Advertisement
FRSH vs QSR
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) vs. Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Freshworks Inc. (FRSH), a SaaS provider in customer engagement software, has shown strong year-to-date (YTD) gains of about 29%, but remains volatile near the lower end of its 52-week range.
- Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR), operator of global quick-service brands, trades near its 52-week high with YTD returns around 17% and a stable dividend yield of 3.25%.
- FRSH boasts a lower price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 13.9 versus QSR's 30.4, suggesting relative value in tech amid recent revenue beats.
- QSR exhibits lower volatility with a beta of 0.53 and positive analyst price target upgrades in recent weeks.
- Technology sector exposure gives FRSH higher growth potential but increased market sensitivity, while QSR benefits from defensive consumer cyclical traits.
- Recent momentum favors FRSH short-term, but QSR's scale and cash flow provide a stability edge.
Introduction
This stock comparison pits Freshworks Inc. (FRSH), a technology firm specializing in AI-driven customer relationship management (CRM) software, against Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR), a global leader in quick-service restaurants. Traders seeking growth in SaaS versus stability in franchised food chains, or investors balancing tech volatility with consumer staples resilience, will find value here. Amid recent market rotations, FRSH highlights software innovation potential, while QSR underscores dividend reliability and brand expansion. This analysis draws on relative performance, sentiment, and positioning for informed relative evaluation.
FRSH Overview and Recent Performance
Freshworks Inc. (FRSH) develops cloud-based customer engagement platforms, including CRM, helpdesk, and AI tools like Freddy AI, targeting small to mid-sized businesses. Trading around $8.75 with a market capitalization of $2.44 billion, the stock sits in the lower half of its 52-week range ($6.79–$16.14). Recent market activity has driven YTD gains of approximately 29%, fueled by Q4 2025 revenue of $223 million beating estimates and profitability improvements. Sentiment has shifted positively on short-term momentum, with shares up over 7% in a recent session amid analyst buy reiterations, though volatility persists from broader tech sector pressures and a recent Jefferies downgrade. High trading volume signals interest, but earnings per share (EPS) of $0.63 (TTM) and a P/E of 13.9 reflect valuation debates.
QSR Overview and Recent Performance
Restaurant Brands International Inc. (QSR) owns iconic brands like Burger King, Tim Hortons, Popeyes, and Firehouse Subs, operating primarily through franchising with over 30,000 locations worldwide. At about $80 per share and a $36.5 billion market cap, it hovers near its 52-week high ($61–$82). YTD performance stands at roughly 17%, supported by steady system-wide sales growth and a 3.25% dividend yield. Recent weeks feature analyst upgrades, including Scotiabank raising its price target, ahead of Q1 earnings on May 6. EPS of $2.63 (TTM) and P/E of 30.4 indicate premium pricing for its 8% profit margins and $1.4 billion levered free cash flow, with sentiment bolstered by resilient consumer demand despite industry headwinds.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top performers from its library of 351 AI trading bots, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto using machine learning strategies. Only the most suitable for current conditions—boasting win rates from 51% to 88%, annualized returns up to 163%, profit factors to 11.7, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 17—earn a spot among the 25+ featured bots. These vary by style (e.g., short-term scalping on 5-minute charts or swing trades up to 49 days), focusing on hot sectors like semiconductors, data centers, and gold miners with 3–18 tickers each. Virtual agents incorporate risk controls like stop-losses. Traders can explore these high-conviction signals to align with market trends.
Head-to-Head Comparison
FRSH’s SaaS model drives subscription revenue growth (18% annualized recently) via AI enhancements, contrasting QSR’s franchise royalties and fees from global expansion. Momentum tilts to FRSH with recent surges, but QSR offers lower risk via its 0.53 beta (five-year monthly) and high debt-to-equity offset by cash flows. Tech exposure amplifies FRSH’s sensitivity to rates and AI hype, while QSR’s consumer cyclical stance weathers demand softness better. Market sentiment favors QSR’s upgrades versus FRSH’s mixed calls, trading off growth for stability.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI models currently lean toward QSR over FRSH, citing superior trend consistency near 52-week highs, lower volatility, upcoming catalysts like earnings, and robust free cash flow relative positioning. While FRSH shows short-term upside potential, QSR’s stability edges it in probabilistic outperformance amid uncertain markets.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRSH is a Hold and QSR is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FRSH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQSR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FRSH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- QSR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FRSH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while QSR’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FRSH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- QSR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FRSH (@Packaged Software) experienced а -0.05% price change this week, while QSR (@Restaurants) price change was +3.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.09%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was +9.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.02%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.24%.
Reported Earning Dates
FRSH is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.
QSR is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (-2.27% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
@Restaurants (+9.39% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
| FRSH | QSR | FRSH / QSR | |
| Capitalization | 2.61B | 26B | 10% |
| EBITDA | 42.9M | 2.68B | 2% |
| Gain YTD | -22.898 | 10.671 | -215% |
| P/E Ratio | 15.37 | 24.07 | 64% |
| Revenue | 871M | 9.59B | 9% |
| Total Cash | 779M | 1.01B | 77% |
| Total Debt | 38.8M | 15.7B | 0% |
FRSH | QSR | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 24 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 91 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 51 | 35 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 55 | 52 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 27 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 15 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
QSR's Valuation (24) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSH (57). This means that QSR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
QSR's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Restaurants industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRSH (91). This means that QSR’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
QSR's SMR Rating (35) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FRSH (51). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
QSR's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as FRSH (55). This means that QSR’s stock grew similarly to FRSH’s over the last 12 months.
FRSH's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the Restaurants industry is in the same range as QSR (49). This means that FRSH’s stock grew similarly to QSR’s over the last 12 months.
| FRSH | QSR | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 72% | 3 days ago 62% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 3 days ago 52% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 57% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 49% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 80% | 13 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 84% | 3 days ago 60% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 42% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| TILT | 273.56 | 1.55 | +0.57% |
| FlexShares Mstar US Mkt Factors Tilt ETF | |||
| PBOC | 30.45 | 0.05 | +0.17% |
| PGIM S&P 500 Buffer 20 ETF - Oct | |||
| HFMF | 21.98 | N/A | +0.02% |
| Unlimited HFMF Managed Futures ETF | |||
| DYFI | 22.79 | N/A | -0.02% |
| IDX Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | |||
| NBH | 10.39 | -0.06 | -0.57% |
| Neuberger Municipal Fund Inc. | |||
FRSH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRSH has been closely correlated with HUBS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRSH jumps, then HUBS could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FRSH | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRSH | 100% | +2.44% | ||
| HUBS - FRSH | 71% Closely correlated | +0.83% | ||
| CRM - FRSH | 71% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| TEAM - FRSH | 69% Closely correlated | -0.76% | ||
| ASAN - FRSH | 68% Closely correlated | -0.94% | ||
| SPT - FRSH | 68% Closely correlated | +2.39% | ||
More | ||||