Infrastructure and construction engineering stocks have drawn considerable attention in recent years as global spending on energy transition, grid modernization, data centers, and industrial projects accelerates. Within this broad sector, Fluor Corporation (FLR) and MasTec, Inc. (MTZ) represent two distinct approaches to capturing infrastructure-related growth. Fluor brings a century-long legacy in large-scale EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction) projects worldwide, while MasTec has carved out a dominant position in North American communications, energy, and utility infrastructure. For traders and investors weighing exposure to this secular theme, understanding how these two names diverge in terms of momentum, risk, and market positioning offers a practical lens for decision-making.
Fluor Corporation (FLR), headquartered in Irving, Texas, is one of the largest EPC firms globally, with operations spanning urban infrastructure, energy solutions, and mission-critical government projects. The company serves clients across mining, life sciences, advanced technologies, and energy markets with approximately 23,000 employees worldwide.
In recent months, Fluor's stock has shown resilience after a turbulent stretch. The company's full-year 2025 results reflected the weight of a $643 million adverse judgment tied to the long-completed Santos project in Australia, which significantly impacted both reported revenue and GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) earnings. For the full year, Fluor posted revenue of $15.5 billion but recorded a GAAP net loss attributable to Fluor of $51 million. On an adjusted basis, the company generated adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization) of $504 million and adjusted EPS (Earnings Per Share) of $2.19.
On a more encouraging note, Fluor ended 2025 with a backlog of $25.5 billion, 81% of which is reimbursable — meaning the company gets paid for its actual costs rather than absorbing cost overruns on fixed-price contracts. The monetization of its stake in NuScale Power has progressed meaningfully, with $605 million in proceeds received in 2025 and an additional $1.35 billion in early 2026. Management has also signaled an aggressive capital return posture, repurchasing $754 million in shares during 2025 and targeting $1.4 billion in buybacks for 2026. These factors have helped stabilize sentiment, though cost overruns on certain infrastructure projects and a pending securities class action lawsuit have kept some investors cautious.
MasTec, Inc. (MTZ), based in Coral Gables, Florida, is a leading North American infrastructure engineering and construction company operating across four primary segments: Communications (wireless and wireline/fiber), Clean Energy and Infrastructure (renewables and heavy civil), Power Delivery (transmission and distribution), and Pipeline Infrastructure. The company has emerged as a key beneficiary of several secular tailwinds, including 5G network expansion, renewable energy construction, grid modernization, and natural gas pipeline infrastructure investment.
MasTec's recent performance has been notably strong. Full-year 2025 results set multiple records: revenue rose 16% year-over-year to $14.3 billion, GAAP net income more than doubled to $422 million, and adjusted EBITDA reached $1.15 billion. The company's 18-month backlog surged 33% to a record $19.0 billion, reflecting broad-based demand across all four operating segments. Fourth-quarter 2025 momentum was particularly impressive, with pipeline infrastructure revenue jumping nearly 50% year-over-year and communications revenue climbing 23%.
Looking ahead, MasTec's initial 2026 guidance calls for revenue of approximately $17 billion and adjusted EBITDA of roughly $1.45 billion, representing 19% and 26% growth respectively. The company continues to benefit from an exceptionally strong demand climate across energy, communications, and power markets. While operating cash flow has been somewhat uneven — reflecting working capital needs associated with rapid growth — the overall earnings trajectory and backlog expansion have driven robust share price appreciation and elevated investor confidence.
For traders seeking a data-driven edge in evaluating stocks like FLR and MTZ, Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page offers a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots. Tickeron hosts hundreds of AI trading bots that collectively trade thousands of different tickers, but only the strongest performers — those best suited to prevailing market conditions — earn placement in this featured section. These bots span a wide range of trading styles, from short-term swing traders and trend followers to multi-agent systems that hedge across correlated instruments. Some bots have posted annualized returns exceeding 75%, while select high-frequency models have achieved annualized returns above 100% in recent market environments, with win rates reaching as high as 67%. Each bot employs distinct strategies, timeframes, position-sizing rules, and risk management protocols, all powered by Tickeron's proprietary Financial Learning Models (FLMs). Exploring the Trending AI Robots page can help traders identify which AI-driven strategies are currently aligned with the market's evolving dynamics.
When comparing FLR and MTZ, several structural differences stand out. First, business model and geographic focus: Fluor operates globally with a heavy emphasis on mega-scale EPC projects, including work for government agencies and energy majors across multiple continents. MasTec is far more concentrated in North America, where it executes a high volume of mid-to-large infrastructure projects across telecommunications, power grids, and renewables. Fluor's international exposure introduces currency and geopolitical risk, while MasTec's domestic focus ties its fortunes more directly to U.S. infrastructure spending trends and federal policy.
Second, growth trajectory and earnings quality: MasTec has delivered consistently positive earnings momentum, with full-year 2025 GAAP diluted EPS of $5.07 and adjusted diluted EPS of $6.55, both representing substantial year-over-year gains. Fluor, by contrast, reported a GAAP net loss in 2025, heavily impacted by the Santos legal ruling and NuScale valuation adjustments. Even on an adjusted basis, Fluor's $2.19 in adjusted EPS pales in comparison to MasTec's profitability on a per-share basis, though Fluor's enterprise value is also significantly smaller.
Third, valuation and market perception: MasTec trades at a trailing P/E (Price-to-Earnings ratio) near 59, reflecting a growth premium, while Fluor's trailing P/E sits around 24. MasTec's market capitalization of roughly $26.7 billion dwarfs Fluor's approximately $7.3 billion, underscoring the market's stronger conviction in MasTec's earnings power. However, Fluor's lower price-to-sales ratio (approximately 0.55) and ongoing share buybacks may appeal to value-oriented investors.
Fourth, risk factors: Fluor faces litigation overhang and project execution risk on legacy contracts, while MasTec's primary risk relates to the cyclicality of its end markets, potential permitting delays (as seen with the Greenlink project), and cash flow lumpiness tied to working capital needs during periods of rapid growth.
Based on observable data across trend consistency, earnings momentum, backlog growth, and market sentiment, Tickeron's AI-driven analytical framework would likely favor MasTec (MTZ) in the current market environment. MasTec's record revenue, expanding backlog, raised guidance, and broad-based demand across all four operating segments present a cleaner growth narrative with fewer idiosyncratic risks. Fluor's story, while containing potentially undervalued elements — including the NuScale monetization tailwind and an aggressive buyback program — remains clouded by project-level cost issues, litigation uncertainty, and uneven segment profitability. AI models trained on momentum, volatility, and fundamental trend signals would tend to recognize MasTec's stronger and more consistent upward trajectory. That said, the probabilistic nature of AI analysis acknowledges that Fluor's discounted valuation and capital return catalysts could narrow the performance gap should the company successfully execute on its 2026 recovery plan. Neither assessment represents a definitive prediction, but rather a data-informed directional read on relative strength.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
FLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -8.12% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +9.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -2.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.08%.
FLR is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| FLR | MTZ | FLR / MTZ | |
| Capitalization | 7B | 23.9B | 29% |
| EBITDA | -206M | 1.31B | -16% |
| Gain YTD | 32.147 | 36.905 | 87% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.26 | 47.39 | 47% |
| Revenue | 15.2B | 16.1B | 94% |
| Total Cash | 3.67B | 316M | 1,162% |
| Total Debt | 1.07B | 3.24B | 33% |
FLR | MTZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 86 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 68 Overvalued | 82 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 40 | 45 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 69 | 56 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 61 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLR's Valuation (68) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (82). This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
FLR's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (45). This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's SMR Rating (56) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (69). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
FLR's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as MTZ (62). This means that FLR’s stock grew similarly to MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
FLR's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (61). This means that FLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
| FLR | MTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 70% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 1 day ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 64% | 13 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 64% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 62% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| CRYPTO / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| DYM.X | 0.014491 | 0.000256 | +1.80% |
| Dymension cryptocurrency | |||
| LINK.X | 8.966766 | 0.098591 | +1.11% |
| Chainlink cryptocurrency | |||
| ALPHA.X | 0.000369 | 0.000001 | +0.16% |
| Stella cryptocurrency | |||
| BAT.X | 0.056592 | -0.000817 | -1.42% |
| Basic Attention Token cryptocurrency | |||
| DODO.X | 0.022380 | -0.000369 | -1.62% |
| DODO cryptocurrency | |||