Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLCGX vs RGWBX
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLCGX vs RGWBX
Meeder Sector Rotation Retail
Price$37.88
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.14M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$27.34
Change+$0.08 (+0.29%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.34B
FLCGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLCGX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLCGX is a StrongBuy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 23.3B vs. FLCGX (39.1M). FLCGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLCGX (0.79) vs RGWBX (0.00). FLCGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLCGX (40 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). FLCGX (1.77) is less costly to investors than RGWBX (1.46). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLCGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLCGX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.07 vs. FLCGX (-1.46). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 41.05 vs. FLCGX (36.91).
| FLCGX | RGWBX | FLCGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.46 | 121% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 1.46 | 121% |
| Fund Existence | 40 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.201 | 12.325 | 83% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.1M | 23.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.46 | 15.07 | -10% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.65 | 43.49 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.91 | 41.05 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.02 | 75.41 | 27% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement