Advertisement
FORM vs NVDA
Which Stock Would AI Choose? FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) vs. NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- FORM has delivered explosive YTD gains of nearly 160% and 386% over one year, vastly outpacing the S&P 500, fueled by record semiconductor testing demand.
- NVDA, the AI chip leader, shows YTD return of 5% and 73% annually, with steadier but massive scale in data center revenue growth.
- Recent FORM Q1 earnings hit records at $226M revenue (+32% YoY), with strong HBM (high-bandwidth memory) and foundry probe card demand.
- Tickeron AI bots trading semiconductor baskets including both stocks show annualized returns up to 71%, highlighting sector momentum.
- FORM trades at higher P/E (167x) versus NVDA's 40x, reflecting growth premium amid AI infrastructure buildout.
- Both benefit from AI tailwinds, but FORM's recent momentum edges in relative performance for short-term traders.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines FORM (FormFactor, Inc.), a key provider of semiconductor testing solutions, against NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation), the dominant force in AI GPUs and data center chips. Both operate in the semiconductor ecosystem, riding the wave of artificial intelligence expansion, high-bandwidth memory needs, and advanced chip production. Investors eyeing AI infrastructure growth, from chip design to testing, or traders seeking relative performance in volatile tech sectors, will find value in contrasting their business models, recent momentum, and market positioning. This analysis draws on recent earnings, price action, and sector trends for objective insights.
FORM Overview and Recent Performance
FormFactor, Inc. (FORM) specializes in probe cards, analytical probes, and systems for semiconductor testing across the product lifecycle, serving DRAM, foundry/logic, and emerging quantum applications. In recent market activity, FORM shares have surged, trading around $145 with YTD gains of 160% and 386% over one year, far exceeding broader indices. This momentum stems from Q1 2026 results showing record revenue of $226.1 million (+32% YoY, +5% QoQ), non-GAAP EPS of $0.56 (beating estimates), and gross margins expanding to 49%. Strong demand for high-bandwidth memory (HBM) probe cards and networking in foundry/logic segments drove performance, with Q2 guidance at $240 million revenue. Sentiment has shifted positively on AI-driven testing needs, though volatility persists in semiconductor cycles.
NVDA Overview and Recent Performance
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) leads in accelerated computing, AI infrastructure, GPUs for data centers, gaming, and automotive. Shares hover near $196, with modest YTD return of 5% amid consolidation, but 73% one-year gains reflect enduring AI dominance. Recent weeks show stabilization after prior rallies, supported by robust prior-quarter data center revenue growth (up 73% YoY to $68B in Q4 FY2026). Analysts anticipate Q1 FY2027 earnings on May 20 with EPS around $1.77, fueled by Blackwell platform demand. Market sentiment balances high expectations with valuation scrutiny, as hyperscaler AI capex sustains long-term positioning, though short-term pullbacks highlight sector rotation risks.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from 351 AI trading bots, selected by advanced algorithms for superior adaptation to current market conditions across thousands of tickers. These bots employ diverse strategies—momentum, sector rotation, volatility filters—on timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, delivering annualized returns ranging 23% to 169%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7. Semiconductor-focused bots, like those trading NVDA, AVGO, AMD (71% annualized) or FORM, KLAC, LRCX (63% annualized), underscore AI infrastructure strength. Ideal for copy trading, they offer real-time signals via Signal, Virtual, or Brokerage Agents. Explore these high-conviction options to enhance your strategy in dynamic markets.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FORM and NVDA both thrive in AI/semiconductor supply chains, but diverge in roles: NVDA designs market-leading GPUs and networking for data centers (Compute & Networking segment dominant), while FORM enables testing via probe cards/systems (Probe Cards segment ~80% revenue). Growth drivers contrast—NVDA leverages hyperscaler AI capex for trillion-dollar platforms; FORM rides HBM/DRAM testing surge. Recent momentum favors FORM (160% YTD vs. 5%), but NVDA offers scale ($4.8T market cap vs. $11B). Risks: FORM faces cyclical testing demand; NVDA high P/E (40x) amid competition. Sector exposure aligns on semis/AI, with sentiment tilting to FORM for short-term outperformance amid testing bottlenecks.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors FORM for its superior recent trend consistency, with 160% YTD returns, record earnings beats, and HBM catalysts signaling sustained momentum in AI testing. NVDA maintains strong relative positioning via scale and upcoming earnings, but FORM shows higher probabilistic upside in the near term based on volatility-optimized bot performance in semis. Observable factors like guidance beats and sector rotation support this edge, though both warrant monitoring for AI ecosystem shifts.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FORM is a Hold and NVDA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FORM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNVDA’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- FORM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- NVDA’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FORM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NVDA’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FORM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- NVDA’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FORM (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а -14.61% price change this week, while NVDA (@Semiconductors) price change was +4.70% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was -0.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +20.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +140.48%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Semiconductors industry was +4.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +39.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +81.10%.
Reported Earning Dates
FORM is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
NVDA is expected to report earnings on May 20, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Electronic Production Equipment (-0.97% weekly)The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
@Semiconductors (+4.47% weekly)The semiconductor industry manufacturers all chip-related products, including research and development. These chips are used in innumerable electronic devices, including computers, cell phones, smartphones, and GPSs. Intel Corporation, NVIDIA Corp., and Broadcomm are some of the prominent players in this industry. Semiconductor companies usually tend to do well during periods of healthy economic growth, thereby inducing further research and development in the industry – which in turn augurs well for productivity and growth in the economy. In the near future, demand for semiconductor products (and possibly innovation within the segment) should only expand further, with the proliferation of 5G, autonomous vehicles, IoT, and various AI-driven electronics set to herald a new, advanced chapter in the technology-driven world as we know it. With burgeoning prospects comes great competition. In 2015, SIA estimated that U.S. semiconductor industry ranks as the second most competitive U.S. industry out of 2882 U.S. industries designated manufacturers by the U.S. Census Bureau.
| FORM | NVDA | FORM / NVDA | |
| Capitalization | 9.84B | 5.46T | 0% |
| EBITDA | 128M | 145B | 0% |
| Gain YTD | 126.371 | 20.822 | 607% |
| P/E Ratio | 145.13 | 45.98 | 316% |
| Revenue | 840M | 216B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 303M | 62.6B | 0% |
| Total Debt | 31.9M | 11B | 0% |
FORM | NVDA | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 89 | 33 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 81 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | 7 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 80 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 18 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 5 | 47 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NVDA's Valuation (81) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FORM (84) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that NVDA’s stock grew similarly to FORM’s over the last 12 months.
NVDA's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FORM (23) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that NVDA’s stock grew similarly to FORM’s over the last 12 months.
NVDA's SMR Rating (13) in the Semiconductors industry is significantly better than the same rating for FORM (80) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that NVDA’s stock grew significantly faster than FORM’s over the last 12 months.
NVDA's Price Growth Rating (18) in the Semiconductors industry is in the same range as FORM (36) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry. This means that NVDA’s stock grew similarly to FORM’s over the last 12 months.
FORM's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NVDA (47) in the Semiconductors industry. This means that FORM’s stock grew somewhat faster than NVDA’s over the last 12 months.
| FORM | NVDA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 57% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 17 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 57% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| XIMR | 31.51 | -0.02 | -0.06% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Buf & Prm Inc ETF - Mar | |||
| LRGC | 82.64 | -0.95 | -1.14% |
| AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF | |||
| TMAT | 27.71 | -0.68 | -2.40% |
| Main Thematic Innovation ETF | |||
| ZAP | 33.08 | -0.95 | -2.79% |
| Global X U.S. Electrification ETF | |||
| LINT | 172.45 | -24.56 | -12.47% |
| Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X ETF | |||
FORM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FORM has been closely correlated with RMBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FORM jumps, then RMBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FORM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FORM | 100% | -1.34% | ||
| RMBS - FORM | 74% Closely correlated | -2.61% | ||
| SLAB - FORM | 73% Closely correlated | -0.33% | ||
| ADI - FORM | 72% Closely correlated | -2.18% | ||
| ARM - FORM | 72% Closely correlated | -8.46% | ||
| QCOM - FORM | 72% Closely correlated | +0.70% | ||
More | ||||