Advertisement
FIP vs NNBR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FIP is a Buy and NNBR is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FIP’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNNBR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FIP’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NNBR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FIP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NNBR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FIP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- NNBR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FIP (@Industrial Conglomerates) experienced а -11.82% price change this week, while NNBR (@Industrial Conglomerates) price change was -6.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Conglomerates industry was -2.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.63%.
Reported Earning Dates
FIP is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
NNBR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Industrial Conglomerates (-2.69% weekly)Industrial Conglomerates specialize in numerous types of products, most of which comprise industrial goods, while some also go towards meeting household needs. Honeywell (makes engineering services and aerospace systems), United Technologies Corporation(manufactures aircraft engines, aerospace systems, HVAC, elevators and escalators, fire and security, building systems, and industrial products, among others), 3M (over 60,000 products under several world-renowned brands, including adhesives, abrasives, laminates, passive fire protection, personal protective equipment, window films, paint protection films, dental and orthodontic products, electrical & electronic connecting and insulating materials, medical products, car-care products, electronic circuits, healthcare software and optical films).
| FIP | NNBR | FIP / NNBR | |
| Capitalization | 441M | 255M | 173% |
| EBITDA | 106M | 18.1M | 586% |
| Gain YTD | -18.090 | 158.594 | -11% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 595M | 435M | 137% |
| Total Cash | 37.9M | 8.47M | 447% |
| Total Debt | 3.91B | 211M | 1,853% |
NNBR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 83 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FIP | NNBR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 76% | 4 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 82% | 8 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 76% | 6 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 5 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 84% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| CGCIX | 15.23 | 0.11 | +0.73% |
| Calamos Global Opportunities I | |||
| SMDVX | 20.90 | 0.13 | +0.63% |
| Hartford Schroders US MidCap Opps A | |||
| WCMRX | 27.55 | 0.15 | +0.55% |
| WCM Focused International Growth Inv | |||
| PABYX | 17.92 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| Franklin Dynamic Asset Allocation Bal Y | |||
| JNVIX | 16.95 | -0.01 | -0.06% |
| Jensen Quality Mid Cap I | |||
FIP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FIP has been loosely correlated with MLI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FIP jumps, then MLI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FIP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FIP | 100% | -6.75% | ||
| MLI - FIP | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| IIIN - FIP | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| HON - FIP | 34% Loosely correlated | +0.47% | ||
| NWPX - FIP | 33% Poorly correlated | -2.99% | ||
| GFF - FIP | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.97% | ||
More | ||||
NNBR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that NNBR and FIP have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that NNBR and FIP's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NNBR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NNBR | 100% | -0.90% | ||
| FIP - NNBR | 23% Poorly correlated | -6.75% | ||
| WOR - NNBR | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.01% | ||
| OTTR - NNBR | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.10% | ||
| ESAB - NNBR | 21% Poorly correlated | +1.10% | ||
| TG - NNBR | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.93% | ||
More | ||||