FLO
Price
$20.92
Change
+$0.12 (+0.58%)
Updated
Dec 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
50 days until earnings call
MDLZ
Price
$60.71
Change
-$0.63 (-1.03%)
Updated
Dec 18, 10:33 AM (EDT)
42 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLO vs MDLZ

Header iconFLO vs MDLZ Comparison
Open Charts FLO vs MDLZBanner chart's image
Flowers Foods
Price$20.92
Change+$0.12 (+0.58%)
Volume$16.96K
CapitalizationN/A
Mondelez International
Price$60.71
Change-$0.63 (-1.03%)
Volume$8.45K
CapitalizationN/A
FLO vs MDLZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. MDLZ commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a Hold and MDLZ is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (FLO: $20.92 vs. MDLZ: $61.34)
Brand notoriety: FLO: Not notable vs. MDLZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 105% vs. MDLZ: 138%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $5B vs. MDLZ: $94.25B
FLO [@Food: Specialty/Candy] is valued at $5B. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $94.25B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $327.81B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $9.09B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the long-term than FLO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FLO and MDLZ are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -4.30% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -0.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -0.93%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Feb 06, 2025.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-0.93% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDLZ($94.3B) has a higher market cap than FLO($5B). FLO has higher P/E ratio than MDLZ: FLO (40.74) vs MDLZ (19.27). FLO YTD gains are higher at: -3.136 vs. MDLZ (-13.701). MDLZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 7.65B vs. FLO (345M). MDLZ has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. FLO (22.5M). FLO has less debt than MDLZ: FLO (1.35B) vs MDLZ (19.9B). MDLZ has higher revenues than FLO: MDLZ (36B) vs FLO (5.09B).
FLOMDLZFLO / MDLZ
Capitalization5B94.3B5%
EBITDA345M7.65B5%
Gain YTD-3.136-13.70123%
P/E Ratio40.7419.27211%
Revenue5.09B36B14%
Total Cash22.5M1.81B1%
Total Debt1.35B19.9B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
MDLZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6254
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6435
SMR RATING
1..100
5159
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7362
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9446
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (15) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MDLZ (38) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FLO (64) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's SMR Rating (51) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MDLZ (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as FLO (73) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (46) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLO (94) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry. This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOMDLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MDLZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BEDZ34.150.14
+0.42%
AdvisorShares Hotel ETF
VNLA49.040.01
+0.02%
Janus Henderson Short Duration Inc ETF
UCRD21.25N/A
N/A
VictoryShares Corporate Bond ETF
XRLV54.10N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P 500® ex-Rate Snsv LowVol ETF
CFO70.71-0.57
-0.79%
VictoryShares US 500 Enh Vol Wtd ETF

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
+0.58%
GIS - FLO
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
CPB - FLO
56%
Loosely correlated
+1.15%
CAG - FLO
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
MDLZ - FLO
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
SJM - FLO
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with HSY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then HSY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
-0.24%
HSY - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
GIS - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
KHC - MDLZ
57%
Loosely correlated
+0.90%
FLO - MDLZ
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.58%
CAG - MDLZ
55%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
More