Advertisement
FLUT vs MTN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLUT is a Hold and MTN is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FLUT’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileMTN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- FLUT’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MTN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FLUT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FLUT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- MTN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FLUT (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -4.98% price change this week, while MTN (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -1.45% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -3.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.00%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -0.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.16%.
Reported Earning Dates
FLUT is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
MTN is expected to report earnings on Sep 24, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-3.96% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-0.69% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| FLUT | MTN | FLUT / MTN | |
| Capitalization | 17.6B | 5.19B | 339% |
| EBITDA | 2.05B | 741M | 276% |
| Gain YTD | -52.916 | 13.350 | -396% |
| P/E Ratio | 114.37 | 31.41 | 364% |
| Revenue | 17B | 2.83B | 600% |
| Total Cash | 3.46B | 371M | 931% |
| Total Debt | 12.6B | 3.26B | 387% |
FLUT | MTN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 86 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 78 Overvalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | 43 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 17 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTN's Valuation (6) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLUT (78) in the null industry. This means that MTN’s stock grew significantly faster than FLUT’s over the last 12 months.
MTN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as FLUT (100) in the null industry. This means that MTN’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.
MTN's SMR Rating (43) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLUT (93) in the null industry. This means that MTN’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLUT’s over the last 12 months.
MTN's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as FLUT (64) in the null industry. This means that MTN’s stock grew similarly to FLUT’s over the last 12 months.
MTN's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLUT (99) in the null industry. This means that MTN’s stock grew significantly faster than FLUT’s over the last 12 months.
| FLUT | MTN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 78% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 73% | 1 day ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | 1 day ago 65% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 10 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 70% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 1 day ago 55% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HEWJ | 63.34 | 0.20 | +0.32% |
| iShares Currency Hedged MSCI Japan ETF | |||
| AGRH | 26.22 | -0.02 | -0.08% |
| iShares Interest Rt Hdg U.S. Aggt Bd ETF | |||
| LITL | 33.69 | -0.06 | -0.18% |
| Simplify Piper Sandler Us Small-Cap Plus Income ETF | |||
| VOOG | 79.82 | -0.47 | -0.59% |
| Vanguard S&P 500 Growth ETF | |||
| RZG | 68.47 | -0.42 | -0.61% |
| Invesco S&P SmallCap 600® Pure Gr ETF | |||
FLUT and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLUT has been loosely correlated with BYD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLUT jumps, then BYD could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLUT | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| BYD - FLUT | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| PENN - FLUT | 49% Loosely correlated | +1.04% | ||
| CZR - FLUT | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.13% | ||
| MGM - FLUT | 46% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| RRR - FLUT | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.82% | ||
More | ||||
MTN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTN has been loosely correlated with INSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTN jumps, then INSE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTN | 100% | +1.15% | ||
| INSE - MTN | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| HGV - MTN | 37% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
| CHDN - MTN | 37% Loosely correlated | +3.28% | ||
| FLUT - MTN | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| VAC - MTN | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.61% | ||
More | ||||