Advertisement
HGV vs MTN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HGV is a StrongBuy and MTN is a Hold.
HGV | MTN | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 11 | 39 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | 9 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 23 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 99 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
MTN's Valuation (9) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGV (61) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MTN’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGV’s over the last 12 months.
MTN's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is in the same range as HGV (100) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MTN’s stock grew similarly to HGV’s over the last 12 months.
MTN's SMR Rating (23) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGV (65) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MTN’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGV’s over the last 12 months.
MTN's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HGV (81) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MTN’s stock grew somewhat faster than HGV’s over the last 12 months.
MTN's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Hotels Or Resorts Or Cruiselines industry is significantly better than the same rating for HGV (99) in the Real Estate Development industry. This means that MTN’s stock grew significantly faster than HGV’s over the last 12 months.
| HGV | MTN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 61% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 72% | 9 days ago 57% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 16 days ago 71% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 54% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
HGV’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while MTN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- HGV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- MTN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
HGV’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MTN’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- HGV’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
- MTN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
HGV (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -0.95% price change this week, while MTN (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was +5.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.24%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.82%.
Reported Earning Dates
HGV is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
MTN is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-1.91% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ASEA | 20.25 | 0.06 | +0.30% |
| Global X FTSE Southeast Asia ETF (ASEA) | |||
| IGPT | 100.21 | 0.21 | +0.21% |
| Invesco AI and Next Gen Software ETF (IGPT) | |||
| PFFV | 21.53 | 0.03 | +0.14% |
| Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) | |||
| CPNS | 28.68 | 0.04 | +0.13% |
| Calamos Nasdaq-100 Structured Alt Protection ETF - September (CPNS) | |||
| LIFT | 20.98 | 0.01 | +0.06% |
| LifeX 2028 Income Bucket ETF (LIFT) | |||
HGV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HGV has been loosely correlated with VAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HGV jumps, then VAC could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HGV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HGV | 100% | -0.09% | ||
| VAC - HGV | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.08% | ||
| INSE - HGV | 52% Loosely correlated | +6.53% | ||
| BYD - HGV | 47% Loosely correlated | -1.53% | ||
| DKNG - HGV | 43% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
| CHDN - HGV | 41% Loosely correlated | +4.99% | ||
More | ||||
MTN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MTN has been loosely correlated with INSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MTN jumps, then INSE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To MTN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTN | 100% | -0.04% | ||
| INSE - MTN | 41% Loosely correlated | +6.53% | ||
| HGV - MTN | 39% Loosely correlated | -0.09% | ||
| CHDN - MTN | 37% Loosely correlated | +4.99% | ||
| FLUT - MTN | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.21% | ||
| BYD - MTN | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.53% | ||
More | ||||