FRSH
Price
$9.85
Change
+$0.68 (+7.42%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.72B
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FSLY
Price
$17.11
Change
+$0.89 (+5.49%)
Updated
Jun 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.68B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRSH vs FSLY

FRSH vs FSLY Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRSH vs. FSLY commentary
Jun 29, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Buy and FSLY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 29, 2026
Stock price -- (FRSH: $9.85 vs. FSLY: $17.11)
Brand notoriety: FRSH: Not notable vs. FSLY: Notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRSH: 300% vs. FSLY: 151%
Market capitalization -- FRSH: $2.72B vs. FSLY: $2.68B
FRSH [@Packaged Software] is valued at $2.72B. FSLY’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $2.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $195.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $8.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSLY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSLY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSLY is a better buy in the long-term than FRSH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSLY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSLY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRSH is a better buy in the short-term than FSLY.

Price Growth

FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а +11.17% price change this week, while FSLY (@Packaged Software) price change was -4.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.15%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

FSLY is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.01% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRSH($2.72B) and FSLY($2.68B) have the same market capitalization . FSLY YTD gains are higher at: 68.075 vs. FRSH (-19.592). FRSH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 42.9M vs. FSLY (-20.6M). FRSH has more cash in the bank: 779M vs. FSLY (330M). FRSH has less debt than FSLY: FRSH (38.8M) vs FSLY (398M). FRSH has higher revenues than FSLY: FRSH (871M) vs FSLY (653M).
FRSHFSLYFRSH / FSLY
Capitalization2.72B2.68B102%
EBITDA42.9M-20.6M-208%
Gain YTD-19.59268.075-29%
P/E Ratio14.54N/A-
Revenue871M653M133%
Total Cash779M330M236%
Total Debt38.8M398M10%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRSH vs FSLY: Fundamental Ratings
FRSH
FSLY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
56
Fair valued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
91100
SMR RATING
1..100
5195
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5241
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
30100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSLY's Valuation (34) in the null industry is in the same range as FRSH (56) in the Restaurants industry. This means that FSLY’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's Profit vs Risk Rating (91) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FSLY (100) in the null industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to FSLY’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's SMR Rating (51) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSLY (95) in the null industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSLY’s over the last 12 months.

FSLY's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as FRSH (52) in the Restaurants industry. This means that FSLY’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.

FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Restaurants industry is significantly better than the same rating for FSLY (100) in the null industry. This means that FRSH’s stock grew significantly faster than FSLY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRSHFSLY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
86%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRSH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FSLY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IBGL23.90N/A
N/A
iShares iBonds Dec 2055 Term Trsy ETF
CGIE36.37-0.22
-0.60%
Capital Group International Equity ETF
HAWX45.81-0.44
-0.95%
iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI ACWI exUS ETF
QVOY30.37-0.39
-1.26%
Q3 All-Season Active Rotation ETF
QQQP218.80-3.19
-1.44%
Tradr 2X Long Innovation100 QuarterlyETF

FRSH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been closely correlated with ASAN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then ASAN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRSH
1D Price
Change %
FRSH100%
+7.42%
ASAN - FRSH
73%
Closely correlated
+9.08%
HUBS - FRSH
72%
Closely correlated
+8.92%
CRM - FRSH
71%
Closely correlated
+5.45%
TEAM - FRSH
70%
Closely correlated
+5.44%
DOCU - FRSH
69%
Closely correlated
+6.48%
More

FSLY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSLY has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSLY jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSLY
1D Price
Change %
FSLY100%
+5.52%
COIN - FSLY
60%
Loosely correlated
+4.59%
CLSK - FSLY
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.90%
RIOT - FSLY
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.92%
RAMP - FSLY
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.72%
COMP - FSLY
49%
Loosely correlated
+3.17%
More