Ad is loading...
FLCGX vs RGWBX
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLCGX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Retail
Price$34.92
Change+$0.18 (+0.52%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$26.08
Change+$0.19 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCGX vs. RGWBX commentary
Dec 25, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCGX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 20.6B vs. FLCGX (36.8M). FLCGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLCGX (1.25) vs RGWBX (0.08). FLCGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLCGX (40 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). FLCGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.45 vs. FLCGX (-3.87). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 32.16 vs. FLCGX (-2.60).
| FLCGX | RGWBX | FLCGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.112 | 21.190 | -19% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 36.8M | 20.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.25 | 0.08 | 1,585% |
| Returns for 1 year | -3.87 | 20.45 | -19% |
| Returns for 3 years | -17.86 | -1.87 | 955% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.60 | 32.16 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 5.93 | 70.08 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers