Ad is loading...
FLDGX vs RGWBX
FLDGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLDGX vs RGWBX
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Retail
Price$13.35
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets375.57M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$23.94
Change+$0.15 (+0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets20.28B
FLDGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLDGX vs. RGWBX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLDGX is a Buy and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 20.3B vs. FLDGX (376M). FLDGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLDGX (1.14) vs RGWBX (0.00). FLDGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLDGX (25 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). RGWBX (1.46) and FLDGX (1.44) have similar cost to investors . RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLDGX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.88 vs. FLDGX (-7.56). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.50 vs. FLDGX (29.55).
| FLDGX | RGWBX | FLDGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.46 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.46 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.965 | -1.643 | 59% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 376M | 20.3B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.56 | 2.88 | -263% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.57 | 24.60 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.55 | 38.50 | 77% |
| Returns for 10 years | 39.94 | 51.75 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...