Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCGX vs RGWBX
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLCGX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Retail
Price$39.77
Change+$0.13 (+0.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.58M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$28.37
Change+$0.02 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets24.42B
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCGX vs. RGWBX commentary
Oct 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCGX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 24.4B vs. FLCGX (40.6M). FLCGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLCGX (0.64) vs RGWBX (0.00). FLCGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLCGX (41 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). FLCGX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.27 vs. FLCGX (-2.95). RGWBX (34.54) and FLCGX (33.60) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FLCGX | RGWBX | FLCGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.46 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.46 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 41 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.862 | 16.475 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 40.6M | 24.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.95 | 10.27 | -29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 56.77 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.60 | 34.54 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.80 | 89.80 | 30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement