Frontline (FRO) and International Seaways (INSW) are leading tanker operators whose stocks attract attention from energy-sector investors and traders seeking exposure to maritime shipping cycles. Both companies benefit from dynamics in global oil transportation, including shifting trade routes and fleet utilization rates. This comparison examines their business models, recent financial results, price behavior, and positioning to help market participants evaluate relative strengths in the prevailing environment. Professional and individual investors focused on cyclical energy plays or dividend strategies may find the analysis relevant for portfolio construction and risk assessment.
Frontline plc owns and operates a large fleet of oil and product tankers, including very large crude carriers (VLCCs), Suezmax, and LR2/Aframax vessels, generating revenue primarily through spot and time charters. In recent market activity, the company delivered its strongest quarterly results on record for the second quarter of 2026, with net income reaching $659 million and earnings per share of $2.96. Management declared a regular quarterly dividend of $2.61 per share and announced plans for a special dividend from vessel sales. Average daily time charter equivalent earnings remained elevated across fleet segments, supported by favorable spot market conditions. The stock has traded near 52-week highs around $44–45 amid these developments and fleet optimization moves such as refinancing and securing multi-year charters on newbuilds.
International Seaways, Inc. owns and operates a diversified fleet focused on crude tankers and product carriers serving international flag markets. The company reported strong second-quarter 2026 results, including significantly higher time charter equivalent revenues and net income compared with the prior-year period. A quarterly dividend of $5.05 per share was declared, reflecting a high payout ratio. In recent weeks, the stock has traded in the $98–99 range near 52-week highs, with year-to-date gains exceeding 120%. Fleet renewal actions, including vessel sales that generated substantial proceeds, have supported liquidity and shareholder returns while the company maintains a relatively conservative debt position.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the platform’s most suitable AI trading bots for prevailing market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers across varied strategies, timeframes, and performance profiles. Only bots demonstrating consistent results and alignment with current market dynamics appear in the curated Trending section. Available bots span a wide range of win rates, average trade durations, and ticker coverage, allowing users to select approaches matching their risk tolerance and objectives. This resource provides data-driven options for automated trading strategies. Visit Trending AI Robots to explore the selection.
Frontline and International Seaways share exposure to the tanker sector but differ in scale and capital structure. FRO operates a larger fleet and reports higher overall revenue, providing greater earnings leverage to rate improvements, while INSW maintains lower debt levels relative to equity, offering more balance-sheet resilience. Recent momentum favors FRO following its record quarterly profit and dividend announcement, whereas INSW emphasizes consistent high payouts and fleet flexibility. Both face risks from rate volatility and geopolitical influences on trade flows, yet FRO’s larger capitalization may amplify short-term price swings compared with INSW’s more moderate profile. Market sentiment has remained constructive for both amid elevated vessel utilization.
Based on observable factors such as recent earnings consistency, dividend actions, and relative price stability in the prevailing tanker environment, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable positioning to FRO over INSW. Stronger quarterly outperformance and fleet optimization provide a visible catalyst edge, though both stocks remain subject to sector cyclicality and rate fluctuations that could alter relative assessments.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
| FRO | INSW | FRO / INSW | |
| Capitalization | 11B | 5.13B | 214% |
| EBITDA | 1.67B | 982M | 170% |
| Gain YTD | 142.817 | 144.758 | 99% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.38 | 6.63 | 111% |
| Revenue | 2.72B | 1.26B | 216% |
| Total Cash | 322M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 2.44B | 653M | 373% |
FRO | INSW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 42 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 8 Undervalued | 2 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 6 | 4 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 35 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 80 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
INSW's Valuation (2) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FRO (8). This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FRO (6). This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.
FRO's SMR Rating (20) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as INSW (27). This means that FRO’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.
FRO's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as INSW (35). This means that FRO’s stock grew similarly to INSW’s over the last 12 months.
INSW's P/E Growth Rating (80) in the Marine Shipping industry is in the same range as FRO (97). This means that INSW’s stock grew similarly to FRO’s over the last 12 months.
| FRO | INSW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 83% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 68% | 13 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 72% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRO’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while INSW’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INSW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
FRO (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) experienced а +6.70% price change this week, while INSW (@Oil & Gas Pipelines) price change was +4.22% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Pipelines industry was +1.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.44%.
FRO is expected to report earnings on Nov 30, 2026.
INSW is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.
Oil & Gas Pipelines industry includes companies that transport natural gas and crude oil through pipelines. These companies also collect and market the fuels. The pipeline segment could be considered as a midstream operation – functioning as a link between the upstream and downstream operations in the oil and gas industry. Some of the largest U.S. pipeline players include Enterprise Products Partners L.P, TC Energy Corporation and Energy Transfer, L.P.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRO has been closely correlated with DHT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRO jumps, then DHT could also see price increases.
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, INSW has been closely correlated with TNK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if INSW jumps, then TNK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To INSW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| INSW | 100% | +1.48% | ||
| TNK - INSW | 86% Closely correlated | +2.63% | ||
| TK - INSW | 82% Closely correlated | +1.99% | ||
| TEN - INSW | 82% Closely correlated | +7.13% | ||
| FRO - INSW | 81% Closely correlated | +1.67% | ||
| DHT - INSW | 81% Closely correlated | +2.66% | ||
More | ||||