Advertisement
CPB vs MDLZ
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Campbell's (CPB) vs. Mondelez (MDLZ) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CPB and MDLZ operate in the consumer staples sector, with CPB focused on soups and snacks and MDLZ on global snacks and confectionery.
- CPB has experienced notable price pressure in recent market activity, with shares trading near the lower end of their 52-week range amid sales declines.
- MDLZ has shown relatively stronger year-to-date performance compared to broader market benchmarks in some periods, though it has faced recent volatility.
- Recent earnings for CPB highlighted organic sales declines, while MDLZ reported earnings beats in prior quarters.
- Risk factors for both include commodity costs and shifting consumer preferences, with MDLZ benefiting from broader international exposure.
- Market sentiment reflects defensive characteristics for the sector, yet relative momentum favors stability in one over the other based on observable trends.
Introduction
Campbell's (CPB) and Mondelez (MDLZ) represent two established players in the consumer staples space, offering investors exposure to everyday food and snack products. This comparison examines their business models, recent stock behavior, and positioning within a market environment marked by inflation sensitivity and shifting consumer demand. Traders and investors focused on relative performance, sector resilience, and AI-driven trend analysis may find this overview useful for evaluating portfolio allocation between these defensive names.
CPB Overview and Recent Performance
The Campbell's Company produces soups, snacks, and related products primarily for the North American market. In recent market activity, CPB shares have traded under pressure, closing near $21.47 amid broader sector challenges. Recent quarterly results showed net sales declines on both reported and organic bases, with adjusted earnings metrics also lower year-over-year. These developments have contributed to a subdued sentiment, with the stock positioned toward the lower end of its 52-week range and reflecting ongoing margin and volume considerations in a competitive environment.
MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance
Mondelez International focuses on global snacks, chocolate, and confectionery brands with significant international operations. In recent market activity, MDLZ shares have fluctuated around the $58–$60 range, demonstrating periods of relative resilience compared to some peers. Prior earnings reports included beats on earnings per share estimates, supporting steadier sentiment despite broader market volatility. The company’s performance has reflected a mix of volume trends and pricing dynamics, with shares maintaining positioning within a wide 52-week range amid ongoing consumer staples sector rotation.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page highlights select AI trading bots from a large library that trade thousands of different tickers. Only the strongest performers suited to prevailing market conditions appear in this curated section. Available bots span a wide range of trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and performance statistics, with many showing varied win rates and risk metrics depending on their specific parameters. This diversity allows users to explore options aligned with individual preferences. For more details on these tools, visit Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
CPB and MDLZ share consumer staples exposure yet differ in geographic reach and product focus. CPB maintains a more concentrated North American presence centered on soups and select snacks, while MDLZ benefits from diversified global operations across emerging and developed markets. Recent momentum has shown MDLZ with comparatively steadier year-to-date results in certain windows, whereas CPB has faced greater price compression tied to domestic sales softness. Risk factors include input cost inflation for both, though MDLZ’s international diversification may offer partial offsets. Sector sentiment remains cautious overall, with trade-offs centered on growth stability versus valuation sensitivity.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors such as relative price stability, earnings consistency, and sector positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward MDLZ for its demonstrated resilience in trend metrics compared to CPB. This assessment draws from available performance differentials rather than forward projections and remains subject to ongoing market shifts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPB is a Hold and MDLZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CPB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- CPB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CPB’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CPB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MDLZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CPB (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -5.36% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -3.41% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -5.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.47%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.26%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -3.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -18.41%.
Reported Earning Dates
CPB is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.
MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-5.19% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-3.00% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| CPB | MDLZ | CPB / MDLZ | |
| Capitalization | 6.58B | 75.5B | 9% |
| EBITDA | 1.54B | 5.23B | 29% |
| Gain YTD | -16.763 | 11.149 | -150% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.82 | 29.12 | 37% |
| Revenue | 9.93B | 39.3B | 25% |
| Total Cash | 209M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 7.01B | 21.6B | 32% |
CPB | MDLZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 31 | 53 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | 22 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 89 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 71 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 60 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 33 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CPB's Valuation (4) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as MDLZ (22). This means that CPB’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (89) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CPB (100). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to CPB’s over the last 12 months.
CPB's SMR Rating (56) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as MDLZ (71). This means that CPB’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CPB (60). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to CPB’s over the last 12 months.
MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPB (92). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPB’s over the last 12 months.
| CPB | MDLZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 45% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 47% | 10 days ago 54% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 50% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 51% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 43% | N/A |
Advertisement
CPB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPB has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPB jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.