Advertisement
FLL vs FLUT
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLL is a Hold and FLUT is a Hold.
FLL | FLUT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 55 | 60 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 80 Overvalued | 73 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 7 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLUT's Valuation (73) in the null industry is in the same range as FLL (80) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.
FLUT's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as FLL (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.
FLUT's SMR Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as FLL (100) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.
FLUT's Price Growth Rating (89) in the null industry is in the same range as FLL (92) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry. This means that FLUT’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.
FLL's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLUT (100) in the null industry. This means that FLL’s stock grew significantly faster than FLUT’s over the last 12 months.
| FLL | FLUT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 71% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 72% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while FLUT’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- FLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FLUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLUT’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FLUT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
FLL (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -18.86% price change this week, while FLUT (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -6.62% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -2.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -10.14%, and the average quarterly price growth was -7.54%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -9.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -16.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.22%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLL is expected to report earnings on Nov 09, 2026.
FLUT is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-2.88% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
@Casinos/Gaming (-9.88% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BITS | 66.92 | 0.40 | +0.60% |
| Global X Blockchain & Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITS) | |||
| QQQE | 120.66 | 0.55 | +0.46% |
| Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index ETF (QQQE) | |||
| PBOC | 31.48 | 0.01 | +0.05% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - October (PBOC) | |||
| HMAY | 25.32 | N/A | N/A |
| Corgi U.S. Equities 100% Structured Buffer ETF (HMAY) | |||
| PABD | 67.32 | -0.59 | -0.87% |
| iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI World ex USA ETF (PABD) | |||
FLL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLL has been loosely correlated with INSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLL jumps, then INSE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLL | 100% | N/A | ||
| INSE - FLL | 44% Loosely correlated | +6.69% | ||
| CHDN - FLL | 37% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| FLUT - FLL | 33% Poorly correlated | +2.59% | ||
| DKNG - FLL | 32% Poorly correlated | +1.84% | ||
| RSI - FLL | 27% Poorly correlated | -1.87% | ||
More | ||||
FLUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLUT has been loosely correlated with BYD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLUT jumps, then BYD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLUT | 100% | +2.59% | ||
| BYD - FLUT | 51% Loosely correlated | -0.75% | ||
| PENN - FLUT | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.89% | ||
| CZR - FLUT | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.10% | ||
| MGM - FLUT | 46% Loosely correlated | -1.87% | ||
| RRR - FLUT | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.23% | ||
More | ||||