FLWS
Price
$4.49
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
698.5M
97 days until earnings call
PAG
Price
$162.66
Change
+$0.50 (+0.31%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
10.86B
61 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FLWS vs PAG

Header iconFLWS vs PAG Comparison
Open Charts FLWS vs PAGBanner chart's image
1-800-FLOWERS.COM
Price$4.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$613
Capitalization698.5M
Penske Automotive Group
Price$162.66
Change+$0.50 (+0.31%)
Volume$300.87K
Capitalization10.86B
FLWS vs PAG Comparison Chart
Loading...
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FLWS vs. PAG commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FLWS is a Hold and PAG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FLWS: $4.49 vs. PAG: $162.66)
Brand notoriety: FLWS: Notable vs. PAG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FLWS: 0% vs. PAG: 114%
Market capitalization -- FLWS: $698.5M vs. PAG: $10.86B
FLWS [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $698.5M. PAG’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $10.86B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FLWS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FLWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the long-term than FLWS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FLWS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FLWS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAG is a better buy in the short-term than FLWS.

Price Growth

FLWS (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -5.47% price change this week, while PAG (@Specialty Stores) price change was -1.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.81%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.53%.

Reported Earning Dates

FLWS is expected to report earnings on Aug 28, 2025.

PAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (-2.00% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAG($10.9B) has a higher market cap than FLWS($699M). FLWS has higher P/E ratio than PAG: FLWS (156.25) vs PAG (10.37). PAG YTD gains are higher at: 7.506 vs. FLWS (-45.043). PAG has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.79B vs. FLWS (1.43M). FLWS has more cash in the bank: 312M vs. PAG (96.4M). FLWS has less debt than PAG: FLWS (318M) vs PAG (7.74B). PAG has higher revenues than FLWS: PAG (29.5B) vs FLWS (1.91B).
FLWSPAGFLWS / PAG
Capitalization699M10.9B6%
EBITDA1.43M1.79B0%
Gain YTD-45.0437.506-600%
P/E Ratio156.2510.371,507%
Revenue1.91B29.5B6%
Total Cash312M96.4M324%
Total Debt318M7.74B4%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FLWS vs PAG: Fundamental Ratings
FLWS
PAG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
810
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
9447
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9251
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
237
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PAG's Valuation (30) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (86) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for FLWS (100) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew significantly faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's SMR Rating (47) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (94) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

PAG's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FLWS (92) in the Internet Retail industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FLWS’s over the last 12 months.

FLWS's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Internet Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAG (37) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that FLWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FLWSPAG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FLWS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VSPRX12.74N/A
N/A
Voya Small Company Port R6
AGOCX12.08N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Global Equity Income C
VOLMX22.98N/A
N/A
Volumetric
PLLAX24.25N/A
N/A
Principal SmallCap A
FTYCX42.33N/A
N/A
FullerThaler Behavioral Sm-Cp Eq C

FLWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLWS has been loosely correlated with RH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLWS jumps, then RH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLWS
1D Price
Change %
FLWS100%
N/A
RH - FLWS
54%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RUSHA - FLWS
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.56%
GPI - FLWS
49%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PAG - FLWS
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.31%
SAH - FLWS
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
More

PAG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with GPI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then GPI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAG
1D Price
Change %
PAG100%
+0.31%
GPI - PAG
85%
Closely correlated
N/A
ABG - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
SAH - PAG
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
AN - PAG
80%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
LAD - PAG
71%
Closely correlated
N/A
More