FLD
Price
$0.47
Change
-$0.01 (-2.08%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
23.25M
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
TIGR
Price
$4.59
Change
-$0.02 (-0.43%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
820.24M
44 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLD vs TIGR

FLD vs TIGR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLD vs. TIGR commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLD is a StrongBuy and TIGR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (FLD: $0.47 vs. TIGR: $4.59)
Brand notoriety: FLD and TIGR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLD: 3% vs. TIGR: 11%
Market capitalization -- FLD: $23.25M vs. TIGR: $820.24M
FLD [@Investment Banks/Brokers] is valued at $23.25M. TIGR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $820.24M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $14.01B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTIGR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TIGR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FLD and TIGR are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLD’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIGR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLD’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • TIGR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLD is a better buy in the short-term than TIGR.

Price Growth

FLD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а -4.40% price change this week, while TIGR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -7.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLD is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2026.

TIGR is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-7.53% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TIGR($820M) has a higher market cap than FLD($23.2M). TIGR has higher P/E ratio than FLD: TIGR (7.46) vs FLD (1.75). TIGR YTD gains are higher at: -51.987 vs. FLD (-82.088). TIGR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 239M vs. FLD (-42.54M). TIGR has more cash in the bank: 801M vs. FLD (11.5M). FLD has less debt than TIGR: FLD (32.2M) vs TIGR (66.2M). TIGR has higher revenues than FLD: TIGR (644M) vs FLD (30.3M).
FLDTIGRFLD / TIGR
Capitalization23.2M820M3%
EBITDA-42.54M239M-18%
Gain YTD-82.088-51.987158%
P/E Ratio1.757.4623%
Revenue30.3M644M5%
Total Cash11.5M801M1%
Total Debt32.2M66.2M49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
TIGR: Fundamental Ratings
TIGR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
10
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
59
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
98
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLDTIGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
42%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLD
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
TIGR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HIOCX20.05N/A
N/A
Hartford International Opportunities C
IVIPX34.13N/A
N/A
VY® Invesco Equity and Income S2
BCEMX35.12N/A
N/A
Boston Common ESG Impact Em Mkts
JACLX19.51N/A
N/A
JHancock Mid Cap Growth C
RNWBX99.45-2.39
-2.35%
American Funds New World R-2

FLD and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FLD and DEFT have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLD and DEFT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLD
1D Price
Change %
FLD100%
-2.20%
DEFT - FLD
27%
Poorly correlated
-9.55%
FUFU - FLD
25%
Poorly correlated
-4.96%
TIGR - FLD
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
BTBT - FLD
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.96%
HOOD - FLD
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.88%
More

TIGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TIGR has been closely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TIGR jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIGR
1D Price
Change %
TIGR100%
-0.43%
FUTU - TIGR
80%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
IBKR - TIGR
45%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
XP - TIGR
37%
Loosely correlated
-3.25%
HOOD - TIGR
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.88%
GLXY - TIGR
34%
Loosely correlated
-6.15%
More