Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FMCAX vs FSMAX
FMCAX vs FSMAX Comparison
Open Charts FMCAX vs FSMAX
FMCAX vs FSMAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FMCAX vs. FSMAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMCAX is a Hold and FSMAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSMAX has more cash in the bank: 42.7B vs. FMCAX (2.54B). FSMAX pays higher dividends than FMCAX: FSMAX (0.50) vs FMCAX (0.28). FMCAX was incepted earlier than FSMAX: FMCAX (30 years) vs FSMAX (15 years). FMCAX (1.22) is less costly to investors than FSMAX (0.04). FMCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 55.00 vs. FSMAX (23.00). FMCAX (0) and FSMAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSMAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 30.47 vs. FMCAX (23.71). FSMAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.19 vs. FMCAX (13.37).
| FMCAX | FSMAX | FMCAX / FSMAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.04 | 3,486% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.22 | 0.04 | 3,486% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.973 | 15.556 | 135% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.54B | 42.7B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.28 | 0.50 | 56% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.71 | 30.47 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 49.76 | 74.03 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.37 | 35.19 | 38% |
| Returns for 10 years | 76.11 | 153.75 | 49% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers