FPH
Price
$4.95
Change
+$0.11 (+2.27%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
218.29M
19 days until earnings call
NMRK
Price
$10.39
Change
+$0.03 (+0.29%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.88B
12 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FPH vs NMRK

Header iconFPH vs NMRK Comparison
Open Charts FPH vs NMRKBanner chart's image
Five Point Holdings
Price$4.95
Change+$0.11 (+2.27%)
Volume$108.54K
Capitalization218.29M
Newmark Group
Price$10.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.29%)
Volume$949.02K
Capitalization1.88B
FPH vs NMRK Comparison Chart
Loading...
FPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FPH vs. NMRK commentary
Apr 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPH is a Hold and NMRK is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FPH: $4.95 vs. NMRK: $10.39)
Brand notoriety: FPH and NMRK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FPH: 52% vs. NMRK: 86%
Market capitalization -- FPH: $218.29M vs. NMRK: $1.88B
FPH [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $218.29M. NMRK’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $1.88B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.57B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FPH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNMRK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FPH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NMRK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FPH is a better buy in the long-term than NMRK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FPH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMRK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FPH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NMRK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FPH is a better buy in the short-term than NMRK.

Price Growth

FPH (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +4.21% price change this week, while NMRK (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.58% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.91%.

Reported Earning Dates

FPH is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

NMRK is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.18% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NMRK($1.88B) has a higher market cap than FPH($218M). NMRK has higher P/E ratio than FPH: NMRK (45.33) vs FPH (4.16). FPH YTD gains are higher at: 30.952 vs. NMRK (-18.725). NMRK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 291M vs. FPH (46.1M). FPH has more cash in the bank: 354M vs. NMRK (165M). FPH has less debt than NMRK: FPH (633M) vs NMRK (1.75B). NMRK has higher revenues than FPH: NMRK (2.47B) vs FPH (212M).
FPHNMRKFPH / NMRK
Capitalization218M1.88B12%
EBITDA46.1M291M16%
Gain YTD30.952-18.725-165%
P/E Ratio4.1645.339%
Revenue212M2.47B9%
Total Cash354M165M215%
Total Debt633M1.75B36%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FPH vs NMRK: Fundamental Ratings
FPH
NMRK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6560
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8960
SMR RATING
1..100
7093
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4164
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2072
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NMRK's Valuation (36) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPH (92). This means that NMRK’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPH’s over the last 12 months.

NMRK's Profit vs Risk Rating (60) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FPH (89). This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to FPH’s over the last 12 months.

FPH's SMR Rating (70) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (93). This means that FPH’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.

FPH's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (64). This means that FPH’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.

FPH's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Real Estate Development industry is somewhat better than the same rating for NMRK (72). This means that FPH’s stock grew somewhat faster than NMRK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FPHNMRK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NMRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PBAKX14.840.06
+0.41%
BlackRock Tactical Opportunities K
ITFEX11.65N/A
N/A
Voya International High Div Low Vol S2
CAXCX16.44N/A
N/A
Catalyst/MAP Global Equity C
WHGCX16.85N/A
N/A
Westwood Quality SmallCap Fund C
FNEFX55.15-0.23
-0.42%
American Funds New Economy F3

FPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPH and JLL have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPH and JLL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPH
1D Price
Change %
FPH100%
+2.27%
JLL - FPH
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.22%
RMR - FPH
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.07%
CBRE - FPH
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.35%
NMRK - FPH
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.29%
JOE - FPH
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.02%
More

NMRK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMRK has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMRK jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NMRK
1D Price
Change %
NMRK100%
+0.29%
JLL - NMRK
84%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
CBRE - NMRK
81%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
CWK - NMRK
76%
Closely correlated
+1.60%
MMI - NMRK
75%
Closely correlated
+1.49%
CIGI - NMRK
66%
Closely correlated
+0.58%
More