Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FGFQX vs MSNCX
FGFQX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FGFQX vs MSNCX
FGFQX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FGFQX vs. MSNCX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FGFQX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 570M vs. FGFQX (264M). MSNCX (3.29) and FGFQX (3.24) have matching dividends . FGFQX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FGFQX (9 years) vs MSNCX (42 years). MSNCX (0.86) is less costly to investors than FGFQX (0.61). MSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FGFQX (10.73). FGFQX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSNCX: FGFQX (0) vs MSNCX (1000). FGFQX (8.20) and MSNCX (8.08) have marching annual gain over last year. MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 3.22 vs. FGFQX (-0.09).
| FGFQX | MSNCX | FGFQX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.84 | 73% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.86 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 42 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.032 | 2.032 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 264M | 570M | 46% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.24 | 3.29 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.20 | 8.08 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.62 | 11.55 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.09 | 3.22 | -3% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 15.65 | - |