Ad is loading...
FLCGX vs RGWBX
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLCGX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Retail
Price$31.83
Change+$0.11 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets33.28M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$22.04
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets18.74B
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCGX vs. RGWBX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCGX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 18.7B vs. FLCGX (33.3M). FLCGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLCGX (0.99) vs RGWBX (0.00). FLCGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLCGX (40 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). FLCGX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.43 vs. FLCGX (-13.16). FLCGX return over 5 years is better than : 36.30 vs. RGWBX (32.17).
| FLCGX | RGWBX | FLCGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.46 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.46 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.628 | -9.449 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 33.3M | 18.7B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.99 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.16 | -2.43 | 540% |
| Returns for 3 years | -11.86 | 0.36 | -3,296% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.30 | 32.17 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | -4.63 | 40.59 | -11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers