Advertisement
JLL vs NMRK
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) vs. Newmark (NMRK) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- JLL commands a significantly larger market capitalization of $15.86 billion compared to NMRK's $3.03 billion, reflecting greater scale in the commercial real estate (CRE) services sector.
- In recent weeks, JLL shares have surged over 12%, driven by analyst upgrades and positive sector momentum, outpacing broader market trends.
- Year-to-date (YTD) performance shows NMRK slightly ahead at 5.1% gains versus JLL's 1.6%, amid recovering CRE leasing activity.
- NMRK displays higher volatility with a beta of 1.83 (a measure of stock price sensitivity to market movements) compared to JLL's 1.41.
- Both stocks trade ahead of upcoming quarterly earnings, with JLL at a lower trailing price-to-earnings (PE) ratio of 20.8 versus NMRK's 24.2.
- Analyst targets remain constructive for both, highlighting potential in capital markets and leasing recovery.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits Jones Lang LaSalle (JLL) against Newmark (NMRK), two prominent players in the commercial real estate services industry. Both firms provide essential advisory, leasing, and capital markets services amid a sector navigating interest rate shifts and office space demand fluctuations. Investors seeking exposure to CRE recovery or traders eyeing relative momentum in real estate operations will find value here. With recent market activity favoring leasing and investment management rebounds, understanding their business models, performance divergences, and risk profiles aids informed positioning in this cyclical space.
JLL Overview and Recent Performance
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated (JLL) is a global leader in commercial real estate and investment management, offering services like agency leasing, property management, advisory, and investment solutions across offices, industrial, retail, and data centers worldwide. In recent market activity, JLL shares have climbed notably, gaining over 12% in the past month to around $342. This momentum stems from analyst upgrades, including UBS raising its price target to $445 while maintaining a Buy rating, alongside optimism around Middle East expansion and logistics mandates. Trading near its 52-week high of $363 with a beta of 1.41, sentiment reflects stabilizing CRE leasing and capital markets, bolstered by a market cap of $15.86 billion and solid trailing EPS of $16.41.
NMRK Overview and Recent Performance
Newmark Group, Inc. (NMRK), a subsidiary of Cantor Fitzgerald, delivers commercial real estate advisory, capital markets, leasing, property management, and valuation services primarily in the U.S., U.K., and Asia. Recent weeks have seen NMRK shares rise to about $16.40, up over 2% in the latest session, building on YTD gains of 5.1%. Performance has been supported by steady sector tailwinds in occupier solutions and loan servicing, though with higher volatility (beta 1.83). Barclays' Overweight rating with a $19 target underscores potential, amid a $3.03 billion market cap and trailing EPS of $0.68. Shares remain within a 52-week range of $10.20 to $19.83, reflecting sensitivity to CRE cycles.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases the platform's top-performing AI-driven trading bots, curated from hundreds available—specifically 25 selected out of 351 total bots that trade thousands of tickers across various strategies. These bots employ diverse approaches, including swing trading, pattern recognition, and momentum plays, with performance metrics spanning win rates often above 60%, profit factors exceeding 1.5, and total returns ranging from 20-100% over different timeframes like daily to monthly holds. Suitable for current market conditions, they adapt to volatility in sectors like real estate. Traders can explore these bots for automated signals on stocks like JLL and NMRK, reviewing detailed stats to match their risk appetite and timeframe.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both JLL and NMRK operate in CRE services, focusing on leasing, tenant representation, and capital markets, but JLL's global footprint and investment management arm provide broader diversification versus NMRK's U.S.-centric emphasis. Growth drivers include rising leasing volumes and M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity, though JLL benefits from industrial and data center exposure. Recent momentum favors JLL with stronger gains, while NMRK leads YTD. Risk trade-offs highlight NMRK's higher beta and smaller scale amplifying downside in downturns. Market sentiment tilts positive for both on earnings anticipation, but JLL's lower PE suggests better relative valuation in the recovering sector.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models would currently lean toward JLL over NMRK, based on superior recent trend consistency, lower volatility, analyst catalyst momentum, and stronger positioning in global CRE recovery. While NMRK offers upside potential via higher YTD returns, JLL's scale and stability provide a probabilistic edge in prevailing conditions.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is JLL is a Hold and NMRK is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
JLL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNMRK’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- JLL’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- NMRK’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
JLL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NMRK’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- JLL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
- NMRK’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
JLL (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +1.43% price change this week, while NMRK (@Real Estate Development) price change was +3.90% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
JLL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
NMRK is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Development (-0.26% weekly)Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.
| JLL | NMRK | JLL / NMRK | |
| Capitalization | 13.9B | 2.7B | 516% |
| EBITDA | 1.48B | 460M | 322% |
| Gain YTD | -10.854 | -11.933 | 91% |
| P/E Ratio | 16.14 | 18.74 | 86% |
| Revenue | 26.8B | 3.48B | 771% |
| Total Cash | 436M | 212M | 206% |
| Total Debt | 3.98B | 2.46B | 161% |
JLL | NMRK | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 59 | 17 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 86 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 63 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 72 | 72 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 57 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 78 | 88 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
NMRK's Valuation (15) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for JLL (86). This means that NMRK’s stock grew significantly faster than JLL’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (63) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (85). This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's SMR Rating (72) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (72). This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
NMRK's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as JLL (57). This means that NMRK’s stock grew similarly to JLL’s over the last 12 months.
JLL's P/E Growth Rating (78) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as NMRK (88). This means that JLL’s stock grew similarly to NMRK’s over the last 12 months.
| JLL | NMRK | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 74% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 65% | 6 days ago 72% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 76% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 71% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| BSTZ | 30.74 | 0.44 | +1.45% |
| BlackRock Science and Technology Term Trust | |||
| OPTZ | 44.73 | N/A | N/A |
| Optimize Strategy Index ETF | |||
| AFB | 11.33 | -0.01 | -0.09% |
| Alliance National Municipal Income Fund | |||
| GNOM | 48.95 | -0.18 | -0.36% |
| Global X Genomics & Biotechnology ETF | |||
| OZEM | 30.56 | -0.29 | -0.95% |
| Roundhill GLP-1 & Weight Loss ETF | |||
JLL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, JLL has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if JLL jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To JLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JLL | 100% | +0.69% | ||
| CBRE - JLL | 89% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| CWK - JLL | 82% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| NMRK - JLL | 82% Closely correlated | +2.50% | ||
| CIGI - JLL | 69% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| MMI - JLL | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||
NMRK and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NMRK has been closely correlated with CBRE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NMRK jumps, then CBRE could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NMRK | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NMRK | 100% | +2.50% | ||
| CBRE - NMRK | 83% Closely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| CWK - NMRK | 83% Closely correlated | +2.20% | ||
| JLL - NMRK | 82% Closely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| CIGI - NMRK | 68% Closely correlated | +0.29% | ||
| MMI - NMRK | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.56% | ||
More | ||||