GVA
Price
$127.10
Change
+$3.46 (+2.80%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
5.56B
68 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PWR
Price
$685.78
Change
+$13.00 (+1.93%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
103.1B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

GVA vs PWR

GVA vs PWR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 27, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Granite Construction (GVA) vs. Quanta Services (PWR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Granite Construction (GVA) and Quanta Services (PWR) both operate in the U.S. infrastructure sector but serve fundamentally different markets — GVA focuses on heavy civil construction and materials, while PWR dominates specialized energy and utility infrastructure.
  • PWR's market capitalization of approximately $94 billion dwarfs GVA's roughly $5.5 billion, reflecting vastly different scale, revenue bases, and institutional footprints.
  • GVA has recently faced analyst headwinds, including a Goldman Sachs downgrade to Sell, while PWR enjoys a consensus Moderate Buy rating and has raised full-year guidance.
  • PWR's record backlog of $48.5 billion and surging data-center-related demand provide powerful secular tailwinds; GVA's growth is more dependent on public infrastructure funding cycles.
  • Both stocks have pulled back from recent highs over the past month, but PWR's year-to-date gain of roughly 48% far exceeds GVA's more modest single-digit advance.
  • AI-driven analysis tends to favor stocks with stronger trend consistency, robust backlog visibility, and favorable earnings revision momentum — factors where PWR currently holds an edge.

Introduction

Comparing GVA (Granite Construction Incorporated) and PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) places two infrastructure-focused companies under the same analytical lens, yet their business profiles diverge significantly. Granite Construction is a century-old heavy civil contractor and construction materials producer deeply tied to U.S. transportation and public works spending. Quanta Services is a specialty infrastructure giant serving the electric power, pipeline, energy, and communications markets — sectors currently riding powerful demand waves from electrification, grid modernization, and artificial intelligence (AI) data-center buildouts. This comparison is relevant for investors evaluating exposure to infrastructure and industrials but who need to understand the stark differences in scale, growth drivers, risk profiles, and market sentiment between these two names.

GVA Overview and Recent Performance

GVA, Granite Construction Incorporated, is one of the largest diversified civil contractors and construction materials companies in the United States. Founded in 1922 and headquartered in Watsonville, California, the company self-identifies as "America's Infrastructure Company." Its business spans transportation infrastructure (highways, bridges, airports), water infrastructure, and materials production — including aggregate mining, asphalt, and ready-mix concrete. Granite operates a vertically integrated model, supplying its own construction projects with internally sourced materials, which can support project-level margins.

In recent market activity, GVA shares have experienced notable volatility. After reaching an all-time high above $160 in late June 2026, the stock retreated considerably, settling near $124–$125 by late July — a pullback of approximately 18% over the past month. Year-to-date, GVA remains modestly positive with a gain of approximately 8%, though this trails broader industrial benchmarks. The stock's 52-week range spans from roughly $90 to $162, illustrating the wide swings characteristic of mid-cap construction names.

On the operational front, Granite has continued to secure new project awards. Notable recent wins include a $116.9 million contract for the West Davis Corridor expansion in Utah, a preconstruction CMAR (Construction Manager at Risk) contract for the Keystone Avenue Bridge replacement in Reno, Nevada, a $41 million roadway project in Orange County, Florida, and a $50 million dam spillway replacement project for PG&E in California. These awards underscore Granite's competitive positioning in Western and Sunbelt public infrastructure markets. However, Goldman Sachs downgraded GVA to Sell from Neutral in early July 2026, citing expectations of decelerating real public construction spending as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act winds down, along with concerns about sustaining book-to-bill momentum. Conversely, Stephens initiated coverage with an Overweight rating and a $180 price target, highlighting a more constructive infrastructure outlook. GVA's forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 19 reflects a relatively undemanding valuation compared to the broader industrial sector.

PWR Overview and Recent Performance

PWR, Quanta Services, Inc., is a Houston-based industry leader in specialized infrastructure solutions for the utility, power generation, communications, pipeline, and energy industries. The company provides comprehensive engineering, procurement, construction, installation, maintenance, and repair services that support the development and modernization of critical energy and communications networks. Quanta operates across the United States, Canada, Australia, and select international markets, with roughly 93% of revenue generated domestically.

Quanta Services has delivered exceptional financial momentum in recent quarters. In the first quarter of 2026, the company reported revenues of $7.87 billion — a 26.3% year-over-year increase — along with adjusted diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $2.68, which surpassed consensus estimates by a wide margin. Total backlog reached a record $48.5 billion, and remaining performance obligations (RPO) stood at $26.2 billion, providing substantial multi-year revenue visibility. The company also raised its full-year 2026 guidance: revenues are now expected between $34.7 billion and $35.2 billion, with adjusted EPS of $13.55 to $14.25.

PWR shares have surged roughly 48% year-to-date, dramatically outperforming both the S&P 500 and the broader construction sector. However, like GVA, PWR has experienced a recent pullback, declining approximately 11% over the past month from levels near $702 to roughly $626. The stock's 52-week range spans from $363 to nearly $789. The company's leadership has been active on capital allocation, authorizing a new $1 billion share repurchase program in May 2026 and paying a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Analyst consensus leans decidedly favorable: with 17 Buy ratings and 9 Hold ratings, PWR carries a Moderate Buy consensus and an average price target in the $745–$752 range. Key growth catalysts include accelerating demand for electric transmission infrastructure, grid modernization, renewable integration, and — critically — power infrastructure for AI data centers, a market management has identified as a major multi-year growth engine.

Trending AI Robots

For traders seeking to navigate the diverging trajectories of stocks like GVA and PWR, Tickeron offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots on its Trending AI Robots page. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across multiple market environments, but only the strongest and most market-appropriate strategies earn placement in this curated section. These bots span diverse trading styles — from short-term swing trading and momentum plays to longer-duration trend-following approaches — each with distinct timeframes, performance metrics, risk parameters, and ticker-specific focus. Some bots feature annualized returns that have outpaced broad market indexes by significant margins, while others emphasize capital preservation and lower drawdowns. A quick scan of the Trending AI Robots page reveals key statistics such as win rates, Sharpe ratios, total trades closed, and equity curves, empowering traders to evaluate which automated strategy may align with their objectives. Whether one is monitoring infrastructure names or exploring entirely different sectors, the Trending AI Robots page provides a practical starting point for discovering algorithmic trading strategies suited to current conditions.

Head-to-Head Comparison

The most striking contrast between GVA and PWR is sheer scale. Quanta Services generates annual revenues approaching $35 billion — roughly eight times Granite Construction's approximately $4.4 billion — and commands a market capitalization nearly 17 times larger. This scale difference translates into meaningfully different business dynamics: PWR benefits from a massive, diversified backlog across electric power and energy markets with secular demand tailwinds, while GVA's growth is more cyclical and dependent on public infrastructure appropriations and state-level transportation budgets.

Growth drivers also diverge sharply. PWR sits at the center of several converging megatrends — electrification, grid hardening, renewable energy integration, and the rapid expansion of power-hungry AI data centers. These forces have propelled its backlog to record levels and supported aggressive upward guidance revisions. GVA, by contrast, is more tethered to traditional transportation and water infrastructure spending, where forward visibility is clouded by the eventual expiration of federal stimulus programs and early signs of decelerating highway project commitments in its home markets.

Risk profiles differ as well. GVA faces potential demand headwinds as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act's funding cycle matures; analysts have flagged that sustaining strong book-to-bill ratios may prove challenging. Additionally, approximately 9% of GVA's backlog is tied to Tactical Infrastructure work for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, an area where incremental project wins are not expected beyond 2026. PWR's risks center more on execution at scale — managing a $48.5 billion backlog across thousands of projects, navigating permitting and regulatory hurdles, and handling potential cost inflation on fixed-price components — alongside a premium valuation that leaves less room for disappointment. PWR's trailing P/E ratio of approximately 86 and forward P/E near 45 reflect the market's elevated growth expectations.

Market sentiment currently favors PWR. While both stocks have experienced recent weakness, PWR's institutional ownership of over 90%, consistent earnings beats, upward estimate revisions, and powerful secular narrative have sustained a broadly positive analyst consensus. GVA faces a more mixed outlook, with downgrades from influential firms offsetting more optimistic voices on the buy side.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend signals, earnings momentum, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely favor PWR over GVA in the current environment. PWR's combination of record backlog, accelerating revenue growth, consistent upward earnings revisions, powerful secular demand catalysts tied to electrification and data-center buildouts, and a constructive analyst consensus creates a more compelling trend-stability profile. GVA's recent contract wins demonstrate continued operational competence, but the Goldman Sachs downgrade, concerns about the public spending cycle, and more modest growth trajectory weigh on its relative positioning. That said, GVA's significantly lower valuation — a forward P/E roughly one-third of PWR's — might appeal to value-oriented strategies, and the AI verdict does not diminish the possibility that GVA could outperform under a scenario where infrastructure spending surprises to the upside. In probabilistic terms, however, PWR's trend consistency, revenue visibility, and earnings revision strength give it the current edge.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
GVA vs. PWR commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is GVA is a StrongBuy and PWR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (GVA: $127.10 vs. PWR: $685.78)
Brand notoriety: GVA and PWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: GVA: 84% vs. PWR: 55%
Market capitalization -- GVA: $5.56B vs. PWR: $103.1B
GVA [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $5.56B. PWR’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $103.1B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $8.68B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

GVA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • GVA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PWR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the long-term than GVA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

GVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • GVA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PWR’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PWR is a better buy in the short-term than GVA.

Price Growth

GVA (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.95% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +2.07% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.08%.

Reported Earning Dates

GVA is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

PWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-2.40% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PWR($103B) has a higher market cap than GVA($5.56B). PWR has higher P/E ratio than GVA: PWR (78.46) vs GVA (32.12). PWR YTD gains are higher at: 62.583 vs. GVA (10.400). PWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.08B vs. GVA (189M). GVA has more cash in the bank: 1.05B vs. PWR (506M). GVA has less debt than PWR: GVA (1.73B) vs PWR (6.6B). PWR has higher revenues than GVA: PWR (32.9B) vs GVA (4.97B).
GVAPWRGVA / PWR
Capitalization5.56B103B5%
EBITDA189M3.08B6%
Gain YTD10.40062.58317%
P/E Ratio32.1278.4641%
Revenue4.97B32.9B15%
Total Cash1.05B506M207%
Total Debt1.73B6.6B26%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
GVA vs PWR: Fundamental Ratings
GVA
PWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7430
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2315
SMR RATING
1..100
9656
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5945
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6523
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GVA's Valuation (44) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (86). This means that GVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as GVA (23). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to GVA’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's SMR Rating (56) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GVA (96). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than GVA’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as GVA (59). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to GVA’s over the last 12 months.

PWR's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GVA (65). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than GVA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
GVAPWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
GVA
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MATX217.303.54
+1.66%
Matsons
MGRT99.020.91
+0.93%
Mega Fortune Co Ltd
GSIW17.410.09
+0.52%
Garden Stage Limited
HVII10.52N/A
N/A
Hennessy Capital Investment Corp
DHR202.45-1.44
-0.71%
Danaher Corp

GVA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVA has been loosely correlated with ROAD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GVA jumps, then ROAD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GVA
1D Price
Change %
GVA100%
+2.80%
ROAD - GVA
65%
Loosely correlated
+2.49%
FIX - GVA
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.69%
MYRG - GVA
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.17%
PWR - GVA
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
BWMN - GVA
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
More

PWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MYRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MYRG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PWR
1D Price
Change %
PWR100%
+1.93%
MYRG - PWR
79%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
FIX - PWR
78%
Closely correlated
+2.69%
MTZ - PWR
74%
Closely correlated
+4.01%
EME - PWR
69%
Closely correlated
+0.61%
ECG - PWR
69%
Closely correlated
+2.57%
More