FNB
Price
$14.78
Change
-$0.34 (-2.25%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.97B
57 days until earnings call
WAL
Price
$87.04
Change
-$2.69 (-3.00%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
6.88B
53 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FNB vs WAL

Header iconFNB vs WAL Comparison
Open Charts FNB vs WALBanner chart's image
FNB
Price$14.78
Change-$0.34 (-2.25%)
Volume$1.92M
Capitalization4.97B
Western Alliance Ban
Price$87.04
Change-$2.69 (-3.00%)
Volume$1.78M
Capitalization6.88B
FNB vs WAL Comparison Chart
Loading...
FNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FNB vs. WAL commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FNB is a Hold and WAL is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FNB: $14.78 vs. WAL: $87.04)
Brand notoriety: FNB and WAL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FNB: 77% vs. WAL: 147%
Market capitalization -- FNB: $4.97B vs. WAL: $6.88B
FNB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $4.97B. WAL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FNB’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWAL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FNB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WAL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the long-term than WAL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FNB’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WAL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FNB’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WAL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FNB is a better buy in the short-term than WAL.

Price Growth

FNB (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.27% price change this week, while WAL (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

FNB is expected to report earnings on Apr 21, 2025.

WAL is expected to report earnings on Apr 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WAL($6.88B) has a higher market cap than FNB($4.97B). FNB has higher P/E ratio than WAL: FNB (10.55) vs WAL (9.55). WAL YTD gains are higher at: 4.645 vs. FNB (0.000). FNB has more cash in the bank: 447M vs. WAL (289M). FNB has less debt than WAL: FNB (3.98B) vs WAL (8.12B). WAL has higher revenues than FNB: WAL (2.13B) vs FNB (1.57B).
FNBWALFNB / WAL
Capitalization4.97B6.88B72%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0004.645-
P/E Ratio10.559.55110%
Revenue1.57B2.13B74%
Total Cash447M289M155%
Total Debt3.98B8.12B49%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FNB vs WAL: Fundamental Ratings
FNB
WAL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
227
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
47
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3563
SMR RATING
1..100
108
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5950
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3620
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FNB's Valuation (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAL (73). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to WAL’s over the last 12 months.

FNB's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as WAL (63). This means that FNB’s stock grew similarly to WAL’s over the last 12 months.

WAL's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (10). This means that WAL’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

WAL's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (59). This means that WAL’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

WAL's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FNB (36). This means that WAL’s stock grew similarly to FNB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FNBWAL
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FNB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
WAL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PZT22.970.08
+0.35%
Invesco New York AMT-Free Muni Bd ETF
QULL50.250.10
+0.19%
ETRACS 2x Lvrgd MSCI US Qlty Fctr TR ETN
KBWD15.58-0.11
-0.70%
Invesco KBW High Dividend Yld Fincl ETF
KLXY26.05-0.19
-0.71%
KraneShares Global Luxury Index ETF
AOA79.10-0.76
-0.95%
iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allc ETF

FNB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FNB has been closely correlated with WTFC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FNB jumps, then WTFC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FNB
1D Price
Change %
FNB100%
-2.25%
WTFC - FNB
92%
Closely correlated
-3.90%
ASB - FNB
92%
Closely correlated
-2.63%
HWC - FNB
90%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
HOMB - FNB
89%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
UBSI - FNB
88%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
More