Comparing GVA (Granite Construction Incorporated) and PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) places two infrastructure-focused companies under the same analytical lens, yet their business profiles diverge significantly. Granite Construction is a century-old heavy civil contractor and construction materials producer deeply tied to U.S. transportation and public works spending. Quanta Services is a specialty infrastructure giant serving the electric power, pipeline, energy, and communications markets — sectors currently riding powerful demand waves from electrification, grid modernization, and artificial intelligence (AI) data-center buildouts. This comparison is relevant for investors evaluating exposure to infrastructure and industrials but who need to understand the stark differences in scale, growth drivers, risk profiles, and market sentiment between these two names.
GVA, Granite Construction Incorporated, is one of the largest diversified civil contractors and construction materials companies in the United States. Founded in 1922 and headquartered in Watsonville, California, the company self-identifies as "America's Infrastructure Company." Its business spans transportation infrastructure (highways, bridges, airports), water infrastructure, and materials production — including aggregate mining, asphalt, and ready-mix concrete. Granite operates a vertically integrated model, supplying its own construction projects with internally sourced materials, which can support project-level margins.
In recent market activity, GVA shares have experienced notable volatility. After reaching an all-time high above $160 in late June 2026, the stock retreated considerably, settling near $124–$125 by late July — a pullback of approximately 18% over the past month. Year-to-date, GVA remains modestly positive with a gain of approximately 8%, though this trails broader industrial benchmarks. The stock's 52-week range spans from roughly $90 to $162, illustrating the wide swings characteristic of mid-cap construction names.
On the operational front, Granite has continued to secure new project awards. Notable recent wins include a $116.9 million contract for the West Davis Corridor expansion in Utah, a preconstruction CMAR (Construction Manager at Risk) contract for the Keystone Avenue Bridge replacement in Reno, Nevada, a $41 million roadway project in Orange County, Florida, and a $50 million dam spillway replacement project for PG&E in California. These awards underscore Granite's competitive positioning in Western and Sunbelt public infrastructure markets. However, Goldman Sachs downgraded GVA to Sell from Neutral in early July 2026, citing expectations of decelerating real public construction spending as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act winds down, along with concerns about sustaining book-to-bill momentum. Conversely, Stephens initiated coverage with an Overweight rating and a $180 price target, highlighting a more constructive infrastructure outlook. GVA's forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 19 reflects a relatively undemanding valuation compared to the broader industrial sector.
PWR, Quanta Services, Inc., is a Houston-based industry leader in specialized infrastructure solutions for the utility, power generation, communications, pipeline, and energy industries. The company provides comprehensive engineering, procurement, construction, installation, maintenance, and repair services that support the development and modernization of critical energy and communications networks. Quanta operates across the United States, Canada, Australia, and select international markets, with roughly 93% of revenue generated domestically.
Quanta Services has delivered exceptional financial momentum in recent quarters. In the first quarter of 2026, the company reported revenues of $7.87 billion — a 26.3% year-over-year increase — along with adjusted diluted earnings per share (EPS) of $2.68, which surpassed consensus estimates by a wide margin. Total backlog reached a record $48.5 billion, and remaining performance obligations (RPO) stood at $26.2 billion, providing substantial multi-year revenue visibility. The company also raised its full-year 2026 guidance: revenues are now expected between $34.7 billion and $35.2 billion, with adjusted EPS of $13.55 to $14.25.
PWR shares have surged roughly 48% year-to-date, dramatically outperforming both the S&P 500 and the broader construction sector. However, like GVA, PWR has experienced a recent pullback, declining approximately 11% over the past month from levels near $702 to roughly $626. The stock's 52-week range spans from $363 to nearly $789. The company's leadership has been active on capital allocation, authorizing a new $1 billion share repurchase program in May 2026 and paying a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. Analyst consensus leans decidedly favorable: with 17 Buy ratings and 9 Hold ratings, PWR carries a Moderate Buy consensus and an average price target in the $745–$752 range. Key growth catalysts include accelerating demand for electric transmission infrastructure, grid modernization, renewable integration, and — critically — power infrastructure for AI data centers, a market management has identified as a major multi-year growth engine.
For traders seeking to navigate the diverging trajectories of stocks like GVA and PWR, Tickeron offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots on its Trending AI Robots page. Tickeron maintains hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers across multiple market environments, but only the strongest and most market-appropriate strategies earn placement in this curated section. These bots span diverse trading styles — from short-term swing trading and momentum plays to longer-duration trend-following approaches — each with distinct timeframes, performance metrics, risk parameters, and ticker-specific focus. Some bots feature annualized returns that have outpaced broad market indexes by significant margins, while others emphasize capital preservation and lower drawdowns. A quick scan of the Trending AI Robots page reveals key statistics such as win rates, Sharpe ratios, total trades closed, and equity curves, empowering traders to evaluate which automated strategy may align with their objectives. Whether one is monitoring infrastructure names or exploring entirely different sectors, the Trending AI Robots page provides a practical starting point for discovering algorithmic trading strategies suited to current conditions.
The most striking contrast between GVA and PWR is sheer scale. Quanta Services generates annual revenues approaching $35 billion — roughly eight times Granite Construction's approximately $4.4 billion — and commands a market capitalization nearly 17 times larger. This scale difference translates into meaningfully different business dynamics: PWR benefits from a massive, diversified backlog across electric power and energy markets with secular demand tailwinds, while GVA's growth is more cyclical and dependent on public infrastructure appropriations and state-level transportation budgets.
Growth drivers also diverge sharply. PWR sits at the center of several converging megatrends — electrification, grid hardening, renewable energy integration, and the rapid expansion of power-hungry AI data centers. These forces have propelled its backlog to record levels and supported aggressive upward guidance revisions. GVA, by contrast, is more tethered to traditional transportation and water infrastructure spending, where forward visibility is clouded by the eventual expiration of federal stimulus programs and early signs of decelerating highway project commitments in its home markets.
Risk profiles differ as well. GVA faces potential demand headwinds as the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act's funding cycle matures; analysts have flagged that sustaining strong book-to-bill ratios may prove challenging. Additionally, approximately 9% of GVA's backlog is tied to Tactical Infrastructure work for U.S. Customs and Border Protection, an area where incremental project wins are not expected beyond 2026. PWR's risks center more on execution at scale — managing a $48.5 billion backlog across thousands of projects, navigating permitting and regulatory hurdles, and handling potential cost inflation on fixed-price components — alongside a premium valuation that leaves less room for disappointment. PWR's trailing P/E ratio of approximately 86 and forward P/E near 45 reflect the market's elevated growth expectations.
Market sentiment currently favors PWR. While both stocks have experienced recent weakness, PWR's institutional ownership of over 90%, consistent earnings beats, upward estimate revisions, and powerful secular narrative have sustained a broadly positive analyst consensus. GVA faces a more mixed outlook, with downgrades from influential firms offsetting more optimistic voices on the buy side.
Based on observable trend signals, earnings momentum, and relative market positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely favor PWR over GVA in the current environment. PWR's combination of record backlog, accelerating revenue growth, consistent upward earnings revisions, powerful secular demand catalysts tied to electrification and data-center buildouts, and a constructive analyst consensus creates a more compelling trend-stability profile. GVA's recent contract wins demonstrate continued operational competence, but the Goldman Sachs downgrade, concerns about the public spending cycle, and more modest growth trajectory weigh on its relative positioning. That said, GVA's significantly lower valuation — a forward P/E roughly one-third of PWR's — might appeal to value-oriented strategies, and the AI verdict does not diminish the possibility that GVA could outperform under a scenario where infrastructure spending surprises to the upside. In probabilistic terms, however, PWR's trend consistency, revenue visibility, and earnings revision strength give it the current edge.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
GVA’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePWR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
GVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PWR’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
GVA (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.95% price change this week, while PWR (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +2.07% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.08%.
GVA is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.
PWR is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| GVA | PWR | GVA / PWR | |
| Capitalization | 5.56B | 103B | 5% |
| EBITDA | 189M | 3.08B | 6% |
| Gain YTD | 10.400 | 62.583 | 17% |
| P/E Ratio | 32.12 | 78.46 | 41% |
| Revenue | 4.97B | 32.9B | 15% |
| Total Cash | 1.05B | 506M | 207% |
| Total Debt | 1.73B | 6.6B | 26% |
GVA | PWR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 30 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 86 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 15 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 23 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GVA's Valuation (44) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PWR (86). This means that GVA’s stock grew somewhat faster than PWR’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as GVA (23). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to GVA’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's SMR Rating (56) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GVA (96). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than GVA’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as GVA (59). This means that PWR’s stock grew similarly to GVA’s over the last 12 months.
PWR's P/E Growth Rating (23) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GVA (65). This means that PWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than GVA’s over the last 12 months.
| GVA | PWR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 55% | 10 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 69% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GVA has been loosely correlated with ROAD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GVA jumps, then ROAD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GVA | 100% | +2.80% | ||
| ROAD - GVA | 65% Loosely correlated | +2.49% | ||
| FIX - GVA | 50% Loosely correlated | +2.69% | ||
| MYRG - GVA | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.17% | ||
| PWR - GVA | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
| BWMN - GVA | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.24% | ||
More | ||||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PWR has been closely correlated with MYRG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PWR jumps, then MYRG could also see price increases.