Advertisement
FLL vs FLUT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLL is a Buy and FLUT is a Hold.
FLL's RSI Oscillator climbs out of oversold territory
The RSI Oscillator for FLL moved out of oversold territory on November 09, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is shifting from a downward trend to an upward trend. Traders may want to buy the stock or call options. The A.I.dvisor looked at 38 similar instances when the indicator left oversold territory. In 34 of the 38 cases the stock moved higher. This puts the odds of a move higher at 89%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FLL just turned positive on October 28, 2026. Looking at past instances where FLL's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 36 of 54 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Following a +6.98% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FLL advanced for three days, in 179 of 241 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 74%.
FLL may jump back above the lower band and head toward the middle band. Traders may consider buying the stock or exploring call options.
Bearish Trend Analysis
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FLL declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 84%.
The Aroon Indicator for FLL entered a downward trend on November 10, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 7 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to outstanding earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 13 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is seriously undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (-1.711) is normal, around the industry mean (14.575). P/E Ratio (-0.610) is within average values for comparable stocks, (53.870). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.130) is also within normal values, averaging (0.784). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.022) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (0.204) is also within normal values, averaging (1.049).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 85 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 94 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly worse than average price growth. FLL’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FLL’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 92, placing this stock worse than average.
FLUT's MACD Histogram just turned positive
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for FLUT turned positive on October 09, 2026. Looking at past instances where FLUT's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 28 of 39 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 72%.
Technical Analysis (Indicators)
Bullish Trend Analysis
The RSI Indicator points to a transition from a downward trend to an upward trend -- in cases where FLUT's RSI Indicator exited the oversold zone, 16 of 25 resulted in an increase in price. Tickeron's analysis proposes that the odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on October 16, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on FLUT as a result. In 62 of 92 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 67%.
Following a +0.99% 3-day Advance, the price is estimated to grow further. Considering data from situations where FLUT advanced for three days, in 204 of 300 cases, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 68%.
Bearish Trend Analysis
The Stochastic Oscillator may be shifting from an upward trend to a downward trend. In 41 of 60 cases where FLUT's Stochastic Oscillator exited the overbought zone, the price fell further within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 68%.
FLUT moved below its 50-day moving average on November 03, 2026 date and that indicates a change from an upward trend to a downward trend.
Following a 3-day decline, the stock is projected to fall further. Considering past instances where FLUT declined for three days, the price rose further in 50 of 62 cases within the following month. The odds of a continued downward trend are 74%.
FLUT broke above its upper Bollinger Band on November 02, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Aroon Indicator for FLUT entered a downward trend on October 23, 2026. This could indicate a strong downward move is ahead for the stock. Traders may want to consider selling the stock or buying put options.
Fundamental Analysis (Ratings)
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 21 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is slightly undervalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.620) is normal, around the industry mean (3.369). P/E Ratio (-19.178) is within average values for comparable stocks, (1.457). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.189) is also within normal values, averaging (0.476). Dividend Yield (0.000) settles around the average of (0.012) among similar stocks. P/S Ratio (1.001) is also within normal values, averaging (1.692).
The Tickeron Seasonality Score of 50 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is fair valued in the industry. The Tickeron Seasonality score describes the variance of predictable price changes around the same period every calendar year. These changes can be tied to a specific month, quarter, holiday or vacation period, as well as a meteorological or growing season.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 63 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating steady price growth. FLUT’s price grows at a higher rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 93 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating weak sales and an unprofitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 98 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to worse than average earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 100 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating that the returns do not compensate for the risks. FLUT’s unstable profits reported over time resulted in significant Drawdowns within these last five years. A stable profit reduces stock drawdown and volatility. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 98, placing this stock worse than average.
FLL | FLUT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 20 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 13 Undervalued | 21 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 94 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLL's Valuation (13) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLUT (21) in the null industry. This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.
FLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLUT (100) in the null industry. This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.
FLUT's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as FLL (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.
FLUT's Price Growth Rating (63) in the null industry is in the same range as FLL (94) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.
FLL's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLUT (98) in the null industry. This means that FLL’s stock grew significantly faster than FLUT’s over the last 12 months.
| FLL | FLUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 84% | 8 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 79% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while FLUT’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FLL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- FLUT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLUT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
- FLUT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FLL (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -9.70% price change this week, while FLUT (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -1.47% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.29%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -5.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was -28.42%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLL is expected to report earnings on Mar 09, 2027.
FLUT is expected to report earnings on Mar 02, 2027.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.61% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
@Casinos/Gaming (-5.30% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
Advertisement
FLL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLL has been loosely correlated with INSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLL jumps, then INSE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLL | 100% | -5.41% | ||
| INSE - FLL | 44% Loosely correlated | +16.98% | ||
| CHDN - FLL | 37% Loosely correlated | +3.23% | ||
| FLUT - FLL | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.63% | ||
| DKNG - FLL | 32% Poorly correlated | +3.53% | ||
| RSI - FLL | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.16% | ||
More | ||||
FLUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLUT has been loosely correlated with BYD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLUT jumps, then BYD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLUT | 100% | +0.63% | ||
| BYD - FLUT | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| PENN - FLUT | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.49% | ||
| CZR - FLUT | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.07% | ||
| MGM - FLUT | 46% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| RRR - FLUT | 41% Loosely correlated | -0.78% | ||
More | ||||