Advertisement
FLR vs MTZ
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLR is a StrongBuy and MTZ is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLR’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMTZ’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FLR’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- MTZ’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTZ’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
- MTZ’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
FLR (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +5.36% price change this week, while MTZ (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +3.76% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +2.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +486.96%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLR is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2025.
MTZ is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (+2.37% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
| FLR | MTZ | FLR / MTZ | |
| Capitalization | 7.03B | 14.5B | 48% |
| EBITDA | 525M | 978M | 54% |
| Gain YTD | -11.882 | 35.441 | -34% |
| P/E Ratio | 1.80 | 54.88 | 3% |
| Revenue | 16.3B | 13B | 125% |
| Total Cash | 2.27B | 191M | 1,189% |
| Total Debt | 1.07B | 2.67B | 40% |
FLR | MTZ | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 72 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 89 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 22 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 13 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 41 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 90 | 27 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FLR's Valuation (31) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (89). This means that FLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (41). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
FLR's SMR Rating (13) in the Engineering And Construction industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MTZ (72). This means that FLR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MTZ’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (63). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
MTZ's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Engineering And Construction industry is in the same range as FLR (100). This means that MTZ’s stock grew similarly to FLR’s over the last 12 months.
| FLR | MTZ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 76% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 60% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | 15 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 84% | 1 day ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QARP | 55.29 | 0.59 | +1.07% |
| Xtrackers Russell 1000 US QARP ETF | |||
| FDLO | 63.93 | 0.38 | +0.60% |
| Fidelity Low Volatility Factor ETF | |||
| ISHP | 40.60 | 0.15 | +0.37% |
| First Trust S-Network Glb E-Com ETF | |||
| FCOR | 47.49 | -0.01 | -0.02% |
| Fidelity Corporate Bond ETF | |||
| BSMY | 23.68 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| Invesco BulletShares 2034 Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
FLR and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLR has been loosely correlated with MTZ. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLR jumps, then MTZ could also see price increases.
MTZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTZ has been closely correlated with PWR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MTZ jumps, then PWR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTZ | 100% | +2.98% | ||
| PWR - MTZ | 85% Closely correlated | +1.94% | ||
| EME - MTZ | 84% Closely correlated | +2.91% | ||
| FIX - MTZ | 81% Closely correlated | +3.65% | ||
| STRL - MTZ | 79% Closely correlated | +6.40% | ||
| PRIM - MTZ | 78% Closely correlated | +3.04% | ||
More | ||||