Advertisement
FIGS vs SHOO
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIGS is a Hold and SHOO is a Hold.
| FIGS | SHOO | FIGS / SHOO | |
| Capitalization | 2.22B | 3.14B | 71% |
| EBITDA | 78.9M | 244M | 32% |
| Gain YTD | 17.518 | 4.755 | 368% |
| P/E Ratio | 40.45 | 21.46 | 188% |
| Revenue | 710M | 2.74B | 26% |
| Total Cash | 296M | 123M | 241% |
| Total Debt | 57.7M | 377M | 15% |
SHOO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 71 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 18 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FIGS | SHOO | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 70% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 20 days ago 78% | 9 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 12 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIGS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while SHOO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FIGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- SHOO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIGS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SHOO’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SHOO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FIGS (@Apparel/Footwear) experienced а -7.42% price change this week, while SHOO (@Wholesale Distributors) price change was -1.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -5.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.69%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.16%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was -2.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.52%.
Reported Earning Dates
FIGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2026.
SHOO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Apparel/Footwear (-5.16% weekly)Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
@Wholesale Distributors (-2.22% weekly)Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TPSC | 46.71 | 0.19 | +0.42% |
| Timothy Plan US Small Cap Core ETF | |||
| FTPA | 8.32 | 0.01 | +0.18% |
| Franklin Pennsylvania Municipal Inc ETF | |||
| BREE | 27.86 | N/A | N/A |
| MFS Blended Research Em Mkts Eq ETF | |||
| BNDW | 66.47 | -0.02 | -0.03% |
| Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | |||
| RNTY | 47.45 | -0.11 | -0.23% |
| Yieldmax Target 12 Real Estate Option Income ETF | |||
FIGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIGS has been loosely correlated with CAL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIGS jumps, then CAL could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIGS | 100% | +3.09% | ||
| CAL - FIGS | 36% Loosely correlated | +5.93% | ||
| WWW - FIGS | 36% Loosely correlated | +3.32% | ||
| SHOO - FIGS | 35% Loosely correlated | +3.82% | ||
| UAA - FIGS | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.82% | ||
| CROX - FIGS | 31% Poorly correlated | +3.35% | ||
More | ||||
SHOO and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SHOO has been loosely correlated with OXM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SHOO jumps, then OXM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SHOO | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHOO | 100% | +3.82% | ||
| OXM - SHOO | 64% Loosely correlated | +1.87% | ||
| KTB - SHOO | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.70% | ||
| COLM - SHOO | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| LEVI - SHOO | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
| CAL - SHOO | 58% Loosely correlated | +5.93% | ||
More | ||||