FLWS
Price
$4.49
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
698.5M
97 days until earnings call
GPI
Price
$431.29
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
3.96B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLWS vs GPI

Header iconFLWS vs GPI Comparison
Open Charts FLWS vs GPIBanner chart's image
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
Price$4.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$613
Capitalization698.5M
Group 1 Automotive
Price$431.29
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$883
Capitalization3.96B
FLWS vs GPI Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLWS vs. GPI commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLWS is a Hold and GPI is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FLWS: $4.49 vs. GPI: $431.29)
Brand notoriety: FLWS: Notable vs. GPI: Not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLWS: 0% vs. GPI: 1%
Market capitalization -- FLWS: $698.5M vs. GPI: $3.96B
FLWS [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $698.5M. GPI’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $3.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLWS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGPI’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GPI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GPI is a better buy in the long-term than FLWS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLWS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GPI’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLWS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GPI’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FLWS and GPI are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FLWS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -5.47% price change this week, while GPI (@Specialty Stores) price change was -2.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLWS is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

GPI is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.03% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GPI($3.96B) has a higher market cap than FLWS($699M). FLWS has higher P/E ratio than GPI: FLWS (156.25) vs GPI (6.77). GPI YTD gains are higher at: 2.439 vs. FLWS (-45.043). GPI has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.06B vs. FLWS (1.43M). FLWS has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. GPI (57.2M). FLWS has less debt than GPI: FLWS (318M) vs GPI (3.9B). GPI has higher revenues than FLWS: GPI (17.9B) vs FLWS (1.91B).
FLWSGPIFLWS / GPI
Capitalization699M3.96B18%
EBITDA1.43M1.06B0%
Gain YTD-45.0432.439-1,847%
P/E Ratio156.256.772,307%
Revenue1.91B17.9B11%
Total Cash312M57.2M545%
Total Debt318M3.9B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLWS vs GPI: Fundamental Ratings
FLWS
GPI
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
810
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1006
SMR RATING
1..100
9451
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9246
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
212
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GPI's Valuation (67) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as FLWS (86) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that GPI’s stock grew similarly to FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that GPI’s stock grew significantly faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's SMR Rating (51) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (94) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that GPI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

GPI's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (92) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that GPI’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

FLWS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Internet Retail industry is in the same range as GPI (12) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew similarly to GPI’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLWSGPI
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GPI
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSPRX12.74N/A
N/A
Voya Small Company Port R6
AGOCX12.08N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income C
VOLMX22.98N/A
N/A
Volumetric
PLLAX24.25N/A
N/A
Principal SmallCap A
FTYCX42.33N/A
N/A
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq C

FLWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLWS
1D Price
Change %
FLWS100%
N/A
RH - FLWS
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RUSHA - FLWS
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
GPI - FLWS
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PAG - FLWS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
SAH - FLWS
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

GPI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GPI has been closely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GPI jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GPI
1D Price
Change %
GPI100%
N/A
ABG - GPI
83%
Closely correlated
N/A
AN - GPI
81%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
SAH - GPI
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
PAG - GPI
78%
Closely correlated
+0.31%
LAD - GPI
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
More