CPB
Price
$21.41
Change
-$0.47 (-2.15%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
6.38B
34 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MDLZ
Price
$60.05
Change
-$0.81 (-1.33%)
Updated
Jul 23 closing price
Capitalization
77.08B
4 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

CPB vs MDLZ

CPB vs MDLZ Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 19, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? The Campbell's Company (CPB) vs. Mondelez International (MDLZ) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • CPB faces significant headwinds including snack category softness, tariff-driven cost inflation, and declining volumes, with its stock down substantially over the past twelve months and consensus analyst ratings leaning toward "Reduce."
  • MDLZ has demonstrated stronger top-line momentum through pricing power and global diversification, though unprecedented cocoa costs have compressed margins and pressured adjusted EPS (earnings per share).
  • Both companies operate in the packaged-food sector under similar macro pressures, but MDLZ benefits from a broader international footprint and a portfolio weighted toward indulgent snacking categories with stronger pricing elasticity.
  • CPB offers a compelling dividend yield above 5%, which may appeal to income-oriented investors, while MDLZ has prioritized aggressive share buybacks alongside its dividend.
  • Recent market activity suggests MDLZ is further along in stabilizing profitability after a difficult cycle, while CPB continues to navigate a more uncertain near-term earnings path.

Introduction

In the consumer staples universe, few names carry the brand recognition of CPB and MDLZ. The Campbell's Company and Mondelez International both command iconic portfolios — from Campbell's soups and Goldfish crackers to Oreo cookies and Cadbury chocolate — yet their recent trajectories have diverged in meaningful ways. This comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to defensive, dividend-paying equities at a time when the packaged-food industry faces a confluence of challenges: persistent input cost inflation, shifting consumer preferences, tariff uncertainty, and the growing appeal of private-label alternatives. By examining how these two storied companies are navigating the current environment, traders and long-term investors alike can gain a clearer picture of relative positioning within the sector.

CPB Overview and Recent Performance

The Campbell's Company (CPB), headquartered in Camden, New Jersey, has undergone a significant transformation in recent years — most visibly marked by its rebranding from Campbell Soup Company to reflect a broader portfolio that now includes the fast-growing Rao's brand, acquired through the Sovos Brands transaction. In its fiscal 2025 (which ended in August 2025), Campbell's reported net sales of $10.3 billion, a 6% increase driven largely by the acquisition, though organic net sales declined 1%. Adjusted EPS came in at $2.97, down 4% year over year, reflecting higher interest expenses tied to acquisition-related debt.

The company's more recent performance, however, has raised concerns among market participants. In the calendar fourth quarter of 2025, Campbell's posted revenue of $2.56 billion — a 4.5% year-over-year decline that missed Wall Street estimates — while adjusted EPS of $0.51 fell short of the consensus $0.57. The company also lowered its full-year EPS guidance, citing softness in its Snacks division and the impact of tariffs on input costs. In recent weeks, the stock has traded near multi-year lows, and the consensus analyst rating sits at "Reduce." On a positive note, Campbell's Meals & Beverages segment has shown resilience as consumers continue favoring at-home meal preparation, and the company is executing a substantial cost-savings program aimed at delivering approximately $250 million in efficiencies.

MDLZ Overview and Recent Performance

Mondelez International (MDLZ), based in Chicago, is one of the world's largest snacking companies, with a portfolio spanning chocolate, biscuits, gum, and candy brands sold in over 150 countries. For full-year 2025, Mondelez reported net revenues of $38.5 billion, representing 5.8% reported growth and 4.3% organic growth, driven overwhelmingly by pricing actions. However, the year was defined by historically high cocoa costs, which caused adjusted EPS to contract 14.6% on a constant-currency basis to $2.92. The company's volume/mix declined 3.7% for the year, reflecting the consumer response to elevated prices.

In its most recent quarterly report — the fourth quarter of fiscal 2025 — Mondelez delivered organic revenue growth of 5.1% and adjusted EPS of $0.72, which beat consensus estimates and rose 4.6% on a constant-currency basis. This marked a notable inflection after several quarters of steep earnings declines, suggesting that the worst of the cocoa cost cycle may be receding. The company generated $3.2 billion in free cash flow during the year and returned $4.9 billion to shareholders through dividends and buybacks. Looking ahead to fiscal 2026, management guided for organic revenue growth of flat to 2% and adjusted EPS growth of flat to 5%, signaling cautious optimism. Emerging markets — where Mondelez derives a substantial portion of revenue — continue to outperform developed markets, providing a structural growth tailwind.

Trending AI Robots

In a market environment where every basis point of edge matters, traders are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence for data-driven decision-making. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots — handpicked from hundreds of available strategies based on their real-time suitability for current market conditions. These bots span diverse trading styles, timeframes ranging from 5-minute to daily intervals, and a wide array of underlying tickers. Some of the standout bots have posted annualized returns ranging from approximately 63% to over 290% in recent evaluations, with Sharpe ratios and drawdown metrics that underscore the sophistication of Tickeron's Financial Learning Models (FLMs). Each bot operates with its own strategy, risk profile, and ticker focus, giving traders the flexibility to align automated trading with their individual objectives. For those seeking an analytical edge in today's volatile markets, exploring the Trending AI Robots section is a logical next step.

Head-to-Head Comparison

When comparing CPB and MDLZ, several contrasts emerge. Business model and geographic reach: Campbell's is heavily concentrated in North America, with limited international exposure, while Mondelez generates substantial revenue across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America — giving it a more diversified revenue base and exposure to faster-growing emerging markets. Growth drivers: Campbell's is leaning on the Rao's brand and at-home meal trends in its Meals & Beverages division to offset persistent Snacks weakness. Mondelez, meanwhile, benefits from the global strength of its chocolate and biscuit franchises and has demonstrated superior pricing power, though it faces its own volume headwinds as consumers push back on higher price points.

Margin pressures and cost management: Both companies are grappling with input cost inflation, but the nature of the pressure differs. Mondelez has been navigating unprecedented cocoa prices — a challenge that appears to be easing — while Campbell's is contending with tariff-related costs on packaging materials and agricultural commodities. Capital allocation: Campbell's offers a dividend yield above 5%, supported by a high payout ratio near 78%, which may raise sustainability questions if earnings continue to decline. Mondelez returned $4.9 billion to shareholders in fiscal 2025 through a combination of dividends (recently raised 6%) and aggressive share repurchases. Market sentiment: Analyst consensus leans negative on CPB (consensus "Reduce") and is cautious but more neutral on MDLZ, reflecting the view that Mondelez is further along in its earnings stabilization journey.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trends and relative positioning, Tickeron's AI-driven analysis would likely lean in favor of MDLZ over CPB in the current market environment. Mondelez's broader geographic diversification, stronger organic revenue growth profile, recent earnings stabilization, and massive free cash flow generation suggest a more resilient fundamental backdrop. While Campbell's offers a higher dividend yield and trades at what may appear to be a deeply discounted valuation, the combination of declining volumes, downward earnings revisions, and a more domestically concentrated risk profile introduces greater uncertainty. That said, if Campbell's cost-savings initiatives gain traction and its Snacks division stabilizes faster than expected, the risk-reward equation could shift. The AI verdict therefore reflects a probabilistic assessment — identifying MDLZ as the stock with a relatively stronger alignment of trend consistency, catalyst visibility, and risk-adjusted positioning at this juncture.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
CPB vs. MDLZ commentary
Jul 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CPB is a Hold and MDLZ is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 24, 2026
Stock price -- (CPB: $21.41 vs. MDLZ: $60.05)
Brand notoriety: CPB and MDLZ are both notable
CPB represents the Food: Major Diversified, while MDLZ is part of the Food: Specialty/Candy industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CPB: 42% vs. MDLZ: 65%
Market capitalization -- CPB: $6.38B vs. MDLZ: $77.08B
CPB [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $6.38B. MDLZ’s [@Food: Specialty/Candy] market capitalization is $77.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $255.67B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry ranges from $77.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $3.13B. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Specialty/Candy] industry is $23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CPB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMDLZ’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CPB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MDLZ’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the long-term than CPB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CPB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MDLZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CPB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MDLZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MDLZ is a better buy in the short-term than CPB.

Price Growth

CPB (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -5.47% price change this week, while MDLZ (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -2.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -6.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.83%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -4.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was -25.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

CPB is expected to report earnings on Aug 27, 2026.

MDLZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.89% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

@Food: Specialty/Candy (-4.04% weekly)

A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDLZ($77.1B) has a higher market cap than CPB($6.39B). MDLZ has higher P/E ratio than CPB: MDLZ (29.73) vs CPB (10.50). MDLZ YTD gains are higher at: 13.454 vs. CPB (-19.252). MDLZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.23B vs. CPB (1.54B). CPB has less debt than MDLZ: CPB (7.01B) vs MDLZ (21.6B). MDLZ has higher revenues than CPB: MDLZ (39.3B) vs CPB (9.93B).
CPBMDLZCPB / MDLZ
Capitalization6.39B77.1B8%
EBITDA1.54B5.23B29%
Gain YTD-19.25213.454-143%
P/E Ratio10.5029.7335%
Revenue9.93B39.3B25%
Total Cash402MN/A-
Total Debt7.01B21.6B32%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CPB vs MDLZ: Fundamental Ratings
CPB
MDLZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8358
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10082
SMR RATING
1..100
5671
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9333
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CPB's Valuation (4) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as MDLZ (23). This means that CPB’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (82) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CPB (100). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to CPB’s over the last 12 months.

CPB's SMR Rating (56) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as MDLZ (71). This means that CPB’s stock grew similarly to MDLZ’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CPB (56). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew similarly to CPB’s over the last 12 months.

MDLZ's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CPB (93). This means that MDLZ’s stock grew somewhat faster than CPB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CPBMDLZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CPB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MDLZ
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GRNQ1.270.06
+4.96%
Greenpro Capital Corp
CHDN83.751.61
+1.96%
Churchill Downs
ADP242.88-0.24
-0.10%
Automatic Data Processing
NPKI14.49-0.33
-2.23%
NPK International Inc
FUFU1.31-0.14
-9.66%
BitFuFu

CPB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CPB has been loosely correlated with KHC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CPB jumps, then KHC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CPB
1D Price
Change %
CPB100%
-2.15%
KHC - CPB
64%
Loosely correlated
-2.31%
MDLZ - CPB
59%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
SJM - CPB
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.98%
HSY - CPB
53%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
FLO - CPB
53%
Loosely correlated
-6.17%
More

MDLZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MDLZ has been loosely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MDLZ jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MDLZ
1D Price
Change %
MDLZ100%
-1.33%
GIS - MDLZ
65%
Loosely correlated
-3.68%
CAG - MDLZ
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.10%
CPB - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.15%
KHC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-2.31%
MKC - MDLZ
58%
Loosely correlated
-3.52%
More