Ad is loading...
FLCGX vs RGWBX
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLCGX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Retail
Price$35.35
Change-$0.57 (-1.59%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets36.86M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$24.98
Change-$0.51 (-2.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.13B
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCGX vs. RGWBX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCGX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 21.1B vs. FLCGX (36.9M). FLCGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLCGX (1.25) vs RGWBX (0.08). FLCGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLCGX (40 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). FLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.18 vs. FLCGX (-3.92). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 29.41 vs. FLCGX (1.79).
| FLCGX | RGWBX | FLCGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.762 | 2.629 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.9M | 21.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.08 | 1,585% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.92 | 9.18 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.82 | 12.72 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.79 | 29.41 | 6% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.46 | 61.72 | 10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers