Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FLDGX vs RGWBX
FLDGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLDGX vs RGWBX
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Retail
Price$14.26
Change+$0.13 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets402.54M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$26.42
Change+$0.27 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.34B
FLDGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLDGX vs. RGWBX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLDGX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 22.3B vs. FLDGX (403M). FLDGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLDGX (1.08) vs RGWBX (0.00). FLDGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLDGX (25 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). RGWBX (1.46) and FLDGX (1.42) have similar cost to investors . RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLDGX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.31 vs. FLDGX (-5.00). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 45.05 vs. FLDGX (32.68).
| FLDGX | RGWBX | FLDGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.46 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.42 | 1.46 | 97% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.136 | 8.546 | 60% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 403M | 22.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.00 | 9.31 | -54% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.66 | 38.66 | 69% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.68 | 45.05 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.97 | 69.72 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement