Ad is loading...
FLDGX vs RGWBX
FLDGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLDGX vs RGWBX
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Retail
Price$14.01
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets383.88M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$25.58
Change+$0.02 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.56B
FLDGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLDGX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jan 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLDGX is a StrongBuy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 21.6B vs. FLDGX (384M). FLDGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLDGX (1.12) vs RGWBX (0.08). FLDGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLDGX (25 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). FLDGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 279.00 vs. RGWBX (1.00). RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLDGX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.34 vs. FLDGX (3.60). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 33.83 vs. FLDGX (21.28).
| FLDGX | RGWBX | FLDGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.009 | 5.094 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 384M | 21.6B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.12 | 0.08 | 1,416% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.60 | 17.34 | 21% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.96 | 13.89 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.28 | 33.83 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.40 | 71.48 | 72% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers