FOSL
Price
$3.04
Change
-$0.06 (-1.94%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
166.73M
49 days until earnings call
TPR
Price
$109.89
Change
+$0.39 (+0.36%)
Updated
Sep 17, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
22.93B
50 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FOSL vs TPR

Header iconFOSL vs TPR Comparison
Open Charts FOSL vs TPRBanner chart's image
Fossil Group
Price$3.04
Change-$0.06 (-1.94%)
Volume$3.11K
Capitalization166.73M
Tapestry
Price$109.89
Change+$0.39 (+0.36%)
Volume$21.47K
Capitalization22.93B
FOSL vs TPR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FOSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FOSL vs. TPR commentary
Sep 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FOSL is a Hold and TPR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 17, 2025
Stock price -- (FOSL: $3.10 vs. TPR: $109.50)
Brand notoriety: FOSL and TPR are both not notable
FOSL represents the Wholesale Distributors, while TPR is part of the Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FOSL: 57% vs. TPR: 69%
Market capitalization -- FOSL: $166.73M vs. TPR: $22.93B
FOSL [@Wholesale Distributors] is valued at $166.73M. TPR’s [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] market capitalization is $22.93B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry ranges from $107.44B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry ranges from $293.65B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Wholesale Distributors] industry is $8.45B. The average market capitalization across the [@Catalog/Specialty Distribution] industry is $39.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FOSL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileTPR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FOSL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • TPR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, TPR is a better buy in the long-term than FOSL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FOSL’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TPR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FOSL’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TPR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TPR is a better buy in the short-term than FOSL.

Price Growth

FOSL (@Wholesale Distributors) experienced а +4.73% price change this week, while TPR (@Catalog/Specialty Distribution) price change was +4.11% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Wholesale Distributors industry was +3.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +11.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +43.59%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Catalog/Specialty Distribution industry was +21.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.30%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

FOSL is expected to report earnings on Nov 05, 2025.

TPR is expected to report earnings on Nov 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Wholesale Distributors (+3.07% weekly)

Companies in this industry handle the wholesale shipments for the manufacturer of a product. They have warehouses and distribution centers, and they ship products directly to the retailer. Digitization, increasing competition, emerging customer demand, and product innovation are some of shifts that the industry has been facing in recent times – something that is potentially creating needs/opportunities for business model revisions or transformations. Data, analytics, and technology are becoming increasingly important for whole distributors in anticipating and analyzing consumer needs, and therefore planning their business strategies accordingly. Fastenal Company, W.W. Grainger, Inc., Genuine Parts Company and Pool Corporation are some of the largest names in the business.

@Catalog/Specialty Distribution (+21.87% weekly)

The catalog and specialty distribution industry includes companies that offer retail through mail-order houses, media, online social platforms, mobile apps and other channels outside of brick-and-mortar stores. Several companies in this business partner with retail companies to assist them with marketing, digital solutions, warehousing, and/or other distribution capabilities. In essence, the industry acts as a potential catalyst for retailers/brands to widen their reach among customers. Pinduoduo Inc., Qurate Retail, Inc. and Baozun are some of the major players in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TPR($22.9B) has a higher market cap than FOSL($167M). FOSL YTD gains are higher at: 85.629 vs. TPR (69.724). TPR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 526M vs. FOSL (-28.76M). TPR has more cash in the bank: 1.12B vs. FOSL (110M). FOSL has less debt than TPR: FOSL (324M) vs TPR (3.9B). TPR has higher revenues than FOSL: TPR (7.01B) vs FOSL (1.08B).
FOSLTPRFOSL / TPR
Capitalization167M22.9B1%
EBITDA-28.76M526M-5%
Gain YTD85.62969.724123%
P/E RatioN/A133.54-
Revenue1.08B7.01B15%
Total Cash110M1.12B10%
Total Debt324M3.9B8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FOSL vs TPR: Fundamental Ratings
FOSL
TPR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7224
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1007
SMR RATING
1..100
9771
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1001
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TPR's Valuation (64) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as FOSL (86) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that TPR’s stock grew similarly to FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

TPR's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for FOSL (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that TPR’s stock grew significantly faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

TPR's SMR Rating (71) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as FOSL (97) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that TPR’s stock grew similarly to FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

TPR's Price Growth Rating (2) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FOSL (35) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that TPR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

TPR's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is significantly better than the same rating for FOSL (100) in the Other Consumer Specialties industry. This means that TPR’s stock grew significantly faster than FOSL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FOSLTPR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FOSL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TPR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMZY15.390.13
+0.85%
YieldMax AMZN Option Income Strategy ETF
ICLN14.890.08
+0.54%
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
NZUS34.59N/A
N/A
SPDR MSCI USA Climate Paris Aligned ETF
PALD22.43N/A
-0.02%
Direxion Daily PANW Bear 1X Shares
TOLL34.05-0.04
-0.12%
Tema Durable Quality ETF

FOSL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FOSL has been loosely correlated with MOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FOSL jumps, then MOV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FOSL
1D Price
Change %
FOSL100%
+2.65%
MOV - FOSL
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
SIG - FOSL
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.02%
SHOO - FOSL
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.51%
DBI - FOSL
30%
Poorly correlated
-4.08%
DECK - FOSL
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
More

TPR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TPR has been loosely correlated with MOV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TPR jumps, then MOV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TPR
1D Price
Change %
TPR100%
-0.61%
MOV - TPR
41%
Loosely correlated
-1.65%
LVMHF - TPR
41%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
LVMUY - TPR
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.45%
PPRUY - TPR
39%
Loosely correlated
+4.31%
CFRUY - TPR
37%
Loosely correlated
+1.46%
More