FLR
Price
$33.97
Change
-$3.25 (-8.73%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.71B
28 days until earnings call
MTZ
Price
$111.94
Change
-$10.82 (-8.81%)
Updated
Apr 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
8.88B
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FLR vs MTZ

Header iconFLR vs MTZ Comparison
Open Charts FLR vs MTZBanner chart's image
Fluor
Price$33.97
Change-$3.25 (-8.73%)
Volume$44K
Capitalization5.71B
MasTec
Price$111.94
Change-$10.82 (-8.81%)
Volume$12.66K
Capitalization8.88B
FLR vs MTZ Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLR vs. MTZ commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLR is a Hold and MTZ is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FLR: $37.22 vs. MTZ: $122.76)
Brand notoriety: FLR: Not notable vs. MTZ: Notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLR: 73% vs. MTZ: 59%
Market capitalization -- FLR: $5.71B vs. MTZ: $8.88B
FLR [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $5.71B. MTZ’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $8.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $5.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FLR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLR is a better buy in the long-term than MTZ.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MTZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MTZ is a better buy in the short-term than FLR.

Price Growth

FLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -1.38% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +0.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLR is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

MTZ is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-2.76% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MTZ($8.88B) has a higher market cap than FLR($5.71B). MTZ has higher P/E ratio than FLR: MTZ (54.37) vs FLR (2.76). MTZ YTD gains are higher at: -17.732 vs. FLR (-24.534). MTZ has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 951M vs. FLR (732M). FLR has more cash in the bank: 2.96B vs. MTZ (400M). FLR has less debt than MTZ: FLR (1.1B) vs MTZ (2.63B). FLR has higher revenues than MTZ: FLR (16.3B) vs MTZ (12.3B).
FLRMTZFLR / MTZ
Capitalization5.71B8.88B64%
EBITDA732M951M77%
Gain YTD-24.534-17.732138%
P/E Ratio2.7654.375%
Revenue16.3B12.3B133%
Total Cash2.96B400M740%
Total Debt1.1B2.63B42%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLR vs MTZ: Fundamental Ratings
FLR
MTZ
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
585
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3133
SMR RATING
1..100
1682
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8059
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FLR's Valuation (34) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (92). This means that FLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

FLR's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (33). This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

FLR's SMR Rating (16) in the Engineering And Construction industry is significantly better than the same rating for MTZ (82). This means that FLR’s stock grew significantly faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.

MTZ's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (80). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.

MTZ's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (100). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLRMTZ
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
75%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FLR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MTZ
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DVY134.860.68
+0.51%
iShares Select Dividend ETF
ROAM23.650.06
+0.27%
Hartford Multifactor Emerging Mkts ETF
IBDX24.980.07
+0.26%
iShares iBonds Dec 2032 Term Corp ETF
JGH12.64-0.37
-2.81%
NUVEEN GLOBAL HIGH Income FUND
BKSE88.29-6.33
-6.69%
BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF

FLR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLR has been loosely correlated with PRIM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLR jumps, then PRIM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLR
1D Price
Change %
FLR100%
+2.39%
PRIM - FLR
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.21%
FIX - FLR
59%
Loosely correlated
+3.72%
EME - FLR
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.52%
PWR - FLR
57%
Loosely correlated
+2.59%
MTZ - FLR
55%
Loosely correlated
+3.42%
More

MTZ and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with EME. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then EME could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MTZ
1D Price
Change %
MTZ100%
-8.77%
EME - MTZ
80%
Closely correlated
-7.90%
PWR - MTZ
80%
Closely correlated
-4.71%
FIX - MTZ
78%
Closely correlated
-9.03%
PRIM - MTZ
78%
Closely correlated
-7.03%
IESC - MTZ
72%
Closely correlated
-10.15%
More