FLO
Price
$7.74
Change
-$0.01 (-0.13%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
1.64B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MKC
Price
$49.96
Change
-$0.23 (-0.46%)
Updated
Jul 24 closing price
Capitalization
13.44B
73 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLO vs MKC

FLO vs MKC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLO vs. MKC commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLO is a StrongBuy and MKC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (FLO: $7.74 vs. MKC: $49.96)
Brand notoriety: FLO and MKC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLO: 49% vs. MKC: 74%
Market capitalization -- FLO: $1.64B vs. MKC: $13.44B
FLO [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $1.64B. MKC’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $13.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $255.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $3.15B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLO’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMKC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLO’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MKC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FLO and MKC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MKC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MKC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MKC is a better buy in the short-term than FLO.

Price Growth

FLO (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -8.83% price change this week, while MKC (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -3.37% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -0.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLO is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

MKC is expected to report earnings on Oct 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-0.36% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MKC($13.4B) has a higher market cap than FLO($1.64B). FLO has higher P/E ratio than MKC: FLO (22.11) vs MKC (8.31). MKC (-25.324) and FLO (-25.710) have similar YTD gains . MKC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.39B vs. FLO (356M). FLO has less debt than MKC: FLO (2.05B) vs MKC (4.93B). MKC has higher revenues than FLO: MKC (7.39B) vs FLO (5.27B).
FLOMKCFLO / MKC
Capitalization1.64B13.4B12%
EBITDA356M1.39B26%
Gain YTD-25.710-25.324102%
P/E Ratio22.118.31266%
Revenue5.27B7.39B71%
Total CashN/A331M-
Total Debt2.05B4.93B42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLO vs MKC: Fundamental Ratings
FLO
MKC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7082
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
14
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8537
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6358
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2098
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLO's Valuation (2) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MKC (14). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to MKC’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as MKC (100). This means that FLO’s stock grew similarly to MKC’s over the last 12 months.

MKC's SMR Rating (37) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLO (85). This means that MKC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLO’s over the last 12 months.

MKC's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is in the same range as FLO (63). This means that MKC’s stock grew similarly to FLO’s over the last 12 months.

FLO's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Food Specialty Or Candy industry is significantly better than the same rating for MKC (98). This means that FLO’s stock grew significantly faster than MKC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLOMKC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MKC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
COPY15.350.15
+0.96%
Tweedy, Browne Insider + Value ETF
EDIV41.540.15
+0.36%
State Street® SPDR® S&P Em Mkts Div ETF
APRP32.52N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 12 ETF - Apr
SPDN8.80N/A
N/A
Direxion Daily S&P 500® Bear 1X ETF
RBLY11.75-0.04
-0.34%
Yieldmax Rblx Option Income Strategy ETF

FLO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLO has been loosely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLO jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLO
1D Price
Change %
FLO100%
-0.13%
CAG - FLO
55%
Loosely correlated
+2.78%
GIS - FLO
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
MDLZ - FLO
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
CPB - FLO
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.01%
MKC - FLO
44%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
More

MKC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MKC has been loosely correlated with MDLZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MKC jumps, then MDLZ could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MKC
1D Price
Change %
MKC100%
-0.46%
MDLZ - MKC
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
CAG - MKC
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.78%
GIS - MKC
53%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
POST - MKC
52%
Loosely correlated
+0.83%
KHC - MKC
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.22%
More