FMET
Price
$35.61
Change
+$0.14 (+0.39%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:42 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
42.59M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
XLC
Price
$106.13
Change
+$0.54 (+0.51%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
21.75B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMET vs XLC

FMET vs XLC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which ETF would AI Choose? Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) vs. State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC)

Key Takeaways

  • FMET offers targeted thematic exposure to metaverse-enabling companies with heavy technology tilt (around 56%), while XLC provides broad, passive access to the U.S. communication services sector (100% allocation).
  • FMET holds approximately 64 stocks globally, promoting greater diversification than XLC's concentrated 23-25 large-cap U.S. holdings, where top 10 account for over 60% of assets.
  • XLC features a significantly lower expense ratio of 0.08% compared to FMET's 0.39%, enhancing cost efficiency for long-term investors.
  • Both ETFs exhibit high volatility tied to tech and media trends, but FMET's global and thematic focus introduces additional emerging market and innovation risks.
  • Recent market cycles show communication services resilience amid AI and digital ad growth, benefiting XLC's mega-cap anchors like META and GOOGL.
  • FMET suits growth-oriented investors betting on metaverse expansion, while XLC appeals to those seeking established sector stability.

Introduction

In today's digital economy, investors seek targeted exposure to communication and technology-driven growth. The Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) and State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC) offer distinct pathways within overlapping themes. FMET targets innovative companies building the metaverse infrastructure, while XLC tracks the broad communication services sector of the S&P 500. These ETFs do not compete directly but provide alternative strategies: FMET for high-conviction thematic bets and XLC for diversified sector rotation. Amid AI advancements and digital transformation, comparing their structures reveals opportunities in sector exposure and risk profiles, aiding portfolio positioning in evolving market cycles.

Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) Overview

The Fidelity Metaverse ETF (FMET) is a passively managed thematic equity fund launched in April 2022 by Fidelity. It seeks to track the Fidelity Metaverse Index, focusing on a global universe of companies developing, manufacturing, distributing, or selling products and services related to the metaverse—a persistent network of virtual and augmented realities. The fund holds around 64 stocks, providing moderate diversification across large-, mid-, and small-cap names.

Top holdings include AMD (approximately 8%), QCOM (6%), GOOGL (5%), NVIDIA (NVDA, 4-5%), and Equinix (EQIX). Sector allocations emphasize Technology (56%), Communication Services (35%), and Real Estate (8%), reflecting hardware, software, and data center enablers. The expense ratio is 0.39%, with assets under management (AUM, total assets in the fund) around $47 million. As a market-cap-weighted passive strategy, it rebalances periodically to mirror the index, prioritizing liquidity and global reach over U.S.-centric focus.

State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC) Overview

The State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLC), launched in June 2018 by State Street Global Advisors, is a passive index ETF tracking the Communication Services Select Sector Index—a subset of the S&P 500. It invests at least 95% of assets in sector constituents, including diversified and wireless telecom, media, entertainment, and interactive media/services per Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS).

With 23-25 holdings, it is highly concentrated in mega-caps. Top holdings feature META (13-14%), GOOGL (10%), GOOG (8%), Take-Two Interactive (TTWO, 4-5%), and Walt Disney (DIS). The portfolio is 100% Communication Services, spanning sub-industries like interactive media (32%), entertainment (30%), and media (23%). Expense ratio stands at a low 0.08%, with AUM exceeding $25 billion for superior liquidity. Market-cap weighted and quarterly rebalanced, it emphasizes stable, large-cap U.S. leaders.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The communication services sector, encompassing telecom, media, and interactive platforms, benefits from robust digital ad spending, streaming proliferation, and AI integration. Capital flows favor mega-caps driving content and connectivity amid macroeconomic shifts like interest rate stabilization. Regulatory scrutiny on antitrust and data privacy persists, alongside geopolitical tensions affecting supply chains.

Metaverse trends gain traction with virtual events, gaming, and VR/AR adoption, projected to expand significantly through 2030. Catalysts include AI personalization, blockchain for digital assets, and hyperscaler investments in immersive tech. Sector risks involve ad cyclicality, content costs, and competition from emerging platforms, yet AI-driven efficiencies and 5G rollout support long-term growth in recent market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, XLC has demonstrated relative stability, buoyed by resilient earnings from top holdings like META and Alphabet amid digital advertising recovery and sector rotation toward defensives. FMET, with heavier tech hardware exposure via AMD and NVDA, shows higher volatility linked to semiconductor cycles and metaverse hype fluctuations.

Over broader cycles, both benefit from AI tailwinds—XLC via platform monetization, FMET through enabling infrastructure. XLC's large-cap focus yields lower beta (around 0.8-1.0), while FMET's global tilt amplifies swings from interest rates and commodity trends in chips. Relative positioning favors XLC in risk-off environments, FMET in growth rotations.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener identifies trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening, empowering data-driven decisions across asset classes. Explore it today to enhance your ETF comparison and strategy development.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors XLC due to its superior cost efficiency (0.08% expense ratio), massive liquidity ($25B+ AUM), and consistent trend alignment with broad communication services momentum. While FMET offers intriguing diversification and metaverse upside, its higher costs, smaller scale, and elevated volatility profile introduce comparatively higher risk exposure. Probabilistic edge tilts toward XLC for balanced sector positioning in prevailing macro conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
FMET vs. XLC commentary
Jun 27, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMET is a Hold and XLC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
XLC has more net assets: 21.7B vs. FMET (42.6M). FMET has a higher annual dividend yield than XLC: FMET (-1.325) vs XLC (-9.793). FMET was incepted earlier than XLC: FMET (4 years) vs XLC (8 years). XLC (0.08) has a lower expense ratio than FMET (0.39). XLC has a higher turnover FMET (30.00) vs FMET (30.00).
FMETXLCFMET / XLC
Gain YTD-1.325-9.79314%
Net Assets42.6M21.7B0%
Total Expense Ratio0.390.08488%
Turnover30.0040.0075%
Yield0.501.2142%
Fund Existence4 years8 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMETXLC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
85%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMET
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
XLC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HRZN4.410.15
+3.64%
Horizon Technology Finance Corp
MRVL281.264.56
+1.65%
Marvell Technology
CSWC23.290.35
+1.53%
Capital Southwest Corp
QMMM119.40N/A
N/A
QMMM Holdings Ltd
RDAC5.60N/A
N/A
Rising Dragon Acquisition Corp.

FMET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FMET has been closely correlated with AMD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FMET jumps, then AMD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FMET
1D Price
Change %
FMET100%
-1.29%
AMD - FMET
68%
Closely correlated
+2.47%
MPWR - FMET
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
NVDA - FMET
63%
Loosely correlated
-1.64%
GDS - FMET
61%
Loosely correlated
-6.17%
QCOM - FMET
60%
Loosely correlated
+3.79%
More

XLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, XLC has been loosely correlated with META. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if XLC jumps, then META could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To XLC
1D Price
Change %
XLC100%
-0.90%
META - XLC
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.65%
GOOG - XLC
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.83%
GOOGL - XLC
59%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
DIS - XLC
49%
Loosely correlated
-3.04%
NWSA - XLC
46%
Loosely correlated
-0.79%
More