FMNB
Price
$14.14
Change
+$0.11 (+0.78%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
836.71M
40 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBWM
Price
$53.75
Change
+$0.49 (+0.92%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
927.63M
32 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FMNB vs MBWM

FMNB vs MBWM Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FMNB vs. MBWM commentary
Jun 19, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FMNB is a Hold and MBWM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 19, 2026
Stock price -- (FMNB: $14.03 vs. MBWM: $53.26)
Brand notoriety: FMNB and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FMNB: 172% vs. MBWM: 175%
Market capitalization -- FMNB: $836.71M vs. MBWM: $927.63M
FMNB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $836.71M. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $927.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FMNB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FMNB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than FMNB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FMNB’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FMNB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the short-term than FMNB.

Price Growth

FMNB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.37% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.06% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.68%.

Reported Earning Dates

FMNB is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Jul 21, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.10% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBWM($928M) has a higher market cap than FMNB($837M). FMNB (9.74) and MBWM (9.62) have similar P/E ratio . MBWM YTD gains are higher at: 12.398 vs. FMNB (7.932). FMNB has less debt than MBWM: FMNB (435M) vs MBWM (484M). MBWM has higher revenues than FMNB: MBWM (253M) vs FMNB (200M).
FMNBMBWMFMNB / MBWM
Capitalization837M928M90%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD7.93212.39864%
P/E Ratio9.749.62101%
Revenue200M253M79%
Total CashN/A48.4M-
Total Debt435M484M90%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FMNB vs MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
FMNB
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3833
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9921
SMR RATING
1..100
6246
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5547
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FMNB's Valuation (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (34). This means that FMNB’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FMNB (99). This means that MBWM’s stock grew significantly faster than FMNB’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMNB (62). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FMNB’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMNB (49). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FMNB’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's P/E Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FMNB (55). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FMNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FMNBMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
64%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FMNB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CNWEX106.16-0.35
-0.33%
American Funds New World 529E
IHOTX25.45-0.21
-0.82%
Hartford International Opportunities R5
MDVYX9.27-0.09
-0.96%
MassMutual Diversified Value Svc
GSCTX14.31-0.16
-1.11%
Goldman Sachs Small Cp Val Insghts C
BGLAX12.59-0.21
-1.64%
Brookfield Global Listed InfrastructureA

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with SRCE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then SRCE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
-2.02%
SRCE - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
-1.51%
THFF - MBWM
87%
Closely correlated
-1.18%
IBCP - MBWM
87%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
FRME - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
-1.60%
EFSC - MBWM
86%
Closely correlated
-1.20%
More