flows into both physical gold and mining equities respond to interest rate expectations and currency movements. Regulatory developments around responsible sourcing influence physical gold products, while mining companies face operational risks including labor costs, permitting, and environmental compliance. Sector rotation often favors gold assets during periods of equity market volatility or monetary policy shifts.
In recent market cycles, FGDL has exhibited price movements closely aligned with gold spot prices, offering lower correlation to equity markets. SGDM has shown amplified sensitivity to gold price trends due to mining leverage, accompanied by higher volatility from company-specific factors. Relative positioning favors FGDL for cost-efficient, direct commodity exposure, while SGDM provides potential upside from operational improvements in top holdings during favorable gold price environments.
Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Visit the AI Screener to explore current opportunities.
Based on structural strength, lower expense ratio, and direct commodity exposure without equity-specific risks, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign higher probabilistic favor to FGDL for investors prioritizing cost efficiency and pure gold price tracking. SGDM remains relevant for those seeking diversified equity participation in the gold mining sector with fundamental factor emphasis.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
FGDL saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 22, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 47 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 37 of the 47 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 79%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 34 of 52 cases where FGDL's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 65%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on FGDL as a result. In 47 of 76 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 62%.
FGDL moved below its 50-day moving average on September 23, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for FGDL crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 8 of 11 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 73%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FGDL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 63%.
The Aroon Indicator for FGDL entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Following a +2.43% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FGDL advanced for three days, in 230 of 277 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 83%.
FGDL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
SGDM saw its Moving Average Convergence Divergence Histogram (MACD) turn negative on October 22, 2026. This is a bearish signal that suggests the stock could decline going forward. Tickeron's A.I.dvisor looked at 49 instances where the indicator turned negative. In 45 of the 49 cases the stock moved lower in the days that followed. This puts the odds of a downward move at 90%.
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 65 of 74 cases where SGDM's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The Momentum Indicator moved below the 0 level on October 22, 2026. You may want to consider selling the stock, shorting the stock, or exploring put options on SGDM as a result. In 75 of 84 cases where the Momentum Indicator fell below 0, the stock fell further within the subsequent month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 89%.
SGDM moved below its 50-day moving average on September 28, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
The 10-day moving average for SGDM crossed bearishly below the 50-day moving average on October 05, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted lower and could be considered a sell signal. In 11 of 13 past instances when the 10-day crossed below the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 85%.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where SGDM declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 88%.
The Aroon Indicator for SGDM entered a downward trend on October 22, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
The 50-day moving average for SGDM moved above the 200-day moving average on September 28, 2026. This could be a long-term bullish signal for the stock as the stock shifts to an upward trend.
Following a +5.90% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where SGDM advanced for three days, in 292 of 319 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 90%.
SGDM may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
| FGDL | SGDM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 89% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 63% | 4 days ago 88% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 89% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SGDM has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 96% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SGDM jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SGDM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SGDM | 100% | -6.16% | ||
| AEM - SGDM | 96% Closely correlated | -5.98% | ||
| WPM - SGDM | 95% Closely correlated | -6.54% | ||
| IAG - SGDM | 93% Closely correlated | -7.86% | ||
| NEM - SGDM | 93% Closely correlated | -2.62% | ||
| PAAS - SGDM | 91% Closely correlated | -5.91% | ||
More | ||||