Q | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 76 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 31 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FLLA | Q | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 50% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 83% | 9 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 88% | 2 days ago 90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLLA has been loosely correlated with CCU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLLA jumps, then CCU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLLA | 100% | -1.14% | ||
| CCU - FLLA | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| LTM - FLLA | 55% Loosely correlated | -4.31% | ||
| Q - FLLA | 37% Loosely correlated | +2.16% | ||
| ECL - FLLA | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.21% | ||
| OMAB - FLLA | -9% Poorly correlated | -2.52% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, Q has been loosely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if Q jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.