Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFQX vs MSNCX
FGFQX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FGFQX vs MSNCX
FGFQX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFQX vs. MSNCX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFQX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 557M vs. FGFQX (256M). MSNCX (3.41) and FGFQX (3.36) have matching dividends . FGFQX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FGFQX (9 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FGFQX (0.62). FGFQX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 10.73 vs. MSNCX (6.00). FGFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSNCX: FGFQX (0) vs MSNCX (1000). FGFQX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.58 vs. MSNCX (4.10). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.15 vs. FGFQX (-2.69).
| FGFQX | MSNCX | FGFQX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.84 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.86 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.156 | -0.492 | 32% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 256M | 557M | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.36 | 3.41 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.58 | 4.10 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.59 | 10.16 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.69 | 0.15 | -1,787% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 11.59 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement