FHI
Price
$57.20
Change
+$1.30 (+2.33%)
Updated
Jun 4, 04:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.24B
49 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
HNNA
Price
$9.96
Change
+$0.07 (+0.71%)
Updated
Jun 4, 01:09 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
78.23M
63 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FHI vs HNNA

Header iconFHI vs HNNA Comparison
Open Charts FHI vs HNNABanner chart's image
FHI vs HNNA Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FHI vs. HNNA commentary
Jun 04, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FHI is a StrongBuy and HNNA is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 04, 2026
Stock price -- (FHI: $55.90 vs. HNNA: $9.90)
Brand notoriety: FHI and HNNA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FHI: 104% vs. HNNA: 112%
Market capitalization -- FHI: $4.24B vs. HNNA: $78.23M
FHI [@Investment Managers] is valued at $4.24B. HNNA’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $78.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $158.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $8.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FHI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHNNA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FHI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HNNA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FHI is a better buy in the long-term than HNNA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FHI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HNNA’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FHI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HNNA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HNNA is a better buy in the short-term than FHI.

Price Growth

FHI (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.74% price change this week, while HNNA (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

FHI is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2026.

HNNA is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.28% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHI($4.24B) has a higher market cap than HNNA($78.2M). FHI has higher P/E ratio than HNNA: FHI (10.85) vs HNNA (9.34). FHI YTD gains are higher at: 8.818 vs. HNNA (6.239). FHI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 576M vs. HNNA (14M). FHI has more cash in the bank: 645M vs. HNNA (565K). HNNA has less debt than FHI: HNNA (40.5M) vs FHI (451M). FHI has higher revenues than HNNA: FHI (1.86B) vs HNNA (33M).
FHIHNNAFHI / HNNA
Capitalization4.24B78.2M5,427%
EBITDA576M14M4,114%
Gain YTD8.8186.239141%
P/E Ratio10.859.34116%
Revenue1.86B33M5,624%
Total Cash645M565K114,159%
Total Debt451M40.5M1,114%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FHI vs HNNA: Fundamental Ratings
FHI
HNNA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2422
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
9
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1558
SMR RATING
1..100
3077
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5944
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5013

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HNNA's Valuation (9) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHI (74) in the null industry. This means that HNNA’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHI’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNNA (58) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNNA’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's SMR Rating (30) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HNNA (77) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew somewhat faster than HNNA’s over the last 12 months.

FHI's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as HNNA (56) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that FHI’s stock grew similarly to HNNA’s over the last 12 months.

HNNA's P/E Growth Rating (44) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as FHI (59) in the null industry. This means that HNNA’s stock grew similarly to FHI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FHIHNNA
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
51%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FHI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
HNNA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SHPAX20.50N/A
N/A
Saratoga Health & Biotechnology A
PNORX118.42N/A
N/A
Putnam Sustainable Leaders R
TRREX11.67N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Real Estate
TVRAX19.15N/A
N/A
NAA Allocation A
VMCCX47.73N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core C

HNNA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that HNNA and NTRSO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HNNA and NTRSO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HNNA
1D Price
Change %
HNNA100%
-0.80%
NTRSO - HNNA
26%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
AURE - HNNA
25%
Poorly correlated
-5.14%
FHI - HNNA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.37%
FSK - HNNA
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
MSIF - HNNA
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.57%
More