Advertisement
FLD vs TIGR
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLD is a Buy and TIGR is a Hold.
| FLD | TIGR | FLD / TIGR | |
| Capitalization | 30M | 870M | 3% |
| EBITDA | -66.61M | 249M | -27% |
| Gain YTD | -79.230 | -49.477 | 160% |
| P/E Ratio | 1.75 | 10.07 | 17% |
| Revenue | 28.2M | 688M | 4% |
| Total Cash | 28.4M | 670M | 4% |
| Total Debt | 12.4M | 61.4M | 20% |
TIGR | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 59 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FLD | TIGR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 7% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 41% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 35% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 25% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 22% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 43% | 9 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 13% | 2 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 15% | N/A |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLD’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while TIGR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FLD’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- TIGR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLD’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIGR’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLD’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- TIGR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FLD (@Investment Banks/Brokers) experienced а +0.63% price change this week, while TIGR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -4.92% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -3.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.71%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLD is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2026.
TIGR is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Banks/Brokers (-3.95% weekly)These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.
Advertisement
FLD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that FLD and BTCS have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FLD and BTCS's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLD | 100% | +4.29% | ||
| BTCS - FLD | 31% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| HOOD - FLD | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.67% | ||
| SBET - FLD | 27% Poorly correlated | +5.34% | ||
| DEFT - FLD | 27% Poorly correlated | +3.78% | ||
| TIGR - FLD | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.43% | ||
More | ||||
TIGR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TIGR has been closely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TIGR jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TIGR | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TIGR | 100% | -1.43% | ||
| FUTU - TIGR | 82% Closely correlated | -0.69% | ||
| IBKR - TIGR | 49% Loosely correlated | +2.18% | ||
| BMNR - TIGR | 44% Loosely correlated | +3.43% | ||
| SBET - TIGR | 42% Loosely correlated | +5.34% | ||
| HOOD - TIGR | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.67% | ||
More | ||||