| FPA | GMF | FPA / GMF | |
| Gain YTD | 37.892 | 13.298 | 285% |
| Net Assets | 113M | 434M | 26% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.80 | 0.49 | 163% |
| Turnover | 104.00 | 6.00 | 1,733% |
| Yield | 3.52 | 1.18 | 299% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 20 years | - |
| FPA | GMF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 9 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
A.I.dvisor tells us that FPA and MCY have been poorly correlated (+19% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPA and MCY's prices will move in lockstep.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GMF has been closely correlated with TSM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GMF jumps, then TSM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GMF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GMF | 100% | +0.79% | ||
| TSM - GMF | 83% Closely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| JD - GMF | 63% Loosely correlated | +0.15% | ||
| BIDU - GMF | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| BILI - GMF | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.45% | ||
| BZUN - GMF | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.36% | ||
More | ||||