Advertisement
FLR vs MTZ
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Fluor Corporation (FLR) vs. MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FLR has delivered a year-to-date return of approximately 34%, significantly outperforming the S&P 500's 6%, driven by steady gains in engineering and construction services.
- MTZ shows explosive growth with over 100% YTD and 200% one-year returns, fueled by record Q1 results and a robust backlog in infrastructure projects.
- Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector (Engineering & Construction industry), but MTZ's larger market cap of $34.6B dwarfs FLR's $7.6B, reflecting broader exposure to communications and clean energy.
- Recent momentum favors MTZ post its Q1 earnings beat and raised guidance, while FLR approaches its upcoming earnings with consistent multi-year gains.
- MTZ exhibits higher volatility (beta 1.82) compared to FLR (beta 1.33), offering trade-offs in risk and reward for investors.
- Tickeron's AI tools highlight strong relative performance in infrastructure-related bots, aiding stock comparison analysis.
Introduction
In the Industrials sector, particularly Engineering & Construction, FLR and MTZ represent key players benefiting from infrastructure demand, energy transitions, and government spending. This stock comparison evaluates their recent market positioning, performance metrics, and growth drivers amid rising interest in clean energy and EPC (engineering, procurement, and construction) services. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing sector stability will find insights into relative performance, risk profiles, and sentiment shifts valuable for portfolio decisions in the current environment.
FLR Overview and Recent Performance
Fluor Corporation (FLR) is a global provider of EPC services, operating through Energy Solutions, Urban Solutions, and Mission Solutions segments. It serves oil & gas, infrastructure, mining, and government clients worldwide. In recent market activity, FLR has traded around $53, with a 52-week range of $34 to $57. The stock's YTD gain of 34% and one-year return of 54% outpace the S&P 500, supported by a market cap of $7.6B and beta of 1.33 indicating moderate volatility. Sentiment has been bolstered by consistent multi-year growth—94% over three years—and upcoming Q1 2026 earnings on May 8, amid steady revenue of $15.5B (TTM). Broader infrastructure tailwinds and project backlogs have influenced positive price behavior, though recent net income challenges temper enthusiasm.
MTZ Overview and Recent Performance
MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) specializes in infrastructure construction across Communications, Clean Energy and Infrastructure, Power Delivery, and Pipeline segments, focusing on North America. It builds wireless, fiber, renewable energy, and utility projects. Recently, MTZ has surged to around $438, with a 52-week range of $144 to $438 and market cap of $34.6B. Explosive YTD performance of 101% and one-year gain of 205% reflect record Q1 2026 results: revenue up 34% to $3.83B, EPS of $1.39 beating estimates, and raised full-year guidance. A beta of 1.82 signals higher volatility, driven by strong backlog growth and partnerships in solar and data centers. These catalysts have shifted sentiment positively in recent weeks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases over 25 top-performing AI trading bots, curated from a total of 351 bots that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots are selected by AI for their suitability to current market conditions, featuring diverse strategies, timeframes, and performance stats like annualized returns up to +169%, win rates of 51-88%, and profit factors reaching 11.7. Coverage spans sectors including semiconductors, industrials (e.g., construction-related like PWR), space, and data centers. Traders can explore signal agents for real-time alerts or virtual agents with risk controls. Visit Trending AI Robots to discover bots aligned with today's trends.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both FLR and MTZ thrive in EPC and infrastructure, but diverge in focus: FLR emphasizes global energy and government projects, while MTZ targets North American communications, clean energy, and utilities. Growth drivers highlight MTZ's superior momentum from Q1 beats and backlog expansion versus FLR's steadier project wins. Recent relative performance favors MTZ's triple-digit YTD surge over FLR's solid 34%, though FLR offers lower risk (beta 1.33 vs. 1.82). Sector exposure overlaps in industrials, but MTZ benefits more from renewables and data centers. Market sentiment leans toward MTZ amid raised guidance, while FLR faces earnings scrutiny; trade-offs balance FLR's stability against MTZ's upside potential.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors MTZ due to its superior trend consistency, recent catalysts like record Q1 results and backlog growth, and stronger relative positioning in high-demand infrastructure areas. While FLR maintains stability and upcoming earnings potential, MTZ's momentum suggests higher probability of near-term outperformance, observable in YTD gains and analyst upgrades.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLR is a StrongBuy and MTZ is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FLR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +1.92% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +2.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +3.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.02%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLR is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+3.30% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| FLR | MTZ | FLR / MTZ | |
| Capitalization | 7.05B | 29.4B | 24% |
| EBITDA | -206M | 1.22B | -17% |
| Gain YTD | 27.353 | 71.068 | 38% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.05 | 65.12 | 35% |
| Revenue | 15.2B | 15.3B | 99% |
| Total Cash | 3.67B | 274M | 1,340% |
| Total Debt | 1.07B | 3.02B | 35% |
FLR | MTZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 28 | 55 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 17 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 60 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 39 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 3 | 46 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLR's Valuation (70) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (85). This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (45). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's SMR Rating (60) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (69). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (45). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
FLR's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (46). This means that FLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| FLR | MTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 88% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 66% | 7 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 61% |
Advertisement
FLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLR has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
MTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | +2.45% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 81% Closely correlated | +2.35% | ||
| FIX - MTZ | 75% Closely correlated | +3.96% | ||
| MYRG - MTZ | 73% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| IESC - MTZ | 66% Loosely correlated | -3.12% | ||
| ECG - MTZ | 65% Loosely correlated | +4.78% | ||
More | ||||