MFIN
Price
$9.98
Change
-$0.02 (-0.20%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
230.43M
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RM
Price
$43.26
Change
-$0.24 (-0.55%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
398.34M
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

MFIN vs RM

MFIN vs RM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
MFIN vs. RM commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is MFIN is a StrongBuy and RM is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (MFIN: $9.98 vs. RM: $43.26)
Brand notoriety: MFIN and RM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Savings Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: MFIN: 19% vs. RM: 115%
Market capitalization -- MFIN: $230.43M vs. RM: $398.34M
MFIN [@Savings Banks] is valued at $230.43M. RM’s [@Savings Banks] market capitalization is $398.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Savings Banks] industry ranges from $680.35B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Savings Banks] industry is $33.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

MFIN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileRM’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • MFIN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • RM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, MFIN is a better buy in the long-term than RM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

MFIN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • MFIN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RM is a better buy in the short-term than MFIN.

Price Growth

MFIN (@Savings Banks) experienced а -0.60% price change this week, while RM (@Savings Banks) price change was +3.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was -3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

MFIN is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

RM is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Savings Banks (-3.70% weekly)

A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RM($398M) has a higher market cap than MFIN($230M). RM has higher P/E ratio than MFIN: RM (8.77) vs MFIN (6.74). RM YTD gains are higher at: 13.605 vs. MFIN (-0.235). MFIN has more cash in the bank: 15.8M vs. RM (3.82M). MFIN has less debt than RM: MFIN (265M) vs RM (1.66B). RM has higher revenues than MFIN: RM (572M) vs MFIN (236M).
MFINRMMFIN / RM
Capitalization230M398M58%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.23513.605-2%
P/E Ratio6.748.7777%
Revenue236M572M41%
Total Cash15.8M3.82M413%
Total Debt265M1.66B16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MFIN vs RM: Fundamental Ratings
MFIN
RM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9384
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
11
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5894
SMR RATING
1..100
5735
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4941
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3664
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFIN's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as RM (16) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that MFIN’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

MFIN's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RM (94) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that MFIN’s stock grew somewhat faster than RM’s over the last 12 months.

RM's SMR Rating (35) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MFIN (57) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to MFIN’s over the last 12 months.

RM's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as MFIN (49) in the null industry. This means that RM’s stock grew similarly to MFIN’s over the last 12 months.

MFIN's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as RM (64) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that MFIN’s stock grew similarly to RM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
MFINRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
MFIN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLAAX33.910.03
+0.09%
Value Line Asset Allocation Inv
ENPIX54.29N/A
N/A
ProFunds UltraSector Energy Investor
JMVYX35.67N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value R6
FTIEX16.79N/A
N/A
Fidelity Total International Equity
MLVKX39.27N/A
N/A
BlackRock Advantage Large Cap Val K

MFIN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MFIN has been loosely correlated with RM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MFIN jumps, then RM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MFIN
1D Price
Change %
MFIN100%
-0.20%
RM - MFIN
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
OMF - MFIN
40%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CACC - MFIN
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.03%
NAVI - MFIN
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.31%
SYF - MFIN
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.06%
More