FLL
Price
$2.71
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
98.28M
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLUT
Price
$97.85
Change
+$0.41 (+0.42%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
16.97B
43 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLL vs FLUT

FLL vs FLUT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLL vs. FLUT commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLL is a Hold and FLUT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (FLL: $2.71 vs. FLUT: $97.85)
Brand notoriety: FLL and FLUT are both not notable
FLL represents the Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines, while FLUT is part of the Casinos/Gaming industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLL: 68% vs. FLUT: 98%
Market capitalization -- FLL: $98.28M vs. FLUT: $16.97B
FLL [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] is valued at $98.28M. FLUT’s [@Casinos/Gaming] market capitalization is $16.97B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry ranges from $31.65B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry ranges from $35.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines] industry is $5.38B. The average market capitalization across the [@Casinos/Gaming] industry is $3.53B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFLUT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FLUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLL is a better buy in the long-term than FLUT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLUT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FLUT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLL is a better buy in the short-term than FLUT.

Price Growth

FLL (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -6.55% price change this week, while FLUT (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -10.16% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.36%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -5.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLL is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

FLUT is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-0.25% weekly)

The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.

@Casinos/Gaming (-5.31% weekly)

Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FLUT($17B) has a higher market cap than FLL($98.3M). FLL YTD gains are higher at: 3.831 vs. FLUT (-54.497). FLUT has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.05B vs. FLL (44.5M). FLUT has more cash in the bank: 3.46B vs. FLL (31.4M). FLL has less debt than FLUT: FLL (532M) vs FLUT (12.6B). FLUT has higher revenues than FLL: FLUT (17B) vs FLL (302M).
FLLFLUTFLL / FLUT
Capitalization98.3M17B1%
EBITDA44.5M2.05B2%
Gain YTD3.831-54.497-7%
P/E RatioN/A114.37-
Revenue302M17B2%
Total Cash31.4M3.46B1%
Total Debt532M12.6B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLL vs FLUT: Fundamental Ratings
FLL
FLUT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7179
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
10093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5165
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLUT's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as FLL (90) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FLL (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

FLUT's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as FLL (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.

FLL's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLUT (65) in the null industry. This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.

FLL's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLUT (100) in the null industry. This means that FLL’s stock grew significantly faster than FLUT’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLLFLUT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLUT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALZN1.350.13
+10.66%
Alzamend Neuro Inc.
GIS34.431.09
+3.27%
General Mills
AMSF32.330.93
+2.96%
AMERISAFE
BSM14.180.32
+2.31%
Black Stone Minerals LP
PBHC16.10-0.10
-0.62%
Pathfinder Bancorp

FLL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLL has been loosely correlated with INSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLL jumps, then INSE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLL
1D Price
Change %
FLL100%
N/A
INSE - FLL
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
CHDN - FLL
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
WYNN - FLL
33%
Loosely correlated
+0.51%
FLUT - FLL
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
DKNG - FLL
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
More

FLUT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLUT has been loosely correlated with DKNG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLUT jumps, then DKNG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLUT
1D Price
Change %
FLUT100%
+0.42%
DKNG - FLUT
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
BYD - FLUT
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
PENN - FLUT
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.58%
CZR - FLUT
49%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
MGM - FLUT
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.75%
More