Ad is loading...
FLDGX vs RGWBX
FLDGX vs RGWBX Comparison
Open Charts FLDGX vs RGWBX
Meeder Dynamic Allocation Retail
Price$12.69
Change-$0.57 (-4.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets372.65M
American Funds Growth Portfolio R2
Price$22.24
Change-$1.14 (-4.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets19.83B
FLDGX vs RGWBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FLDGX vs. RGWBX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLDGX is a Hold and RGWBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGWBX has more cash in the bank: 19.8B vs. FLDGX (373M). FLDGX pays higher dividends than RGWBX: FLDGX (1.14) vs RGWBX (0.00). FLDGX was incepted earlier than RGWBX: FLDGX (25 years) vs RGWBX (13 years). RGWBX (1.46) and FLDGX (1.44) have similar cost to investors . RGWBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FLDGX: RGWBX (250) vs FLDGX (2500). RGWBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.68 vs. FLDGX (-8.48). RGWBX return over 5 years is better than : 60.83 vs. FLDGX (51.16).
| FLDGX | RGWBX | FLDGX / RGWBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.46 | 99% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.44 | 1.46 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 13 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.337 | -3.944 | 34% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 373M | 19.8B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.14 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.48 | -0.68 | 1,247% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.31 | 0.30 | 768% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.16 | 60.83 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.10 | 50.77 | 79% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...