Advertisement
FORM vs GCTS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORM is a Buy and GCTS is a StrongBuy.
FORM | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 67 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FORM | GCTS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 59% | 1 day ago 32% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 64% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 53% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 72% | 1 day ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 35% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 79% | 8 days ago 67% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 70% | 11 days ago 83% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 50% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 82% | 1 day ago 19% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FORM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while GCTS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FORM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GCTS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FORM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCTS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FORM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
- GCTS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FORM (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -7.62% price change this week, while GCTS (@Semiconductors) price change was -1.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -6.13%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.70%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was -2.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +39.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
FORM is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.
GCTS is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (-6.13% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (-2.54% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GUT | 6.02 | 0.16 | +2.73% |
| Gabelli Utility Trust | |||
| BUYO | 32.63 | 0.16 | +0.50% |
| KraneShares Man Buyout Beta Index ETF (BUYO) | |||
| SKOR | 46.85 | 0.06 | +0.12% |
| Northern Trust Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond ETF (SKOR) | |||
| CEV | 10.07 | -0.09 | -0.89% |
| Eaton Vance California Municipal Income Trust | |||
| IVW | 144.09 | -1.80 | -1.23% |
| iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW) | |||
FORM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORM has been closely correlated with COHU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FORM jumps, then COHU could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FORM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORM | 100% | -1.91% | ||
| COHU - FORM | 76% Closely correlated | -3.40% | ||
| AMAT - FORM | 75% Closely correlated | -2.13% | ||
| RMBS - FORM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.70% | ||
| NVMI - FORM | 74% Closely correlated | -6.14% | ||
| SLAB - FORM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.09% | ||
More | ||||
GCTS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GCTS has been loosely correlated with VECO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GCTS jumps, then VECO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GCTS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GCTS | 100% | +1.94% | ||
| VECO - GCTS | 35% Loosely correlated | -3.89% | ||
| CAMT - GCTS | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.12% | ||
| ENTG - GCTS | 35% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| FORM - GCTS | 34% Loosely correlated | -1.91% | ||
| COHU - GCTS | 33% Poorly correlated | -3.40% | ||
More | ||||