Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCGX vs RGWBX
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLCGX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Retail
Price$38.37
Change-$0.07 (-0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.53M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.48
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.6B
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCGX vs. RGWBX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCGX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 23.6B vs. FLCGX (39.5M). FLCGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLCGX (0.78) vs RGWBX (0.00). FLCGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLCGX (40 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). FLCGX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.39 vs. FLCGX (-1.85). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 36.90 vs. FLCGX (31.24).
| FLCGX | RGWBX | FLCGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.46 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.46 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.951 | 12.901 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.5M | 23.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.78 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.85 | 12.39 | -15% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.25 | 31.03 | 36% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.24 | 36.90 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.89 | 76.99 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement